The Care and Feeding of Soldiers: Any Larger Implications?
Tyler Cowen wonders whether we can leap to any conclusions about the economy writ large from the starting point of how well the Army takes care of Vets health care--or food.
Cowen's reason contributions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Saaaaaay that's a mighty spiffy man-hole cover there. I bet it's nice 'n cozy in that sewer.
Having received medical care in the Army, and as I am now getting medical care from the VA, I can assure you all that the Army and VA health care systems are both terrible, terrible, terrible.
The VA does give itself lots of awards, though. That must count for something.
So, Jake, having had direct experience with government-run healthcare systems, what are your thoughts on increasing the government control of our healthcare system?
So he figures (based on nothing) that army people eat better than the average American, and as far as he knows, their food isn't orders of magnitude more expensive than civilian food.
Is this now enough evidence to suggest the government should take over food distribution?