Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Congressman Smacks Around College Kid

Radley Balko | 6.14.2010 9:14 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Another public official not fond of being recorded in a pubilc space.

(Via Mike Flynn)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Molly Bloom Might Have Said Yes I Said Yes I Will Yes, But Steve Jobs & The NY Times Said No

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

PoliticsDemocratic Party
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (192)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Fucking little people...

  2. John   15 years ago

    Like celebrities, feral legislators are extremely unpredictable and dangerous. If you see one roaming the streets, do not approach it. Call animal control and let the professionals handle it.

    1. John C. Randolph   15 years ago

      Looks to me like Etheridge is a belligerent drunk.

      -jcr

  3. JW   15 years ago

    Shit. Gary Busey has really let himself go.

  4. TXLimey   15 years ago

    Obama was right - questioning the government does lead to violence!

    1. PIRS   15 years ago

      +99

  5. Bob Etheridge   15 years ago

    This is gonna be a critical year ... for things we do in Washington.

    1. CoyoteBlue   15 years ago

      His opponent in the other oligarchic party isn't hard on the eyes.

      And she hasn't assualted anyone in weeks!

      1. James Anderson Merritt   15 years ago

        As a member of the mainstream medical community, she's also a credible, vocal opponent of government-provided health care, more likely to bandage you up after an assault than to commit one.

  6. Steve Nash Equilibrium   15 years ago

    At what point are you legally allowed to punch someone in the face if they refuse to let go of you?

    1. Suki   15 years ago

      In Florida you can shoot them before they grab you.

    2. Adam   15 years ago

      In this case, I'd guess around the 0:25 mark. By the 0:51 mark, that kid was entitled to knee that little shitdick congressman in the balls.

      1. SIV   15 years ago

        I'm not sure about DC but in GA the kid could have defended himself to the point of lethal force.Stand your ground is the law here.

  7. Dazed   15 years ago

    Freedom of speech aside, this trend of anyone with a flip cam waiting to jump anyone on the street to get a reaction is becoming disturbingly out of hand. The kid with the camera could have identified himself to the Congressman before sticking a camera in his face for his "gotcha" moment. An argument can be made that it comes with the territory, but come on..... a little decorum and courtesy wouldn't hurt anyone. I'm just a nobody, but I would consider it a form of assault for someone I don't know or who has not at the least identified themselves to walk up to me unbidden and stick a camera in my face.

    1. Steve Nash Equilibrium   15 years ago

      So you consider someone filming you in a public space assault? Do you work in law enforcement by chance?

      1. Dan T.   15 years ago

        What the "student" did was not assault but it could be considered harassment.

        1. Aresen   15 years ago

          Nope. Not even close.

          Ambush journalism goes way back. 60 Minutes made a specialty of it.

          The left was perfectly OK with Michael Moore doing it.

          1. kinnath   15 years ago

            I have always hated ambush journalism. I didn't like it when 60 minutes did it, nor Jerry Rivers, not Michael Moore.

            That being said, the Congressman was way, way over the line and into the relm of criminal assault. Everyone in the public sphere knows you can't touch the paparazzi.

            1. Kiwi Dave   15 years ago

              Right. Ambush journliasm is nasty, but it comes with the territory of being a public figure, especially an elected official who is a servant of the people. In fact, people have a right to ask questions of their delegated legislators -- ideally always in a mild and civil way, but being a bit rude doesn't change anything.

              I would have been ok with the Hon. Gentleman ignoring the kid, and maybe pushing him aside if he was in the way. But grabbing him like that is ridiculously way over the line. I cannot believe that anyone would try to defend Etheridge over this.

              I have to say, even though I am not on Team Red, the double standard kills me. If that was a Repub congressman, it would be a gigantic cause celebre, but as it is I think the story will be forgotten in a day or two.

              1. kinnath   15 years ago

                Private figures aren't protected either. Lots of news agencies have ambushed mid-level employees of private companies to chase a story. These people were not public figures by any conventional definition prior to being ambushed.

                1. Kiwi Dave   15 years ago

                  I know -- this is also where the political bias comes in. Michael Moore basically makes a career out of ambushing low- and mid- level employees of private companies -- if anyone ever kicked that ample ass of his...

          2. joshua corning   15 years ago

            How is this an ambush? He is a congressman and was asked a simple soft ball question.

