Gene Healy: Abolish the DHS
In his column for the D.C. Examiner this week, Reason contributor Gene Healy says the Ridge terror alert revelations shouldn't be surprising, because the entire agency is driven by politics:
Since its creation in 2003, the department has done little to provide genuine security and much to encourage a pernicious politics of fear. We'd be better off without it…
The Homeland Security Advisory System is a case in point. Even before Ridge's revelation, two separate studies showed that Bush received a boost to his approval ratings with each escalation of the terror threat level. The warning has been raised above yellow ("elevated") 16 times, but it's never been lowered to blue or green, the bottom rungs on DHS's Ladder of Fear. Yet, with Spinal Tap logic ("this goes to 11!") the department insists on keeping all five levels.
And no politician wants to be the one who has to explain why there was a terror attack after he lowered the threat level to green (signal to terrorists: guard's down, attack now!).
The department itself is a dog's breakfast of 22 federal agencies brought together in the hope of providing better coordination on a common mission. But turf battles left key antiterror agencies like the FBI out of the reorganization, and DHS finished last or next to last on every measure of employee morale in a 2006 Office of Personnel Management study.
The truth, as analyst Jeffrey Rosen points out, is that DHS is 'an institutional money pit that has more to do with symbols than substance." Indeed, a congressional investigation in 2008 documented some $15 billion in failed contracts that have run wildly over budget or been cancelled before completion.
This will never happen, of course. Proposing new cabinet-level agencies is bold and visionary. Suggesting we do away with useless and wasteful agencies is typically dismissed as fringe craziness.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And that's not even getting into the the Blut und Boden sound of the name.
__________ is 'an institutional money pit that has more to do with symbols than substance."
Whoops, looks like someone misplaced the original copy of this article. Can someone kindly name that government agency?
Exhibit A: "are you suggesting we not secure our homeland?"
End of argument
"are you suggesting we not secure our homeland?"
Please advise what Department of Defense means to you and then we'll talk.
Exhibit A: "are you suggesting we not secure our homeland?"
Isn't that what the Department of Defense is for?
__________ is 'an institutional money pit that has more to do with symbols than substance."
Whoops, looks like someone misplaced the original copy of this article. Can someone kindly name that government agency?
I got this one:
The Federal government is 'an institutional money pit that has more to do with symbols than substance.'
What do i win?
Isn't that what the Department of Defense is for?
So there really *is* a "Department of Redundancy Department"?
What do i win?
Forcibed psychiatric institutionalization until you're cured of your racism and nihilism.
What do i win?
X, how about this?
Forcibed?: For all your non-consensual therapy needs
I used to be skeptical about the idea of the same people who brought us the USPS and the war in Iraq administering the healthcare of 300 million people. But now I'm totally on board. Yes We Can!
Thanks Forcibed!
The warning has been raised above yellow ("elevated") 16 times, but it's never been lowered to blue or green, the bottom rungs on DHS's Ladder of Fear.
Maybe the colors should be rejiggered so that they match Kryten's system-status indicator.
Combining a bunch of related agencies into one does make some sense, even if it wasn't complete.
I check the advisory system every morning before work, so I know whether or not I should carry an umbrella.
The warning has been raised above yellow ("elevated") 16 times, but it's never been lowered to blue or green, the bottom rungs on DHS's Ladder of Fear.
But has it ever reached Blackwatch Plaid?
"""Isn't that what the Department of Defense is for?"""
No, they are for waging wars on foreign soil.
Why think so small? Abolishing DHS should be just a start.
"""Isn't that what the Department of Defense is for?"""
No, they are for waging wars on foreign soil.
Right. DHS is for waging war on our own soil.
HUGE difference.
And John Longtorso? It reached blackwatch plaid for 18 minutes on January 23, 2003. However, it was to confusing for Bush since he still has trouble with primary and secondary colors and was quickly dropped.
Really?
You sure about that?
Rights are only rights if you can freely exercise them even when it makes lots of people nervous.
So context means jack shit.
When will Obama change the threat level color?
We've been at threat level "orange" for a while, let's try threat level "hot pink" and see what happens!
When will Obama change the threat level color?
RACIST!!!
the other alan | August 25, 2009, 12:49pm | #
Exhibit A: "are you suggesting we not secure our homeland?"
End of argument
Not end of argument. My answer to your question is Yes, I am suggesting we not secure our homeland.
Is now the time to bring Security Kabuki? Or that the Israelis, who actually know a thing or two about airline security, think our airport security is a sad pathetic joke?
Actual LP talking points:
1. What do we need the DHS or even the DoD for? We're the strongest country in the world!
2. Let's all, like, abolwhatever, you know, like, get rid of, you know, like, the DHS, and all like live in like you know peace and harmony with like you know nature.
Shut the fuck up Lone Whackoff
This rock keeps terrorists away.
Okay, just what do we need DHS and DOD for? Answer your own question. Let's see if you can give an answer that's even vaguely coherent.
