Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Souter Ends…

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 5.1.2009 3:28 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

…women and minorities hardest hit.

(Relevant joke here.)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: You Can't Say That On Television

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PoliticsSupreme Court
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (59)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jesse Walker   16 years ago

    In the oldest version of that joke that I've seen, from the early '60s, it was the then-liberal New York Post that used the "hardest hit" headline. Obviously, that one doesn't work anymore...

  2. Jordan   16 years ago

    We're extending Title IX to science and engineering. Why not the Supreme Court too? This country is fucked.

  3. Warren   16 years ago

    So long Dipshit. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

    Here's to a long protracted confirmation bloodbath.

  4. J sub D   16 years ago

    I am genuinely amazed that Jenny Granholm gets mentioned. Her ascension to the SCOTUS would violate the Peter Principle since her tenure as governor of my fair state has been marked by nothing but incompetence.

  5. SugarFree   16 years ago

    Homer: We played Dungeons & Dragons for three hours! Then I was slain by an elf.

    Bart: Listen to yourself, man: you're hangin' with nerds.

    Homer: You take that back!

    Marge: Homer, please! These boys sound very nice, but they're clearly nerds.

    Homer: Really? But nerds are my mortal enemy!

    Lisa: Dad, nerds are nothing to fear. In fact, they've done some pretty memorable things. Some nerds of note include...popcorn magnate Orville Redenbacher, rock star David Byrne, and supreme court justice David Souter.

    Homer: [gasp] Oh, not Souter! Oh, no!

  6. Episiarch   16 years ago

    I am genuinely amazed that Jenny Granholm gets mentioned.

    Awesome, my joke prediction from the other thread is coming real. Wait, that's not awesome at all.

  7. MNG   16 years ago

    "Marge: "Look, Homer. Do you want Bart to grow up being Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, or a cheesy male stripper?"

    Homer: "Can't he be both, like the late Earl Warren??"

    Marge: "Earl Warren wasn't a stripper!!!"

    Homer: "NOW whose being naive???"

  8. mark   16 years ago

    I just don't understand how legal analysts can actually say out loud "he is looking to pick a minority or woman candidate". What does that even mean? Why is that even the slightest of considerations?

  9. The Angry Optimist   16 years ago

    mark - ask MNG, he thinks we're supposed to derive some significance from all the white dudes up there.

    What I don't understand about the the drive to pick a woman or a minority is this: Doesn't Obama have those two constituencies as a lock anyway? Why not toss a bone to moderates and look like a centrist?

  10. robc   16 years ago

    If Obama picks me for SCOTUS, I will accept.

  11. Jaybird   16 years ago

    He's obviously going to give the nomination to Biden.

    I'd start worrying about who he's going to pick as the next vice-president.

  12. Mike M.   16 years ago

    He should strive to maintain consistency on the court and pick a closeted gay man who lives with his mother.

  13. Guess My Bra Size   16 years ago

    MNG

    Actually seeing where you get your news and analysis explains a lot.

  14. Episiarch   16 years ago

    He should strive to maintain consistency on the court and pick a closeted gay man who lives with his mother.

    Neil Patrick Harris? Doogie Howser for SCOTUS!

  15. Glenda -- The Good Witch   16 years ago

    "He should strive to maintain consistency on the court and pick a closeted gay man who lives with his mother."

    You mean Tim Cavanaugh?

  16. John   16 years ago

    "I am genuinely amazed that Jenny Granholm gets mentioned. Her ascension to the SCOTUS would violate the Peter Principle since her tenure as governor of my fair state has been marked by nothing but incompetence."

    We don't use the Peter Principle anymore. Now it is the Dilbert Principle. The Dilbert Principle says that we promote someone based on incompetance to a position high enough to prevent them from doing too much damage. Given that being on the Supreme Court would prevvent Granhom from further destroying Michigan and only allow her to do damage where she can get four other justices to agree with her, putting Granhom on the Supreme Court would be a brilliant stroke of the Dillbert Principle.

  17. John   16 years ago

    The Supreme Court has a Jewish seat, a black seat, and a cloested a-sexual gay man seat. don't let the last one go unfilled after the loss of Sueter.

  18. John   16 years ago

    BTW,

    The best joke ever told is the the NYT world ends minorities and women hit hardest joke, not the Bee Arther one referenced yesterday.

  19. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Hey, that's right, I'm an attorney. I'll do it. What the hell.

  20. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Like Hugo Black, I was born in Alabama. I'm also a minority--I'm male.

  21. John   16 years ago

    Pro,

    Can you fill the sexually ambiguous closeted gay man seat? If not, I am sorry but you can't have the job.

  22. brotherben   16 years ago

    Pro Lib, Won't the sweet transvestite gear under the robe kinda creep out some of the others?

  23. Episiarch   16 years ago

    "...and then the hooker says 'let's go, the room's already paid for!' HAHAHAHAHAHAHA"

  24. Gilbert Martin   16 years ago

    I heard a sound bite on the radio of Obama praising Souter for, amother things, "not being an absolutist".

    Quite an odd thing to praise him for, seeing as how the law in general and the Constitution in particular are chock full of absolutes.

    Just another indication that the liberal mind is full of mush.

  25. John   16 years ago

    "Pro Lib, Won't the sweet transvestite gear under the robe kinda creep out some of the others?"

    Naw, him and Ruth Bader can shop for sexy longerei together. It will be great.

  26. The Angry Optimist   16 years ago

    the Constitution in particular [is] chock full of absolutes.

    Just to get this clear, Gilbert, what is your view of the Ninth Amendment?

  27. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Well, no, I'm heterosexual. And I don't think I'm willing to pull a Tootsie to get nominated to the Supreme Court.

    Crap.