            Dan T calling it Harassment is rich. Asking a congressmen in public if he supports the president, in his lefty mind, is now considered a crime.

    2. Nick   15 years ago

      And you would be wrong, you dumb dildo. The only assault in this video was from the Congressman.

      1. Dazed   15 years ago

        Well, gee thanks for the nice ad hominem.... pardon me for having an opinion that differs from yours. Should have known that would bring out your inner child

        1. Dan T.   15 years ago

          You must be new to H&R, Dazed...

        2. Nick   15 years ago

          You passed off freedom of speech and made an idiotic comment equating video taping and asking questions as assault. You earned the ad hom.

          1. hmm   15 years ago

            And what a nice ad hom it was.

            I give it a B+

            There could have been a little more creativity.

            1. Kiwi Dave   15 years ago

              "dumb dildo" has a deliciously fifth-grade playground insult sound to it.

              1. Smart Dildo   15 years ago

                I find it irksome.

        3. Warty   15 years ago

          And here we have another stupid shithead who doesn't know the difference between an insult and an ad hominem. Here's a tip, new dumbass: if Dan T. takes your side, you done went and fucked up.

          1. Dan T.   15 years ago

            I agree with you, Warty.

    3. PR   15 years ago

      unbidden

      Bob Etheridge awoke that morning in a fog, soaked in his his own urine, feces, and blood, only to discover that Harry Potter had turned him into a Congressturd against his will.

      1. Attorney   15 years ago

        Muy LULZ

    4. Orlando M   15 years ago

      You'd be wrong, then. Doubly so if you were a public figure like, say, a Congressman.

    5. Seward   15 years ago

      There is no "Freedom of speech aside..."

    6. KD   15 years ago

      Dazed, your screen name says it all. Have you ever heard of "turning the other cheek" or "taking the high road". Can you imagine if Dr. King had been unable to control his temper?

      If the congressman has any integrity, he will resign immediately, then apologize.

      1. Dr. King   15 years ago

        Well, I don't know what will happen now. We've got some difficult days ahead. But it doesn't matter with me now. Because I've been to the mountaintop. And I don't mind. Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place. But I'm not concerned about that now. I just want to do God's will. And He's allowed me to go up to the mountain. And I've looked over. And I've seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight, that we, as a people, will get to the promised land. And I'm happy, tonight. I'm not worried about anything. I'm not fearing any man, because there is a well-fortified trench up there with two 50-caliber machine guns and tens of thousands of rounds of ammo. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord!

    7. JW   15 years ago

      Freedom of speech aside

      Wrong. Try again.

    8. JohnD   15 years ago

      At least you got your on line name right.... Dazed pretty much describes you.

      1. J sub D   15 years ago

        Dazed is just his first name. His whole name is Dazed And Confused.

        1. David Wooderson   15 years ago

          That's what I like about them High School girls man, I get older.... They stay the same age.... yes, they do.

    9. hmm   15 years ago

      I'd call this a troll, but the email links back to an insurance company. That appears to be run by a troll in Oregon.

      Oregon, go figure. A resident of a state that has taken the broken window fallacy to new and exiting policy heights.

      1. hmm   15 years ago

        Oops Michigan.

    10. Gary Packwood   15 years ago

      Absolutely. Good reply and correct.

      People must obviously identify themselves or suffer the consequences.
      ::
      GP

      1. hmm   15 years ago

        I wouldn't identify myself. And while my wallet doesn't say "Bad Motherfucker" I could wipe that sidewalk with Bob.

        Would that be okay with you?

    11. Tim   15 years ago

      You can film congressmen on a public sidewalk.

      1. Liberty Gal   15 years ago

        Can you film a drunk Congressman on a public sidewalk?

    12. Fluffy   15 years ago

      WTF does identifying himself have to do with anything?

      Seriously?

      So if the kid had said, "I'm Joe Blow" is the Congressman all of a sudden going to know who he is?

      That information adds absolutely nothing to the exchange unless they've met before and know each other by name.

      The only way it can make any difference at all is if the Congressman would have behaved respectfully if the kid had answered, "I'm Ezra Klein." The question only makes sense if the Congressman was preparing to be nice if the kid was "important" and a dick if he wasn't.

    13. Yonemoto   15 years ago

      http://www.cracked.com/article.....rable.html

      1. Fluffy   15 years ago

        That article is moronic. If it wasn't 2 years old I'd register over there to tell them so.