The TSA, a subsidiary of DHS, is a very important program that provides well-paying job opportunities for high-school dropouts.
Well, we could get rid of DHS and replace it with FedEx.
Or we could get rid of DHL and replace it with DHS.
Actual LoneWhackoff talking points:
1. Reason is staffed by assholes, because the posts I make on Hit and Run don't boost by blog's Technorati score. That's not fair.
2. I bet MexicanImmigrants who post here get Technorati points, though. At American taxpayer expense.
3. Immigrants are destroying America, and if you don't believe me just remember that if my ancestors hadn't emigrated here, I wouldn't be stinking up the body politic today.
4. My mother's legs were in America when I first emerged from between them. That proves my superiority over those people whose mothers' legs were in less desirable countries.
5. Like for example the country where Barack Hussein Socialist Muslim Obama was born.
To be fair, Reason is staffed by assholes. And Suderman appears to have demonstrated a racist streak.
Granted, it's more of a "soft" racism.
To be fair, Reason is staffed by assholes.
Well, it's staffed by libertarians. I realize the venn diagram of the two groups doesn't overlap 100%, but it's pretty damned close.
Oh, Jennifer, how I appreciate you. You are a red-haired artiste; words are your paint, and deeply deluded morons are your canvas. Bravo!
Jake, you're still alive? I thought you were destroyed in the Great Purge of Twenty-Aught-Two.
I have decided that my purpose in life is to work for DHS.
This rock keeps terrorists away.
If only it were that simple.
Apparently, only an eternal flame (a really, really BIG one), fueled by federal reserve notes, will keep terrorists away.
Episiarch,
You know what would be fun? To see how outrageously you could act without getting fired. Start small, then ratchet it up. Encourage your co-workers to out-outrageous you through gambling pools. Secretly blog your achievements.
?Close your eyes, give me your hand, darling
Do you feel my heart beating, do you understand?
Do you feel the same, am I only dreaming?
Is this burning an eternal flame??
I have decided that my purpose in life is to work for DHS.
I just found out that a friend of mine is just starting with the DHS a few weeks from now. It was a surprise, to say the least.
No, they are for waging wars on foreign soil.
So, if anyone invades US soil, the Army et al. stands down, and the ranked masses of DHS repel the invader?
Getcher popcorn ready!
To see how outrageously you could act without getting fired.
Fucking up at the DHS? He'd be running the place in two years.
Be an honest employee and interact with everyone under good faith. They'd bounce your ass out on the street in a month.
I just found out that a friend of mine is just starting with the DHS a few weeks from now.
Stay on his good side, and maybe he'll share the loot seized at checkpoints. So far I've "donated" a fine cigar lighter and a really nice pocketknife. Both gifts from my father, the terrorist bastard.
I am physically incapable of being a bad enough an employee to "excel" at DHS.
I am physically incapable of being a bad enough an employee to "excel" at DHS.
Does that mean you're not strong enough to tip a wheelchair over? Pussy.
I'm being quasi-serious here. Obviously, there are some lines that can't be safely crossed. For instance, if Agent Episiarch were to regularly fondle the bosoms of young, traveling nuns, that would likely get him fired. Or at least sternly reprimanded under union rules. But I bet there's a lot of stuff you could get away with, especially if you made it clear to the victims that what you were doing was authorized under USA Patriot.
if Agent Episiarch were to regularly fondle the bosoms of young, traveling nuns, that would likely get him fired
Regularly? Yep. Every once in a while when the female frisking officer is taking a 10 minute bathroom break? You betcha.
P Brooks, don't make me detain you. I can do a cavity search on you.
No, wait, I think you've got something here. Make it so that every federal employee is a member of a military reserve organization for the entire duration of his/her employment with the federal government. Make sure these reserve units are first in line for call up. This makes it easy to reduce the size of government _and_ address our pressing overseas military issues at the same time! Worried that the federal bureaucracy is getting too thick? Start a weed-out war!
On a slightly related note, has there ever been a case of a war started by Congress (the official sponsors of war under the Constitution, ya know) as a direct result of petitioning of that august representative body by its actual electors/constituents?
"""So, if anyone invades US soil, the Army et al. stands down, and the ranked masses of DHS repel the invader?"""
It was mostly a joke, relax.
But by practical standards, when was the last time the DOD was used to fight a war on our soil? Never?
db,
Don't know, but I wrote a paper in my National Security Law class in law school on whether a president could veto a declaration of war. I came up with that topic thinking about what would happen if a popular war got declared but a sane president opposed it. In practice, it probably doesn't matter, because the Commander-in-Chief could drag his feet without exercising a veto, but it was one of those unanswered questions.
This is semi off topic; I apologize.
I graduated from IU in May. I am not having luck finding a job. I have applied for several government (local and state and federal, oh my!) positions. It makes me physically ill to click "submit" on these shits. I do get consolation that, if accepted, I'll likely be subversive as to bring the place down from the inside.
I'd like to do this. I doubt I'll be hired.
