Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

"Under normal economic conditions we would prefer that markets determine the ultimate fate of private firms"

Matt Welch | 12.12.2008 10:18 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

By now, you should know what that means.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Roped and Trussed Just Like Dear Bettie Page

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyEconomicsCorporate WelfareGovernment SpendingCapital Markets
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (52)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. z   17 years ago

    Weren't TARP funds supposed to be allocated from the Secretary of the Treasury, without influence from political considerations from Congress or White House? Oh well, I guess they didn't mean it.

  2. Nigel Watt   17 years ago

    It means we're well and truly fucked.

  3. Benedict XVI   17 years ago

    Markets should determine everybody's fate. Interfering with the working of the Market is just unnatural. It's sacriligious! The Market is a divinely ordained disciplinary device.

    Hail Market,
    Full of grace,
    Prosperity is with thee.
    Blessed art thou among systems,
    and blessed is the fruit
    of thy womb, Capital.
    Holy Market,
    Mother of Goods,
    pray for us consumers now,
    and at the hour of our bankruptcy.
    Amen.

  4. P Brooks   17 years ago

    I wonder if CNBC is charging the UAW for the infomercial currently in progress.

    The sky is falling!!!!!!

  5. Reb Schneerson   17 years ago

    Baruch ata adoMarket, eloheinu melek ha-olam asherkideshanu be-mitzvotav ve-tzivanu lalekhet bankrupt.

  6. Alan Greenspan, Heretic   17 years ago

    "Over the past year, some of the critical pillars underlying market competition arguably have failed."

  7. George Soros, Heretic   17 years ago

    "This idea was called laissez faire in the nineteenth century... I have found a better name for it: market fundamentalism."

  8. Episiarch   17 years ago

    I already despised Bush, but for some reason his craven waffling on this entire issue is really stoking the flames of hatred. He has no fucking political capital to lose! Do the right fucking thing you utter tool.

  9. SugarFree   17 years ago

    Do the right fucking thing you utter tool.

    He literally can't. Every day is opposite day for George W. Bush.

  10. SIV   17 years ago

    Senator Jim DeMint(R-SC) suggested that if the bailout passes American workers will riot.I hope he is right.

  11. robc   17 years ago

    How is it even possible for a market to fail? A market is an abstract construct. If people trade good A for good B, a market exists. If people refuse to buy good A because it sucks (or any other reason), that doesnt mean the market has failed.

  12. robc   17 years ago

    SIV,

    Senator Jim DeMint(R-SC) suggested that if the bailout passes American workers will riot.I hope he is right.

    I doubt it.

    When the Kelo decision passed, those of us who support property rights should have showed up in CT armed and surrounded the house and refused to allow it to be taken. But we didnt.

    When this bailout talk started, a few million armed opponents should have showed up in DC and (like TN with the state income tax) circled the capitol building making noise and etc until a few congressman died and they gave up the idea. But we didnt.

    Etc...Etc...Etc

    I am part of the problem. But I dont see enough people to make being part of the solution happen.

  13. Lost_In_Translation   17 years ago

    for the love of god, GWB just keeps adding more condiments to this crap sandwich of a presidency.

    Democrats hated him and now he's determined to make republicans hate him too. May that man die unhonored, unwashed and in an unmarked grave (or in a marked grave under a urinal)

  14. sage   17 years ago

    What are normal economic conditions? Is there some magic number for growth, unemployment, inflation, etc., that qualifies as "normal?"

  15. cunnivore   17 years ago

    How is it even possible for a market to fail?

    The market failed in the sense that it "failed" to give them what they want. Sort of like Neanderthals would think evolution failed.

  16. Warren   17 years ago

    "Under normal economic conditions we would prefer that markets determine the ultimate fate of private firms,"

    AAAAARRRGGGHH!!!
    BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT

    I call Bull Shit. This makes the whole thing twice as rotten. These asshats have done nothing but manufacture pretexts for stuffing the public teat into their cronies gaping maws since day fucking one. And it's not even that they have the balls to deny their 100% corrupt and evil intent. It's that they get away with it. Most people actually believe them. And more than a few (I'm looking at you Naomi) live in a bizarro world were everything they do is for the market.