    However. . .I am from a group that has traditionally been oppressed and maligned as well as discriminated against. I'm a libertarian.

  28. J sub D   16 years ago

    I'm taking up a collection to buy John a dictionary. Who's in?

  29. Hazel Meade   16 years ago

    How much do you want to bet he pick a Hispanic?

  30. John   16 years ago

    J Sub D,

    "I" "O" what is the difference? I am not spelling challenged as much as typing challenged. If you ask me how to spell a word I can tell you. If I go to type it my mind goes ahead of my fingers and it ends in disaster.

  31. kevrob   16 years ago

    ...sweet transvestite gear under the robe...

    Uhhh....

    Isn't the robe STG?

    Kevin

  32. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Hazel,

    Hey, wait, I'm back in! My wife is half-Colombian! Mi casa es su casa.

  33. brotherben   16 years ago

    Can he nominate his wife? A successful black woman that has the same baby-daddy for both her kids? Serious minority status.

  34. FrBunny   16 years ago

    that has the same baby-daddy for both her kids [citation needed]

  35. Gilbert Martin   16 years ago

    "Just to get this clear, Gilbert, what is your view of the Ninth Amendment?"

    My view is that it is listed smack dab between the 8th and 10th Amendments.

  36. John   16 years ago

    "Can he nominate his wife? A successful black woman that has the same baby-daddy for both her kids? Serious minority status."

    Sure. But that is awefully bourgouis of her to have kids by the same man. I think that might be threatening to Obama and bring up his issues regarding his deadbeat father.

  37. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    What about Angelina Jolie? I believe no Tattoo-American has ever served on the Court. And she's definitely female.

  38. bigbigslacker   16 years ago

    His wife wouldn't take the job. It's not a no-show position and it doesn't pay enough.

    On the subject of first biatch: I've been seeing/hearing stories lately on how much everyone adores Mrs. Obama. It seems to me reporters are trying to create this bit of news out of thin air. Or am I out of touch? I have yet to hear a single real-life person talk in a positive way about Mrs. O. And not much negative talk either. I've yet to meet anyone who really cares much at all about her one way or another.

    I think only one person has said anything to me about their dog either. Maybe I'm just blessed.

  39. robc   16 years ago

    I believe no Tattoo-American has ever served on the Court.

    Sandra Day O'Connor.

  40. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    robc,

    Really? What of? Where?

  41. robc   16 years ago

    I have yet to hear a single real-life person talk in a positive way about Mrs. O. And not much negative talk either. I've yet to meet anyone who really cares much at all about her one way or another.

    This may make her one of the best first ladies in, at least, recent history.

  42. robc   16 years ago

    Really? What of? Where?

    I just assumed.

  43. brotherben   16 years ago

    Pro Lib,Ginsburg has a tat of a butterfly right next to the landing strip she keeps nicely waxed.

  44. John   16 years ago

    BiBigslacker,

    I live in a neighborhood full of liberals. Me and one woman up the street were the only ones who didn't vote for Obama in my neighborhood. I have never heard one person say one thing about the first biatch. I work with Dem operatives and they don't have much to say either. The media desparately wants her to be Jacki Kennedy. Sorry, no dice.

  45. robc   16 years ago

    Ginsburg has a tat of a butterfly right next to the landing strip she keeps nicely waxed.

    And a racing flag tramp stamp.

  46. Episiarch   16 years ago

    And a racing flag tramp stamp.

    I think I'm going to puke. Labial piercings too?

  47. brotherben   16 years ago

    Epi, careful. you'll chip a tooth.

  48. Fists of Furry   16 years ago

    "And a racing flag tramp stamp."

    I recently read somewhere that originally, it was a Confederate flag and that she had it altered as soon as she was tapped to be on the Supreme Court.

  49. Mike   16 years ago

    I nominate a penny. Flip it, and

    heads = affirm the earlier decision
    tails = reverse the earlier decision

    The coin will do a lot better than Souter or anyone Obama is going to appoint.

  50. Fists of Furry   16 years ago

    "Labial piercings too?"

    No, clit.

  51. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    I hear she has a tattoo of Pudsey Bear on her pudsey bear.

  52. Episiarch   16 years ago

    HUGE VULVA

  53. Gilbert Martin   16 years ago

    "Labial piercings too?"

    "No, clit."

    Are you deliberatly trying to make EVERYBODY lose their lunch?

  54. The Angry Optimist   16 years ago

    bigbigslacker - celebrities practically wax lyrical about how elegant and well-dressed and blah blah blah she is...

  55. Brandybuck   16 years ago

    Pudsey Bear Piercings

  56. Paul   16 years ago

    woman, hispanic or both"

    Maybe they could add gay, disabled and Jewish.

    We'd end up with a compassionate, well dressed differently-abled person with a inbred sense of guilt who'll do a job regular Americans aren't willing to do.

  57. jtuf   16 years ago

    I would love to see Obama pick a transgender judge with a penis just so I could see all the reporters panic over how to tabulate the gender totals.

  58. Invisible Finger   16 years ago

    I would love to see Obama pick a transgender judge with a penis just so I could see all the reporters panic over how to tabulate the gender totals.

    Holy shit. Janet Reno redux.

  59. Invisible Finger   16 years ago

    Isn't the robe STG?

    No, it's religious garb.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Attack on Iran Is Unlawful

Eric Boehm | 6.22.2025 11:20 AM

Does Drug Use Lead to Addiction, or Are Some Brains More Prone To Use Drugs?

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

An Empty Pool in Peru Is a Monument to the Drawbacks of Historic Preservation

Bekah Congdon | From the July 2025 issue

Trump Shreds the Constitution By Bombing Iran

Matthew Petti | 6.21.2025 11:04 PM

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!