    14. 995   15 years ago

      keep supporting drunk law makers then!. Who cares if the guy had a camera, the people elected him. If that was a solider on the streets and did that he'd be dishonorably discharged. We should get no less from a law maker that we pay to live in a million dollar office all day and do nothing but drink.

  8. PR   15 years ago

    so if he's not charged with anything, can we assume it's legal to manhandle the congressman in the same way? Oh yeah, I forgot, 2 Americas.

    1. Nick   15 years ago

      I would have kicked him in the nuts. I think kicking people in the nuts is wrong. Fortunately, he's a politician and not really human. Principles intact!

      1. Jordan Elliot   15 years ago

        Indeed.

  9. Virginia   15 years ago

    heat/kitchen, Etheridge.

  10. Marc   15 years ago

    Take the video to the cops and sign a complaint. Nothing would come of it but it might ruffle some feathers at least.

    The congressman, obviously, is a pig... but I repeat myself.

  11. Warty   15 years ago

    Too bad the kid didn't know any grappling. "Congressman Assaults Student, Has Arm Broken" would be a nice headline to read.

    1. sage   15 years ago

      I was thinking the same thing, Warty. If he grabbed me like that he'd get bounced off the pavement.

      1. Nick   15 years ago

        Sweep the leg.

    2. Pablo   15 years ago

      Yeah the kid handled himself well. But it would be tempting to put that fuck in an arm bar and see if he knew to tap out before his elbow snapped.

    3. MCab   15 years ago

      "Who am I? A Gracie!" *SNAP*

    4. Aresen   15 years ago

      The student did exactly the right thing by not striking back.

      Because the student did not strike back, Etheridge kept digging himself deeper and deeper into a hole. Note that the student repeatedly asked the Congressman to let go of his arm. By failing to do so, the Congressman went well beyond any reasonable standard of self-protection.

      Also, if the student had done anything (even a simple breakhold maneuver, which is ridiculously easy against a one-hand grip), there is a good chance that Etheridge would have been able to play it up as if he were somehow wronged.

      1. Kiwi Dave   15 years ago

        Lucky the camera stayed on. How much would you be willing to bet that if this incident wasn't filmed, the kid would be charged with assault?

        1. Aresen   15 years ago

          Not a penny against a five spot.

          1. Kiwi Dave   15 years ago

            One interesting thing is that the surveillance society may end up, paradoxically, reducing the abusive of state power.

            1. kinnath   15 years ago

              Once the genie is out of the bottle . . . . .

            2. Tulpa   15 years ago

              The fact that libertarians consider that a paradox speaks volumes about warped libertarian attitudes toward surveillance.

              There is going to be surveillance. That is not evitable. Only question is, who is surveilling who? If everybody's surveilling, everyone will be surveilled.

  12. hmm   15 years ago

    I think someone's reelection campaign just took an interesting turn.

  13. kc   15 years ago

    the "opposition" must be doing something right if congresspeople are so defensive that they go on the offensive.....

  14. CoyoteBlue   15 years ago

    I looked at these mini camcorders, and though cool and dirt cheap, I didn't think that I'd use it enough to justify the marginal cost. But with them freaking out cops and congressmen and various other official thugs, I might get one and hang it around my neck. It appears that the gov-thugs fear the little cameras and like a talisman this will keep them away from me.

    1. JohnD   15 years ago

      LOL. Great idea.

    2. hmm   15 years ago

      So you're going to be what Flavor Flav is to clocks to camcorders?

      Ya BOOOOOOYYYYYY.

    3. JEP   15 years ago

      I employ a Japanese tourist group to follow me around...

      1. hmm   15 years ago

        I find myself desperately in need of a "That's Racist" .jif of a Japanese kid.

  15. ?   15 years ago

    This video could use some theme music.
    I dunno, maybe the Who's Who Are you ?

  16. Hale   15 years ago

    If you libertarians had your way that kid wouldn't even have a sidewalk to walk on to ask the Congressman a question cause you hate government provided sidewalks. So at least have some sympathy for the Congressman who provided us all with sidewalks to walk on. Oh, and the Congressman also thinks murder should be illegal, unlike all you libertarians. If you had your way he could have just killed the kid and walked on.

    1. JohnD   15 years ago

      ?? Is this supposed to be sarcastic commentary or are you just stupid?

      1. Colin   15 years ago

        I'm betting on the latter.

