Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

The Judge Said the Case's Outcome Turned on Poor Briefing

Radley Balko | 10.26.2009 3:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Why yes, I am linking to this story about a frivolous lawsuit just so I could use that headline.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Peril of Palatability

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

PolicyProduct Liability
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (54)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Brandybuck   16 years ago

    Only someone with massive testicles could have filed such a suit. Lesser men would have withered in shame for bringing such a matter before a court. I must conclude that the girth of the gonads must have indeed gapped his shorts.

  2. Bergholt Stuttley Johnson   16 years ago

    I totally agree with the author of that piece. Wtf kind of dude ignores penile chafing until he can barely walk? Unless he has one of those horrible conditions SugarFree likes to write about...

    But I guess the real lesson here is that one should wear boxers.

  3. Crackers Boy   16 years ago

    His evidence was limp, at best.

    CB

    1. Paul   16 years ago

      And his arguments flaccid.

  4. Attorney   16 years ago

    I'm pleased to see that the guy appeared pro se. IOW, he did not find a lawyer willing to take this case.

    1. PapayaSF   16 years ago

      It's still argument #52,689 for "loser pays."

  5. SugarFree   16 years ago

    The astoundingly stupid part is that he ties the on-going damage to his penis to the fact that he cannot visually examine it. He has no feeling in his penis? I can the underwear touching my penis right down, with no chafing at all.

    And as someone who has drunkenly chafed his penis on one memorable occasion, it's not something you just ignore for a few days. Walking is agony.

    1. Mrs Sugarfree   16 years ago

      Don't ask me to look at it...

  6. Episiarch   16 years ago

    This, folks, is why I go commando.

    And as someone who has drunkenly chafed his penis on one memorable occasion

    Yeah, but what did the mechanical bull look like afterward?

    1. SugarFree   16 years ago

      It was in worse shape than me. Trust.

    2. Pope Jimbo   16 years ago

      Chafed Johnson is an indicator of a mechanical sheep (not a bull). You can find them in all the finer cowboy bars in Montana.

  7. Xeones   16 years ago

    Epi, you really don't want to know.

  8. SugarFree   16 years ago

    I can't do commando. I need a measure of junk confinement and control. Don't like boxers either. I always feel like I straddling a fence. It's fancy nuthuggers all the way for me. Rowr.

  9. SugarFree   16 years ago

    My favorite penis injury story comes from Lovelines the MTV show that afflicted the world with Adam Carolla.

    The caller was having his girlfriend cowgirl him in chair, they got out of rhythm, his penis slipped out and she came down on him. His penis bent double with "an audible crack." For the last six months "the middle of his penis to the tip won't get hard." When he asked Dr. Drew for help, the aghast Drew just sort of nervously laughed and shrugged.

    1. Bergholt Stuttley Johnson   16 years ago

      See, Radley, this is why you never ever post anything remotely genital-related on H&R. If we wanted insights into the insane fucked-upness that is SugarFree's mind, we'd read his blog goddammit.

      1. SugarFree   16 years ago

        More genital posts! MORE I SAY!

        1. Pope Jimbo   16 years ago

          No matter what they tell you ("it isn't the number of posts, but the quality of the bloggin"), EVERYONE is looking for a blog with 12 genital posts a day. To be honest, they'd be thrilled with 9 posts a day.

          The sad truth, though, is that most blogs only have 5-6 genital related posts per day (even those blogs that cover african-american issues, no matter what the stereotypes say).

          1. Bergholt Stuttley Johnson   16 years ago

            This reminds me that I have not read a single Feministring or Jezebel thread today. SF, do thine office.

            1. SugarFree   16 years ago

              Not the usual suspects: 30 Rock's Ableism

              1. Dagny T.   16 years ago

                This just showed up on Balko's always informative Twitter feed.

                Radley, I'm hoping you saw this here, and aren't as compelled as Sug to troll lesser-known feminist sites.

                1. Bergholt Sidney Johnson   16 years ago

                  No one reads lesser known feminist sites but lesser-known feminists and SugarFree. The rest of us read the choicer bits when he links to them. That is his function in society.

                  If SugarFree did not exist, we would have to invent him.

                  1. Bergholt Sidney Johnson   16 years ago

                    Of course, if SugarFree did not exist, the men on this forum would not have had a ghastly penile fracture story seared into their memory - thereby proving that Life is full of trade-offs.

          2. franz kafka   16 years ago

            genital-related

    2. Slut Bunwalla   16 years ago

      No no noooooo

      I did not need to know that this could actually happen!

      AAGGGHHHHH now I'm going to think of this every freaking time I have sex for the rest of my life!

      I HATE YOU

      1. SugarFree   16 years ago

        Reading anything I write is emotional Russian Roulette. Everyday I try to make this place more like The Deer Hunter.

    3. Groovus Maximus   16 years ago

      Fractured Penis is the DX associated with this presentation, SF.

      More on pathology and TX here.

