Republican Debate V: The Demolition Derby in Durham
The fifth Republican presidential debate starts at 9 p.m. ET, right when a rival event will be wrapping up. So I plan to liveblog it but I might get a late start.
The debate will appear on Fox News and feature eight Republican candidates, minus Fred Thompson, after negotiations to let him bring his sofa onto the stage collapsed at the 11th hour.
Consider this an open thread.
9:04: The panderpalooza begins! Every candidate is happier to be in New Hampshire than Los Angeles, like the dastardly Fred Dalton Thompson. Brit Hume smartly gives the first "bash Thompson" ticket to Mike Huckabee, who riffs like he was schooled by Yakov Smirnoff.
9:05: Ron Paul forgoes a joke: "Fred Thompson will dilute my opponents' votes, because he's pro-war and I'm the anti-war candidate!"
9:06: John McCain takes a whack at Thompson's age and laziness: "Maybe we're up past his bedtime!" Then he chucks that advantage into the garbage by quoting Mo Udall. "Remember, people—I'm old and I lose elections."
9:07: Mitt Romney's software malfunctions and he repeats the Thompson joke he told days ago: "What's the hurry? Get in in January." Polite laughter.
9:08: Giuliani doesn't repeat a joke, but he tells the one everyone's been prodding him to tell: "Fred's done a good job playing me on Law and Order."
9:09: Romney takes a barb about his own hiring of illegal workers and neatly repackages it as proof that amnesty doesn't work. So, what happened to his garden?
9:10: Time for Giuliani to defend his 1990s immigration squishiness. He gets, after a while, to the safe answer: "The city eventually got safer."
9:12: Nice one, Chris Wallace, nailing McCain on his newfound support for enforcement-only immigration law. "It's an emotional issue." True. "Why we failed is because the American people have lost confidence in us." Ah, that was the problem. If only Americans could become more confident in legislators?
9:14: Now that Mike Huckabee has momentum he's getting blasted by his old quotes instead of pitched softballs about evolution. Does he still think anti-immigration sentiment is racist? No, Americans are good people, but they want "secure borders." They want the government to have as good a handle on human traffic as Amazon.com has on book orders, which isn't dehumanizing at all. Witness the slow slide towards predictibility of Mike Huckabee!
9:16: Tancredo blows the immigration question, whining and yelling about how the rest of the candidates didn't come around to his position until they got humiliated. "It's about the rule of law!" He's getting nowhere with this: it's a circular argument.
9:18: It was funny the first time Duncan Hunter decried "scraggly little fences." Less so now.
9:19: We cut to a diner in New Hampshire where an immigration lawyer and her cop husband are being accosted by Fox News cameras. The cop says he's "overwhelmed" by illegals, so Cameron nicely edits what he's trying to say and asks "How do you not call [what Rudy supports] amnesty?"
9:20: Rudy dodges with another New York story and a plea for a "technological fence."
9:21: John McCain boldly comes out against forgiveness (the dictionary definition of "amnesty"). Come on, hasn't he been torn up enough on this issue? Isn't it basically dodo-dead in the Senate?
9:22: McCain finally finds a way to tie immigration to war: He's all for giving citizenship to brave soldiers.
9:23: "Close down the sanctuary cities," says Romney, who as we'll all remember sent Massachusetts state troopers to raze Cambridge when he was governor and it was--as now--a sanctuary city.
9:24: A Larry Craig question makes Brownback's eyes scrunch up to an even more uncomfrotable size. He comes out against Craig's un-resignation: "We shouldn't walk away from family values because instances like this happen in our party."
9:26: Duncan Hunter wants the scraggly little Larry Craig to resign and bashes Barney Frank. (Who else could he be referring to: A Democrat with "these problems" who became a committee chairman?) At least he's ending his political career with class, you know?
9:28: Romney wilts with a fluffy answer about abortion and "changing hearts and minds." Republican voters want you to give David Souter a blanket party and replace him with Ann Coulter, Mitt. They don't worry about the hearts and minds.
9:29: Mike Huckabee supports human beings. Take that, Ron Paul! His dog whistling abilities are excellent, though - among the humans he wants to protect are "people in long-term care facilities," meaning Terri Schiavo. Iowan voters know what he's talking about and they start to feel all tingly.
9:31: Rudy Giuliani has this great, fabricated belly laugh he unleashes whenever someone quotes Fred Thompson to him. He recites NYC crime numbers and says, sure, states can let college students carry guns to prevent Virginia Tech II.
9:32: Wendell Goler, who asked Ron Paul the 9/11 question last time, asks why he thinks armed passengers could have prevented 9/11 since "planes get diverted when people hear Arabic." Paul really nails this one. He challenges Goler's framing, pointing out that he said government bungling and rule-setting, overuling what airlines wanted, was the problem.