    AAAAARRRRGGGHHHH!!!

  17. SniffSniff   17 years ago

    DeMint is just another embarassment like Newt, soon you will see.

    Until yesterday Bernie Madoff was happy too. Some that a 'condition' as well.

  18. P Brooks   17 years ago

    The market has failed to provide me a buyer willing to pay what I want; Bail me out!

  19. Mike   17 years ago

    "What are normal economic conditions? Is there some magic number for growth, unemployment, inflation, etc., that qualifies as "normal?""

    Normal economic conditions are whatever the next president inherits.

  20. Citizen Nothing   17 years ago

    Market failure is an oxymoron.
    George W. is just a moron.

  21. P Brooks   17 years ago

    Bush for CarCzar!

  22. Citizen Nothing   17 years ago

    And where ARE all the Bush defenders who used to pop up here regularly?

  23. Episiarch   17 years ago

    CN, Bush is indefensible by even the stupidest partisan hacks at this point.

  24. Pain   17 years ago

    For the love of God someone get Bush a bigger pretzel!

  25. Doug   17 years ago

    The stupid son of a bitch did enough damage when he had something to lose. Now that he's a lame dick [sic] his potential for destruction is mind boggling.

  26. phalkor   17 years ago

    So practically, I have lost around 40% of my personal savings since june. Since I'm fucked anyway, is there a practical way for me to maximize my future security? Maybe I shouldn't quit my job...

  27. phalkor   17 years ago

    nevermind, the actions herein have little/no effect on me or my control over my monies.

  28. Jordan   17 years ago

    "Normal market conditions"

    As opposed to a government-created depression.

    Markets should determine everybody's fate. Interfering with the working of the Market is just unnatural.

    You do realize that the "Market" is not some monolithic entity, right? It's just the interactions of people. So yes, people should determine their own fates. I'm sorry the thought of individual liberty makes dumbasses like you wet their pants.

  29. cunnivore   17 years ago

    And where ARE all the Bush defenders who used to pop up here regularly?

    I think you're confusing "Bush defenders" with "Iraq war defenders". The latter includes TallDave, RC Dean, and the others, but they have been very critical of Bush on domestic spending policy.

    I don't really know of any regulars here who defend Bush's economic performance.

  30. cunnivore   17 years ago

    While Bush deserves every bit of criticism he gets, keep in mind he's not doing this singlehandedly. In fact, if he does divert funds from the TARP to bail out the automakers, he'll just be doing what Congressional Dems wanted him to do two weeks ago.

    As stupid and destructive as his actions have been, he could have done none of it without the D's being complicit.

  31. SIV   17 years ago

    robc,

    If it happens they won't be motivated by principles of liberty.It will be more like the Bonus March.

  32. Travis   17 years ago

    "Vice President Cheney had told senator Thursday that it could be "Herbert Hoover" time if the bailout failed, which it did several hours later."

    I've never wanted someone's pacemaker to fail until now.

  33. Reformed Republican   17 years ago

    Interfering with the working of the Market is just unnatural.

    Because we see how well all of the market interference of the past few decades has turned out.

  34. Citizen Nothing   17 years ago

    Exactly, SIV.
    If the revolution comes, I fear it won't be the kind most of us would welcome.

  35. Travis   17 years ago

    "If the revolution comes, I fear it won't be the kind most of us would welcome."

    Viva la Che!

  36. robc   17 years ago

    SIV,

    If it happens they won't be motivated by principles of liberty.It will be more like the Bonus March.

    So what? It still needs to be done.

  37. Egosumabbas   17 years ago

    "If the revolution comes, I fear it won't be the kind most of us would welcome."

    Guns, Gold, and MRE's my friend. Guns, Gold, and MRE's.