        1. West Texas Boy   15 years ago

          Sarcasm borne of stupidity!

          1. The Gobbler   15 years ago

            Sarpidity.

            1. Ben   15 years ago

              Bravo.

              1. The Libertarian Guy   15 years ago

                Pathetic troll attempt. Fail +1.

    2. Aresen   15 years ago

      Drink?

      1. J sub D   15 years ago

        Close enough.

      2. GILMORE   15 years ago

        x3 i think

    3. Ska   15 years ago

      *yawn*

    4. MCab   15 years ago

      Behold! THE STRAWMAN!

    5. Joe M   15 years ago

      Pretty decent troll. I give B-.

  17. sage   15 years ago

    I was about to say something, but I see you did that on purpose.

    1. sage   15 years ago

      Arg. This was supposed to be a reply to John @ 9:23.

      1. John @ 9:23   15 years ago

        Yes?

  18. Dan T.   15 years ago

    While the Congressman here was out of line somewhat, it's not hard to understand how having some punk harass you on the sidewalk might cause you to overreact a little.

    And it was funny to see the kid whimper once he realize he had gotten more than he bargained for.

    1. hmm   15 years ago

      What do you want to bet this happened because it was a kid. I don't think Bob would have quite the same bravado if he were facing me or a similar sized man.

      1. sailshonan   15 years ago

        ...or someone who looked like he represented an established media source. The Fourth Estate, after all, are not the serfs. Can't let the serfs get uppity.

    2. Warty   15 years ago

      You're still here, moron?

      I realized he was right and headed for the bathroom. I noticed there was only one other customer in the store, a very tall man who looked like he was about to pour a half-gallon of milk over his head but had stopped, his body frozen except for his eyes.

      "Milk will stop the transmissions, but it will kill me," he said in a muffled tone of voice.

    3. Seward   15 years ago

      Glenn Greenwald has a different position: http://twitter.com/ggreenwald

      1. hmm   15 years ago

        I wouldn't want him arrested. He'd just get out of it. A swift and proper beat down resulting in missing teeth and at least a weeks recover, however, would leave a lasting impact.

        1. Dan T.   15 years ago

          I don't think the kid deserves that...Etheridge made him shit his pants, that probably is punishment enough.

          1. hmm   15 years ago

            You are either a clever troll or a flaming retard.

          2. Colin   15 years ago

            Bet if it were a Republican congressman your view would be 180 degrees opposite.

            Make like the wind, babe.

            1. grylliade   15 years ago

              Oh, Dan T. already blows. It's pretty much his MO.

    4. Nick   15 years ago

      SF was right. Not a real person.

    5. Mike M.   15 years ago

      You're the biggest douchebag here in the entire place, you Shit Facktory.

      1. The Gobbler   15 years ago

        You owe me a quarter.

    6. MWG   15 years ago

      "...it's not hard to understand how having some punk harass you on the sidewalk might cause you to overreact a little.

      I think this proves, once and for all, that Dan T. is as much a douche bag in person as he is on H&R.

      1. joshua corning   15 years ago

        What is weird is how much a soft ball question the kid gave. How could that question provoke such a reaction?

        I mean all he had to say was. "I support the agenda of my constituents of district 2 South Carolina." and then walked away.

        My guess is either he simply hates youth or some Democrats really hate being questioned.

    7. The Libertarian Guy   15 years ago

      "somewhat"

      My God, Dan, you're pathetic today.

      1. Mr. FIFY   15 years ago

        Just today?

  19. Aresen   15 years ago

    Well, if a peasant doesn't properly bow and pull his forelock when in the presence of nobility, he deserves to be smacked down.

    I'm only surprised that Baron Congressman Etheridge didn't have the student charged with lese majeste.

    1. Tim   15 years ago

      Correct me if I'm wrong but in feudal Japan the peasant would have been beheaded for making eye contact.

      1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

        Beheading with a warning not to do it again.

        1. Aresen   15 years ago

          Thanks for the morning laugh, Pro Lib.

          1. Pro Libertate   15 years ago

            Hey, I watched Shogun!

  20. P Brooks   15 years ago

    If the congressman has any integrity, he will resign immediately, then apologize.

    Snap out of it!

    1. Aresen   15 years ago

      Politically, there are two ways Etheridge can handle this:

      The first way is to make some derogatory comments about "smart-ass college kids trying to play ambush journalists." This is the dumb way, but it will play with the Congressman's partisans, who will ignore the fact that he grossly over-reacted.