God damn it! I'm eating ramen like twice a day and am possibly going to become a substitute teacher. I hate my life and I want to die.
ev,
No, no, your path towards government subversion is a good one. I was NSF funded at the beginning of my legal career, and I occasionally insinuated my libertarianness into the work (one time was when I questioned in an official paper the whole concept of universal service in telecommunications).
A couple of years ago when I was thinking about leaving my job, the Customs and Border Patrol were after me to come work with them.
I told their recruiter that I couldn't possibly do it because I would never wear a mustache. Also, my response to finding a bunch of immigrants in a container at the shipyards would be to look both ways, say "ssshhh" and gently close the door.
mk,
Like jury nullification but different: Bureaucratic nullification.
"""Also, my response to finding a bunch of immigrants in a container at the shipyards would be to look both ways, say "ssshhh" and gently close the door."""
Come on, you suppose to bribe them for your "ssshhh". No "ssshhh" unless each of you gives me 10 bucks.
I mentioned a while back in the Libertarian President Top 100 I drafted during the last presidential election season that I thought we should bill countries that "allowed" their citizens to illegally emigrate to the U.S.:
On second thought, though, maybe we should charge every immigrant directly--legal or otherwise. $50K, and you're a citizen!
Jake, you're still alive? I thought you were destroyed in the Great Purge of Twenty-Aught-Two.
No, I survived 2002; I hid behind DONDEROOOOOO!!! and he took the bullet meant for me. Apparently didn't finish him off, though, more's the pity.
My posting activities are largely limited to the Not Really Secret Site That Starts With G, if you know what I mean. I still read H&R pretty regularly, though.
Ah, the Site that Shall Not be Named. It's hard to juggle multiple blogs when you like to comment (let alone post), I agree.
JB, did that billboard thingy you were helping to organize ever transpire? Never heard much else about it...
Somebody should do a Where are They Now? for all the lost Hit & Run posters. And actually find out where they are posting now, so that we can go abuse them.
JB, did that billboard thingy you were helping to organize ever transpire?
No, it never did. The problem was we couldn't find a picture of the guy, and nobody lived close enough to drive out and take one. And the billboard really needed a photo. Now that the Supremes have weighed in, though, the impetus for the billboard has pretty much evaporated.
You should've asked Nick. He took a picture of my house and stuck it on the cover of his magazine, which he proceeded to send to me. I figured it was some kind of warning, like that time when the Turk sent Sonny Luca's bullet-proof vest with some fresh fish.
Secret site? Do you mean the Obamatarian's who hate KM-W?
The "lost commenters" occasionally pop in here to call libertarians racist.
If this is where we are heading, we all might as well move to some third world country where government bureaucrats demand and receive bribes regularly to allow the peasants to go about their lives. We might as well do it soon, too and just get the pain of the change over with.
Time to buy some "Rosetta Stone" software.
Secret site? Do you mean the Obamatarian's who hate KM-W?
You've got the link right (if not the apostrophe), but I'm not sure where you get the idea that we're "Obamatarians". In general, we weren't particularly fond of the last guy in that office, nor are we particularly fond of the current one.
(BTW, the poll you linked to came out right about the time KMW wrote that horrid piece defending the idea of making innocent people pay before receiving the privilege of due process, IIRC.)
Anyway, our lovely and talented site admin, Ellie, invites anyone who wants to find some of the "lost commenters" to head on over. The place is called Grylliade.
We at Urkobold are fond of Ellie and her art.
On the bright side, any country that invades and conquers the US has to pay off the National Debt.
In general, we weren't particularly fond of the last guy in that office, nor are we particularly fond of the current one.
Although quite a few announced they would be voting for the current President.Some were downright gushing over the promise of "hope and change".
Although the comments don't indicate the "votes" I assumed the KM-W hate was simple jealousy as she is so much smarter and better looking than you bitches.
(The apostrophe was accidently left in after a composing edit.My apologies)
Our debt is like a wall surrounding North America. Through fiscal irresponsibility comes strength.
Jake,
Your link/my apostrophe.
We can call it even.
Correct link for anyone who thinks even the "cosmotarians" are nihilist wingnuts Schoolgirls of all genders welcome.
"""On the bright side, any country that invades and conquers the US has to pay off the National Debt."""
At first I was LOL and then I thought, wait a moment, didn't that happen to us in Iraq?
"...when was the last time the DOD was used to fight a war on our soil? Never?"
As the Department of Defense, I don't believe it has. As the Department of War I would point you to certain events in the early 1940's you may be familiar with.
Yeah? Well what does Ted Healy say?
Absolutely.
I would expect the Department of War to do war. I would expect the Department of Defense to do defense. I guess they really do, but it seems to be defending foreigners from their problems. Maybe that's the root of the problem, if we still had the Department of War, we would have committed to waging war instead of waging defense.
Your link/my apostrophe.
We can call it even.
Fair enough. Thanks for the corrected link.
Though you're wildly off-base with your characterization of the Grylliaders.