9:34: Brownback manages to blow a same-sex marriage question by admitting kids can be raised in single-parent households.
9:39: Goler likes to throw McCain's angry campaign trail quotes back at him, probably because he seems like a different person on this stage--quiet, sober. He amusingly takes/doesn't take credit for the surge. "I've advocated the same strategy, which some Democrats call the McCain strategy, which it is not."
9:41: Why is Rudy qualified to lead a nation at war with terrorists, given that he was just a mayor of New York? He reveals that, well, that's good enough--he mentions a bunch of non-terrorism related crises that he fixed, and you can sense the patriotic fibers in GOP voters' backs stiffening. "Hell yes, he cut the crime rate--he can calm down the Middle East!" Rudy says "I'm not running on September 11," which… come on, how can anyone snark about that? Oscar Wilde wouldn't have a bon mot for that.
9:43: "The surge has worked!" says Romney. "No, the surge is working!" says McCain. The debate that's tearing the GOP apart!
9:45: McCain wants "peace with honor," which is the way to calm down the Middle East, as Islamic terrorists are usually calmed right down by hubris.
9:46: Ron Paul just smacks aside the idea that any conventional wisdom about Iraq could be right.
9:47: Chris Wallace: "You're saying we should take our marching orders from al Qaeda?" Paul: "No, I'm saying we should take our marching orders from the Constitution!" The rest of the candidates are actually laughing during this. Paul missteps when he says the Iraq War was against "international law"--I don't think I need to explain why--and Rudy dives for another chance at the punching bag like he had the last time Fox hosted one of these debates. Surprisingly, the moderators go to the only man who could euthanize this right now: Sam "the human quaalude" Brownback.
9:49: Huckabee wants to stay in Iraq because when he picked things up at the general store he had to pay for them.
9:50: Notice how everyone is complimenting John McCain tonight? Notice how Romney is attacking Rudy and ignoring McCain? That's not a coincidence.
9:52: This is really good TV. Huckabee and Ron Paul go all Lincoln-Douglas on Iraq, Huckabee saying amazing things like "we are one nation--when we make a mistake, we make it together!" and Paul saying "we correct that mistake!" Huckabee's actually one of the least credible candidates to argue about honor and blood-n-guts warfare (he's famous for losing weight, not scrapping with Charlie). He gets applause for mouthing the party line, but Paul cleans his clock.
9:54: Duncan Hunterzzzzzzzz
9:56: Tancredo: "Wouldn't it be lovely if we could just leave Iraq?" Well, yes. But that would be a problem because we need to blow up some desert people.
9:57: Some more about Paul. He's making the kind of missteps that would destroy a frontrunning campaign - "international law," saying we made a mistake by going into "Afghanistan". But he's not getting tossed around or clowned the way he did in the first Fox debate. His loud "No!" when Chris Wallace accused him of siding with al Qaeda was the product of experience: Last time, he didn't say "no" when Goler accused him of saying we deserved 9/11.
9:59: A military dad is honestly, spittingly angry about Romney comparing his sons' work for his campaign with kids "serving their country" in the army. Romney absolutely fails to convey emotion when he apologizes. This guy is a good-looking Dukakis.
10:01: Romney wants to bug mosques because "the most important thing is keeping us alive."
10:02: Oh, come on--we're rehashing the Jack Bauer round of the last Fox debate? Tancredo, for the record, would use his presidential power to torture terrorists if they're making us unsafe. But for the "T" word, think "go to great lengths."
10:04: Hm. Why, of all people does John McCain think he needs to quote someone else to get some credibility on torture?
10:05: Giuliani has never heard of rendition.
10:06: President Duncan Hunter would detain Gitmo prisoners indefinitely. And he's tired of them getting honey-glazed chicken and gaining weight and having people pay attention to them. *sniff*
10:08: Is Brownback high? His question is about the Vice Presidency and he's rambling about how "this is a big international country" like he's in the running for Miss Teen South Carolina.
10:10: Hah. McCain tries to twist a question about his not signing the "no tax hike" pledge into a bold pledge to "veto any pork barrel bill that comes across my desk." He was pretty obviously against supply-side taxes for a while, but the people who care about this issue aren't worried about McCain winning anymore.
10:13: Giuliani: "You take one pledge: To upload the Constitution of the United States." Yes, fine, we know he's mostly running on 9/11, but give him some credit for not taking a position on anything he's been asked to do since 9/11. It all comes back to what he did in NYC, which works with Republican voters, lucky enough.
10:15: Romney, by contrast, makes offhand references to what he did in Massachusetts and then promises the moon. He manages to make a lame John Edwards joke, but lame John Edwards jokes in this crowd are like gerbils thrown in a tank of pirhanas.