  38. robc   17 years ago

    Im not calling for revolution, Im calling for using the threat of violence to keep politicians in line. When was the last time a US Rep went home and was tarred and feathered getting off the plane?

  39. Citizen Nothing   17 years ago

    I still wonder about the "Gold" component of your equation, egosum.
    The value of gold, like federal reserve notes, is largely in the mind of the beholder.

  40. John Thacker   17 years ago

    Of course, as the WSJ notes, most economists say that the Detroit automakers can't be allowed to fail, and that government must save them somehow. Of course, like the financial bailout they all disagree about how to do it, and don't like any options, including those presented, but all agree that "something must be done."

    So I guess Bush is making the mistake of listening to the experts and the educated again, just like with the financial bailout, instead of small-town, uneducated populists like Joe the Plumber (who, gasp, like Mises and Palin, and hated McCain defending the financial bailout).

  41. robc   17 years ago

    Tennessee's 2000/2002 income tax protest was (mostly) peaceful. The fact that they basicly surrounded the state capital for the whole session isnt a revolution.

  42. SIV   17 years ago

    The value of gold, like federal reserve notes, is largely in the mind of the beholder.

    If decreased demand for jewelry and industrial metals causes the price of gold to collapse I'll buy some. If nothing else I can always cast it into useful items like fishing sinkers and bullets.

  43. Egosumabbas   17 years ago

    "Citizen Nothing | December 12, 2008, 11:50am | #

    I still wonder about the "Gold" component of your equation, egosum.
    The value of gold, like federal reserve notes, is largely in the mind of the beholder."

    You severely underestimate the appeal of shiny objects in dark economic times, my friend. It's like moths to a flame.

  44. Episiarch   17 years ago

    The value of gold, like federal reserve notes, is largely in the mind of the beholder

    Violence is the only true currency, my friends.

  45. Egosumabbas   17 years ago

    Just look at ghetto culture and the appeal of bling, or the appeal of gold in China and India. It's only in affluent times that people are satisfied with abstractions such as credit cards and fiat money.

  46. J sub D   17 years ago

    With this legislation, AMTRAK will be self-sufficient by 1992 1995 1998 ad infinitum.

    Are perennially unprofitable routes discontinued? Are the employees wages and benefits below the national average? Will legislators even allow the termination of loser routes in their district/state?

    No, no, and fuck no.

    Good luck closing a widget plant in the appropriations committee chairman's district.

  47. Egosumabbas   17 years ago

    I wonder if anybody else besides me made it a point to vacate any city larger than 500,000 people.

  48. P Brooks   17 years ago

    When was the last time a US Rep went home and was tarred and feathered getting off the plane?

    When was the last time one was called a "loathsome, thieving, cocksucker" to his face?

  49. Naga Sadow   17 years ago

    Egosumabbas,

    You're all right.

  50. Kolohe   17 years ago

    I've been hoarding all bottlecaps I can get my hands on.

  51. perilisk   17 years ago

    "I've been hoarding all bottlecaps I can get my hands on."

    They started using gold out west though.

  52. Jeffersonianideal   17 years ago

    Ponzie, Ponzier, Ponziest

    Mr. Madoff's $50 billion dollar investment fraud has been considered by business analysts to be one of the worst this country has seen. While Madoff's sinistrous plot is certainly monumental in terms of size and scope, there remains a government administered Ponzie type plan that Madoff could not imagine in his wildest dreams. In place since legislation made the New Deal plan law in 1935, Social Security has taken in over $10.7 trillion dollars since 1937 according to the Social Security Administration, making the wealth redistribution program the biggest Ponzie scheme ever.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Damned if You Do

Liz Wolfe | 5.6.2026 9:30 AM

Surveillance Tools Intended for Border Control Are Being Used Against Americans

J.D. Tuccille | 5.6.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Yes Bruh, No Bruh

Charles Oliver | 5.6.2026 4:00 AM

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks