Reason Writers Around Town: Peter Suderman in The Daily Caller on the Cost of Health Care Reform in Massachusetts
At Tucker Carlson's brand-spankin'-new political news site, The Daily Caller, Associate Editor Peter Suderman looks at the costs of health care reform in Massachusetts:
In 2006, the state of Massachusetts passed a sweeping overhaul of the state's health-care system. The system, which influenced the Obama administration's plans for national reform, has since faced unexpected and unchecked growth in costs, both to the government and individuals, forcing the government to cut benefits and raise taxes. Now analysts say that without significant policy changes, the program's long-term viability is in doubt.
State officials have successfully increased health insurance coverage in the state: With only 2.6 percent of the population now lacking health insurance, its insurance rate is the highest in the nation. But high coverage levels have been achieved at a substantial price, and one that is expected to increase over time.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Suderman is associate editor of The Daily Caller?
No way dude, are you for real? Wow thats like WAY cool is it not??
RTR
http://www.anonymity-tools.ru.tc
Proof possitive that Suderman is also anonymitybot.
What is really cool is when I inhale a tool and spooge shoots out of my nose.
But the CBO and dear Leader has costs and their future projections under control!
Lalalala...budget neutral...I'm not listening!...lalala...
But high coverage levels have been achieved at a substantial price, and one that is expected to increase over time.
I think right here we have the explanation for pushing thru ObamaCare as fast as possible instead of waiting to see how MassCare shakes out first.
unexpected and unchecked growth in costs
"Unchecked" anyway.
Unexpected by whom?
skyrocketing public expenses already have resulted an increased cigarette tax of $1 a pack, as well as $89 million in new fees on the health-care industry
Help me out here. MassCare is government subsidized. The additional $89 million in taxes will only increase the cost of health care. So why add taxes on health care when you'll only have to give that right back in subsidies?
thanks