      The second way is to make a flat out apology with some comment about being startled and not thinking straight at the time. That would be the smart way as it would sit easier with his softer supporters.

      1. CoyoteBlue   15 years ago

        Or some variation of the 'Kennedy Excuse', "I was drunk/on legally-prescribed drugs at the time."

  21. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Get your head out of your ass, Dan.

    1. Dan T.   15 years ago

      Hey, I said the guy was out of line. He should have just kept walking.

      But at the same time I'm not going to blame him too much for getting pissed off when somebody harasses him on the sidewalk...the kid provoked him to try to get a reaction and he got one.

      1. Seward   15 years ago

        A single question does not constitute "harassment." Now, if the guy had said "no comment" and they had hectored him down the street for fifty or a hundred yards, that would be another matter entirely. But the video doesn't show them doing that, does it?

        And no, you said he was "somewhat" out of line.

        1. Dan T.   15 years ago

          I think it's pretty clear the student's intent was to harass Etheridge.

          And yeah, Etheridge was "somewhat" out of line, meaning that ideally he would have handled the situation better but it wasn't him who initiated the confrontation.

          1. Seward   15 years ago

            Based on what one can see in the video, the intent of the student was to get Etheridge to answer a perfectly legitimate query about his support regarding the agenda of the Obama administration. It isn't as if the student asked him "Do you still beat your wife?" Congressmen (or anyone else for that matter) don't get to manhandle you just because you ask them a query about their political positions on a public street. Furthermore, it isn't as if they simply asked him the query; they told him good morning and greeted him.

            1. PR   15 years ago

              actually Seward, he asked if he fully supported the Obama agenda, which out here in the real U.S., is exactly like asking if you still beat your wife.

              1. The Libertarian Guy   15 years ago

                Again with the "somewhat out of line" shit, Dan?

                You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

      2. Gretchen   15 years ago

        Harasses him? The kid asked him a question. If he didn't want to answer it, he should've said "No comment" and walked on. He's a politician; it's not like that should be anything new. Talk about blaming the victim...

        1. Dan T.   15 years ago

          Look at it this way - the kid's intent was to ambush Etheridge and get him to do/say something embarassing on camera.

          He suceeded, probably beyond his wildest dreams. So be happy for him.

          1. Gretchen   15 years ago

            I don't care what the kid's intent was, honestly, but I am happy that they had a video camera on hand so that this douchebag's behavior is immortalized.

            1. Dan T.   15 years ago

              Exactly...you guys are happy that this event happened so stop trying to act so horrified.

              1. Gretchen   15 years ago

                Yeah, being happy that horrific events are recorded is exactly the same as being happy that they happened. I think the guy above was right-- clever troll or a flaming retard.

          2. Head Asplode   15 years ago

            Supporting the Obama agenda is embarrassing?

      3. Fist of Etiquette   15 years ago

        He's a public servant, not some random private individual out for a morning stroll.

        And btw, a politician who doesn't see himself as above the constituency would have had the presence of mind to say, "Call my office to set up an interview." An entitled moron, on the other hand, mugs a citizen on camera with what he probably expects will be impunity.

  22. Old Man with Candy   15 years ago

    Some kids just need slapping.

    1. Old man with Van   15 years ago

      Or spanked.

  23. CONGRESSMAN   15 years ago

    HOW DARE YOU SPEAK TO ME!

    1. Tim   15 years ago

      Heh.

  24. dennis   15 years ago

    Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.
    Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    HELP! HELP! I'm being repressed!
    Did you see him repressing me, you saw it didn't you?

    1. Sean W. Malone   15 years ago

      Oh poor dennis, violence *is* the system... "Democracy" and syndicalist communes where everyone takes turns managing the collective for a week just don't change that.

      1. dennis   15 years ago

        Maybe so, but if I went around sayin' I was an empereror just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd put me away!

        1. Sean W. Malone   15 years ago

          They sure would... That is, of course, unless you had a large army filled with people who were ready to murder others who disagreed with you. Then you'd probably be able to be that emperor you'd always wanted to be.

          (ps. sorry for making Python less funny this morning, everybody)

          1. dennis   15 years ago

            The syndicate voted and by a stunning super-majority we decided that those responsible for making Python less funny should be sacked. To the gallows with you!!!

