Canada

Maher Arar May Get to Sue His Abducters

|

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has resurrected Maher Arar's lawsuit over the U.S. government's decision to ship him off to his native Syria, where he was imprisoned for a year and tortured. Arar, a Canadian telecommunications engineer, was mistakenly linked to Al Qaeda by the Canadian government, which shared this misinformation with U.S. officials, prompting them to detain Arar while he was switching planes at JFK in 2002. While the Canadian government has apologized to Arar and paid him $10 million in compenation, the most the U.S. government has been able to muster was Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's concession last year that the case was not "handled as it should have been." In June the 2nd Circuit dismissed Arar's lawsuit, which names former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI Director Robert Mueller, and former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge as defendants. Two judges on the three-judge panel concluded that U.S. courts did not have jurisdiction to hear the case because Arar had never officially entered the country. The third judge dismissed that premise as "a legal fiction," saying Arar "was, in effect, abducted while attempting to transit at J.F.K. Airport." The full court's decision to rehear the case is highly unusual, especially since no one asked it to do so, and suggests a majority may ultimately decide to let the case proceed.

I wrote about the Canadian government exoneration of Arar in a 2006 column.

NEXT: All the News That's Fit to Print vs. the World's Only Reliable News

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Two judges on the three-judge panel concluded that U.S. courts did not have jurisdiction to hear the case because Arar had never officially entered the country.”

    Presumably, that means if I smoke a joint in the jetway before I go through passport control, that means I can’t be prosecuted under US law then, right?

  2. He was fingered by his own government, Canada and tortured by his native Syria?

    I’m thinking the US is low on the list of countries that owe him an apology.

  3. Could it be that, after seven years of indolent thumb-sucking, the Judiciary might actually exercise their duty to provide Constitutional oversight?

    The mind reels.

  4. I’m thinking the US is low on the list of countries that owe him an apology.

    Except for the part where the United States Government snatched him at an airport on U S soil, and delivered him to the Syrians on a silver fucking platter, that might not be complete bullshit.

  5. The people who make apologies for the government’s action in this case disgust me almost as much as what happened to Arar.

    Is this still America?

  6. Bubba, I like the way you leave out America’s involvement to make you statement appear true.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.