    4. The Gobbler   16 years ago

      Best junk story ever:

      Back in the '70s there was this rep for Nissan trampolines. The guy was phenomenal, bouncing higher than anyone while doing amazing tricks. He did this in a business suit and holding a brief case.

      Long story short, one day while doing his shtick, he missed the bed of the trampoline and ended up straddling a spring. As his weight bore down on the spring, it opened up. And then it clamped onto one of his balls. Because there's no way a couple of people can pull a trampoline spring open (they are very tight) they had to remove the spring and the take the poor fucker to the hospital to have it removed.

      True story.

  10. Bergholt Stuttley Johnson   16 years ago

    I need a measure of junk confinement and control

    My theory is that such preferences naturally lead brief-wearers to authoritarian tendencies. This is why briefs are the underwear of choice for statists and Peace Prize winners (and also explains why Gandhi never won).

    1. SugarFree   16 years ago

      Self-ownership means I get to swaddle my junk however I like.

  11. anarch   16 years ago

    Junk bonds?

  12. swillfredo pareto   16 years ago

    I'm pleased to see that the guy appeared pro se. IOW, he did not find a lawyer willing to take this case.

    As I said to Melvin Belli the other day you can put it in the hands of your attorney but it will never stand up in court.

    Happy 40th to Monty Python.

  13. Xeones   16 years ago

    He testified he is a "belly-man" and his "weight" prevents him from looking down and seeing his penis.

    ...Warty?

    Why is "weight" in quotes?

    1. SugarFree   16 years ago

      It's worded like that in the link.

    2. anarch   16 years ago

      I know! I know!

      It's because he meant girth but, out of force of metonymic habit, because he's used to speaking of losing and gaining weight rather than girth, said weight instead of girth, and all the lawyers had to use his words when citing his complaint, especially if they wanted to show his imprecision suggesting ignorance suggesting the invalidity of his case.

      And IANevenAL!

      1. Bergholt Sidney Johnson   16 years ago

        Well I can certainly see why one might be reluctant to use the word "girth" in this situation.

        1. PapayaSF   16 years ago

          You're all assuming that a guy who's too dim to notice that his underwear isn't on correctly is bright enough to know the word "girth."

  14. Xeones   16 years ago

    I know, Sweet'n'Low, and that is what i am curious about.

    Can we all just agree that "belly-man" is a phrase that needs to be used around here a lot more often?

    1. SugarFree   16 years ago

      "Belly-man" sounds like a phrase from 1930s blues.

      And seriously, you have to be pretty fat not to be able to see your dick without the aid of a mirror.

  15. Freedonian   16 years ago

    * I'm running out of family-friendly euphemisms for "johnson."

    Now, that's classic!

  16. Death Panelist   16 years ago

    If there's any justice, next he'll sue Hawaii and his wife. (Not necessarily in that order.)

  17. scape   16 years ago

    The judge tried not to laugh,
    while seperating the wheat from the chaff.
    As the plaintiff claimed, his Hanes caused him pain
    and that his new briefs weren't safe,
    by connecting the meat with the chafe.

    1. anarch   16 years ago

      Albert Finally Freed.

  18. Dagny T.   16 years ago

    My favorite part is how he didn't ask his wife to take a look because "he would never ask her to do such a thing." Whatever it is fatties do in bed, I'm pretty sure he's not doing it right.

  19. R C Dean   16 years ago

    To be fair, nearly any married man would be reluctant to ask his spouse if his dick had been rubbed raw. That is a guaranteed no-win conversation.

  20. Paul   16 years ago

    Speaking for those who are extremely well endowed... I can say that penis chafing will not continue unabated for very long.

    1. Bergholt Sidney Johnson   16 years ago

      What does your having big tits have to do with anything, Paul?

    2. Dagny T.   16 years ago

      penis chafing will not continue unabated un-'bated for very long.

      FTFY

  21. Paul   16 years ago

    I wanna meet the lawyer to who took this case... or maybe I don't.

  22. Your Good Buddy Johnny Clarke   16 years ago

    He claims he can't see his dick because his belly is so big. It is also possible that his dick is just really short.

  23. matthew h   16 years ago

    Hard cases make bad lore.

  24. B   16 years ago

    Are there no stores in Hawaii where this dude could have bought a new fucking pair of underwear, or would spending ten dollars have ruined his "dream vacation"? Seriously, how fucking stupid do you have to be to actually spend the time and money filing a case like this against a company with megadeep pockets? What a tool.

  25. jpocali   16 years ago

    You don't even need to buy new undies, you are in freakin Hawaii! Put on the freakin swimsuit like you should have done in the first place! Crap, I do it here in Minnesota, it is called freakin laundry day!

  26. hmm   16 years ago

    As the saying goes. You can't do biddness with a soar Peter. Hence the reason you don't rob Paul.

  27. Rachel Maddow   16 years ago

    He should have been part of the Tea Party Movement. The teabaggers would have diagnosed him right quick.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!