  25. nathan   15 years ago

    This is a personal demonstration of governmental assault on the individual. Well done sir! I wish I had been there; I'd have given him a Scottish hullo, a head butt. Which is more than he deserves.

  26. Tim   15 years ago

    What kind of a country is this there where a humble public servant can't walk down the street without a fooking plebe asking him for an opinion?

  27. Stretchy   15 years ago

    I love how you guys are calling this "assault" and, "violence" and blathering on about how he should call the cops. Really? The kid clearly wanted a confrontation and the worst that happened to him was he got an old man grab but, you're right, he should definitely press charges.

    1. hmm   15 years ago

      If the kid had done it to the congressman would it be assault?

      1. sailshonan   15 years ago

        Or if the kid had been a cop...after all, cops can come up to citizens and ask all kinds of intrusive questions, and that's Constitutionally considered to be like any ordinary citizen asking another citizen questions. Does this mean if a cop engages me in intrusive conversation and does not intend to detain me, I can grab his arm and demand to know his name?

    2. Dan T.   15 years ago

      And we still don't know if Etheridge supports the Obama "agenda"!

      1. Susan Hogarth   15 years ago

        Best. Comment. Here.

      2. res ipsa loquitur   15 years ago

        Didn't he demonstrate it?

    3. Fist of Etiquette   15 years ago

      Yeah, the menacing gang surrounded an feeble old timer as he's probably on his way to pick up his pills from the Rite Aid or hurrying to make the early bird special. No doubt these are the same kinds of punks that used to film bum fights.

      1. Pablo   15 years ago

        From the video it looked like he was on his way to happy hour, and got a head start before he left for his stroll.

    4. Fluffy   15 years ago

      If I did that to Obama, what would happen?

      1. Barry O   15 years ago

        I would kick your ass, that's what.

      2. Hugh Akston   15 years ago

        A few weeks from now someone on this board would say"I wonder what ever happened to Fluffy?"

    5. R C Dean   15 years ago

      I love how you guys are calling this "assault"

      Only because it is. Texas (which is where I practice) has a pretty typical definition, which includes:

      intentionally or knowingly caus[ing] physical contact with another when the person knows or should reasonably believe that the other will regard the contact as offensive or provocative.

      1. robc   15 years ago

        Im guessing his assault doesnt reach felony levels though, does it? Too bad.

        1. Coeus   15 years ago

          By continuing to hold onto him, would he be liable for a kidnapping charge or it's equivalent?

  28. BuelahMan   15 years ago

    That was an "accidental" head butt waiting to happen.

    1. robc   15 years ago

      That was an intentional left to the jaw waiting to happen. And a couple more punches after the congressman was on the ground. All in self defense, of course.

  29. J sub D   15 years ago

    I live in a big city and previously spent 20 years as a sailor prowling waterfront bars, red-light districts, nunneries, botanical gardens and art museums all over the world. I can attest that someone bothering you as you walk down the street is completely fucking normal!

    1. Aresen   15 years ago

      "...sailor prowling waterfront bars, red-light districts, nunneries..."

      I guess that, since nobody gives land grants to nunneries any more, the nuns have to earn a living somehow.

    2. grylliade   15 years ago

      Yeah, just the other day a bum asked me for some change. Little did I know I should've grabbed his arm and demanded to know who he was. After all, his intent was to "harass" me into giving him money! That means it's completely justified!

      1. T   15 years ago

        Well, money changes everything. That makes into filthy commerce, which you have no right to engage in with other consenting adults. So if the bum was trying to coerce you into commerce against your will, you should have curb-stomped him right there to show him commerce is a privilege, not a right.

        Or something like that. The logic baffles me, but I'm sure the choad who thinks that will be along today with variations of the theme.

  30. Tonio   15 years ago

    I think Congressman Etheridge just provided his opponent in the next election some powerful ammo.

    I don't expect he'll resign over this, but will be interesting to see if he tries to get re-elected.

    1. robc   15 years ago

      Resign? He better be in fucking prison.

  31. Attorney   15 years ago

    Fuck Friday Funnies. This thread is gold!

  32. P Brooks   15 years ago

    Maybe Etheridge thought that camera was stealing his soul.

  33. kinnath   15 years ago

    As noted far upstream, ambush journalism has been in practice for 30 going on 40 years.

