Predicting the Chicago Gun Case
Legal blogger and FantasySCOTUS proprietor Josh Blackman does the math and creates a nice post explaining which Supreme Court justice is most likely to author the majority opinion this month in the eagerly anticipated gun rights case McDonald v. Chicago. Spoiler alert: It's not John Paul Stevens.
For more on the Chicago gun case, see here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fantasy Scotus. What an Idea.
Can I pack the bench with cartoon characters? Daffy and Bugs, Jerry (but not Tom), Quick Draw McGraw, The Pink Panther, Frylock, Big Gay Al, Huey Freeman, and Mentok The Mindtaker.
That's too depressing a game to play, I'm afraid.
I'd like to pick a fantasy SCOTUS, populated by my idea of good jurists.
Spoiler alert:
Ginsburg.
In my fantasy SCOTUS, they would all be doing something else.
Court-related metal
Cool! I'm so gonna listen to that and get pumped up for the next case.