Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Oh Stimulus, That Has Such Pork In It!

Nick Gillespie | 2.11.2009 4:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Senate and the House have apparently reached a compromise on their competing visions of stimulating the hell out of taxpayers' pockets:

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., one of the negotiators, earlier announced agreement to hold the bill to $789 billion, tens of billions below the cost of both the House and Senate bills that had cleared in recent days, and that 35 percent of the total would be in the form of tax cuts.

The reductions in the bill's size caused grumbles among liberal Democrats, who described them as a concession to the moderates, particularly Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who are under pressure from conservative Republicans to hold down spending.

The principal components of the emerging measure included money to help victims of the recession, as much as $44 billion in aid for states, which face cuts of their own as a result of lower tax receipts, and the president's proposed tax cut for lower and middle-income wage earners.

Negotiators tentatively agreed to include a one-time payment to recipients of Social Security, Supplemental Security Income and veterans' pensions and disability. While the size of the checks remained unsettled, officials said it would be less than the $300 originally proposed by the Senate.

Officials said there was agreement to accept the White House's call to provide the tax break to workers who pay Social Security taxes but do not earn enough to owe income taxes, although it was possible the amount would be scaled back somewhat. The president sought $500 for individuals and $1,000 for couples.

Working to accommodate the new, lower overall limit of the bill, negotiators effectively wiped out a Senate-passed provision for a new $15,000 tax credit to defray the cost of buying a home, these officials said. The agreement would allow taxpayers to deduct the sales tax paid on new car purchases, but not the interest on loans for the same vehicles.

More sketchy details that will make a grown man weep and a grown woman cry here.

Note the triumphant note in keeping the package under $800 billion, as if that's a sign of fiscal restraint rather than an unbuckling-your-pants-at-the-table-after-a-gigantic-meal-you-fat-fuck moment.

Once more with gusto! Just one more tiny, wafer-thin earmark, Mr. Creosote!

Update: Damon W. Root fills in more details.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Goes Hollywood: Freedom of Expression in the Age of Obama

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsEconomicsCapital MarketsStimulus
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (17)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. TallDave   16 years ago

    It's sad that I remember that picture.

  2. Xeones   16 years ago

    FUUUUUCK

  3. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Mr. Creosote keeps coming to mind as I watch the Voracity of Hope in action.

  4. phalkor   16 years ago

    YES! WE ARE WINNING!

  5. Jeff P   16 years ago

    "And don't skip on the pate!"

  6. Xeones   16 years ago

    "Bring me a bucket. And a cleaning woman."

  7. wingnutx   16 years ago

    Has congress "Moving with lightning speed" ever been a good thing?

  8. Warty   16 years ago

    At least I don't work for Jews.

  9. Ben   16 years ago

    So who is the taxpayer in that picture? The food, or the guy feeding the fat man? Or the toilet the fat man is going to use after the meal?

  10. J sub D   16 years ago

    Negotiators tentatively agreed to include a one-time payment to recipients of Social Security, Supplemental Security Income and veterans' pensions and disability. While the size of the checks remained unsettled, officials said it would be less than the $300 originally proposed by the Senate. [italics added]

    Keep the chump change and cut the bill in half. I can be bought, just not at that price.

  11. Curious George   16 years ago

    SSI? These are people who didn't work enough to get Social Security and often aren't even US citizens.

    All hail our Supreme Leader for his wisdom.

    And those of you who use the term pork have insulted the Supreme Leader.

    Racists!

  12. R C Dean   16 years ago

    $44 billion in aid for states

    Not stimulative.

    The agreement would allow taxpayers to deduct the sales tax paid on new car purchases, but not the interest on loans for the same vehicles.

    I thought we could already deduct sales taxes. [Google break]. Ah, in Texas we can, because we don't have an income tax, and the feds make you choose.

  13. MC   16 years ago

    Waiter: How are we feeling today?
    Mr Creosote: Better.
    Waiter: Better?
    Mr Creosote: Better get a bucket, I think I'm gonna puke!

    Or words, and feelings, to that effect.

  14. economist   16 years ago

    "So who is the taxpayer in that picture?"

    The bucket.

  15. libertymike   16 years ago

    Who Is Killing All The Great Stimulus Packages of Europe Lite?

  16. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Ben,

    We're the food.

  17. JB   16 years ago

    Pass this around to like-minded folks:

    http://nostimulus.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

The Criminal Justice System Was Found Guilty in the Karen Read Trial

Billy Binion | 6.21.2025 6:30 AM

Obama Adviser Jason Furman on Biden, Neoliberalism, and Keynesian Economics

Nick Gillespie | From the July 2025 issue

The Federal Government Owns Too Much Land. Selling It Helps Rural Communities.

Jack Nicastro | 6.20.2025 5:37 PM

A Judge's Order Freeing Mahmoud Khalil Is Yet Another Loss for the Trump Administration's Immigration Agenda

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.20.2025 4:41 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!