    Anyone on a public street (public or private person)is fair game to be asked (shouted at) questions of almost any nature with the cameras rolling. The paparazzi have won numerous lawsuits when their victims have assaulted them.

    The congressman is in deep shit.

  34. P Brooks   15 years ago

    If I did that to Obama, what would happen?

    Arugula, Baby!

  35. PR   15 years ago

    When asked if the Congressman has resigned, his office replied "no comment" without demanding to know who I was.

    1. Fluffy   15 years ago

      "Yet".

      They may visit you later and do the "old man grab".

  36. The Gobbler   15 years ago

    Off Topic, but I saw a re-airing of the Glen Beck show where he introduces his audience to Hayek. It was really quite good.

  37. PR   15 years ago

    When the Congressman grabbed the kid's neck, I thought he was about go all STEVE SMITH on the poor kid.

    1. Attorney   15 years ago

      He just wanted to give him some noogies.

      1. Typical Jock   15 years ago

        NEEERRRRDDSSSSS!!!

  38. John C. Randolph   15 years ago

    Did that kid file charges?

    -jcr

  39. I hate Mondays   15 years ago

    Did he snatch the camera out of the guy's hand? Thief!

  40. Rep. Kerafyrm   15 years ago

    BEGONE, INSECT! I HAVE MUCH SLAUGHTERING TO DO.

  41. Spoonman.   15 years ago

    The Fark thread on this is astounding. People are really defending the congressman just because he's a Democrat.

    1. Mike M.   15 years ago

      What's astounding? Leftist douchenozzles have no genuine principles to speak of other than their insane lust for absolute power.

    2. Kool   15 years ago

      No doubt. I can't bring myself to even read the comments section over there as the TEAM RED/TEAM BLUE crap is descpicable. Not to mention the variations of "I'm not giving Reason a click..." idiocy.

    3. Tonio   15 years ago

      Wondering if this is blowback from the Breitbart/ACORN kerfuffle. So much for objective truth, it's The Narrative(tm) that matters...

    4. Tulpa   15 years ago

      You have to crack a few wrists to make an Obamlette.

  42. Fact:   15 years ago

    Bob Etheridge is a mammal.

    1. T   15 years ago

      You have no evidence of that. He could be a cleverly disguised reptile, or a robot.

  43. MCab   15 years ago

    *bad overdub* Hahaha, for someone who's a Shaolin democrat, your kung-fu's really lousy!

  44. James Anderson Merritt   15 years ago

    See THIS vintage clip, starring the legendary Richard Belzer, to understand the DC mindset in its entirety:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgTzlXdviWk

    Since at least the time I was in high school, and this clip was released as part of a theatrical motion picture, ours has been a Thugocracy. Back then, people laughed at what they took to be over-the-top humor. They aren't laughing anymore.

  45. joshua corning   15 years ago

    David Weigel called it a hug.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.c.....ridge.html

    The second camera rolled as Etheridge, irritated, held the wrist of the first cameraman, then pulled the student to his side and grabbed him in a hug.

    Which is correct. Only i find it funny that Drudge is posting a Weigel article and classifying it as an out of touch lefty trying to defend the actions of a congressmen gone mad.

  46. BeesInTheBrain   15 years ago

    Actually the charge should be "forcible confinement".

  47. Etheridge   15 years ago

    He was not unresponsive.

  48. Rick   15 years ago

    The best part is where is steals the kids phone and he gets away with shoving him, tearing at his jacket, and twisting his arm, man this is the guy - http://www.kooks.com/congress/.....Phone.html

  49. hbenesh   15 years ago

    NO longer do many in Washington work for us nor do they act as such.. It is time to throw them all out of office and begin again. This video shows exactly what happens when someone has been in public office too long. Either this Etheridge has been drinking, he is diloginal, or too old to be in his right mind because this guy is nutz!!

  50. hbenesh   15 years ago

    Etheridge must have thought that the college student was a terrorist spy, or possibly "WHO ARE YOU?" is his secret password and needed to hear the rest something like, " And the eagle flies due south come winter".. Maybe he was looking for his mother, "WHO ARE YOU? , are you my MOTHER??? Why so paranoid? Weirdest thing I have ever seen , except if you are a child abuser.... Who in their right mind acts like this???? Quiet you insane basterd ..... Or stop your early morning drug use...

  51. Osamabinhiding   15 years ago

    The congressman needs to go on bully beat down

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court

Autumn Billings | 6.5.2025 3:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!