10:18: Huckabee claims the Fair Tax would hit prostitution, too. I'm not sure how that works. Do prostitutes add the local sales tax to their fees?
10:19: I'm sorry, could the other candidates giggle a little louder at Ron Paul? Thanks.
10:20: Paul thinks we do need intelligence-gathering "but we need the people analyzing that to be intelligent." Knocks intelligence spending, knocks the department of Homeland Security. Perhaps sensing that he might not get another question, he pledges to restore our liberties. "Ha, ha!" says Rudy.
10:21: Hey, Rudy, how can you lead on family values since you sleep around and your kids hate you. Rudy: Ignore my private life and look at my public works. Hate the sinner, love the sins. "My problems aren't that different from some people in this country… I'm not running as the perfect candidate, I'm running as a human being."
10:26: Damn, this is the hypothetical question? I was hoping for "One of Rudy Giuliani's wives and Larry Craig walk into a bar…"
10:28: Brit Hume goes for the easy laffs--or so he thinks!--by pitching an Iran doomsday scenario to Ron Paul. Paul just refuses to play ball. "Instead of talking about this, we should be asking what we can do now, in terms of talking to people, like the Russians and the Chinese--we don't need to go to war as our first resort." Hume is a little sour-loking at the answer and the applause it gets, but c'mon, he asked the question.
10:30: Duncan Hunter doesn't want to answer a hypothetical question, but he can't turn down a chance to be simultaneously boring and horrifying. It's sort of reassuring that the closest he'll get to the Football is in the Smithsonian. (This is true of Ron Paul, too, but still…)
10:33: After all that laughing, Giuliani actually addresses Paul a little: "I don't think you can look at this like the Cold War." And then he says that Reagan won the Cold War without firing a shot while pointing "like, a thousand missiles" at the USSR. Yes, no lessons for our Iran crises in that.
10:35: Romney wants to talk to everybody but our enemies need to "see our hands" and "know we mean business."
10:37: McCain points out that the hostages were freed "after Reagan raised his hand, by coincidence," wink wink. So all of the tough Iran talk is bunk, and we're going to give them weapons to calm them down.
It's a wrap, but Fox is going to its focus group. Half of them like McCain and think he won, but no one thinks the field came off well. None of the focus group seem to figure out that McCain is getting compliments from the rest of the candidates because he's stopped being a threat.
Giuliani, rapping with Hannity and Colmes, suggests a Gravel-Paul debate. I'm in if it's moderated by John Cox.
I'll do winners and losers again.
WINNERS
Fred Thompson. Yes, he looks like a sad-sack gimp for not competing, but he delayed his inevitable, stumbling debate disappointment for a couple weeks. The dream lives on!
Mike Huckabee. He actually sounded as lightweight as he ever has, but possibly because he's not polling so well in this state, nobody attacked him. He lost the exchange with Paul on points, but he's got the position on Iraq that most Republicans actually do.
LOSERS
Mitt Romney. I got a Dead Zone flash of an election night 2008, as the cable news maps go all blue and pundits are analyzing how nominee Romney blew the presidential debates when he was asked what he'd do if his son was killed by terrorists: "Golly! That wouldn't be nice." For all of his experience--the stuff he acknowledges, the stuff he runs away from--he's absolutely unable to show emotion. Maybe it's irrational for voters to care about that, but they will.
Rudy Giuliani. He managed to sound pre-programmed and unsure of himself. Fairly straightforward questions got answered with fragments of stump speeches.
Sam Brownback. Get out while you can still command good speaking fees. And while groups would still hire you to speak.
John McCain. I realize the focus groups think he won, but he sounded like a man on a farewell tour. Again, why would a man whose biography begins with "I was tortured for five years" need to quote a forgotten Reaganite on the reasons against torture? Why so many references to politicians who are long dead or retired?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm waiting for Mitt Romney's hair helmet to catch fire under hot stage lights.
Please keep a running count of each time the word "blowback" is uttered.
...if they talk about Senator "in the John" Craig, "blowback" will take on an entirely different meaning!
Please keep a running count of each time the word "blowback" is uttered.
Dunno. I think they'll steer clear of the whole Craig thing as best they can.
DAMN YOU MOOSE!
I wonder which candidate will tell he travels on private planes, and never stops by public restrooms on airports.
Open thread? I like pie!
Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, and Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas don't believe in evolution. Can we remove them from future debates? Either they are woefully ignorant of science or they are pandering to the least educated voters in the party. Either way they lost my vote.
Good one, VM! ROTFL...or however you say, "That was really funny"
Either they are woefully ignorant of science or they are pandering to the least educated voters in the party. Either way they lost my vote.
Anyone who is educated enough to hold high political office should have a basic enough understanding of biology to accept evolution. So, I'd go with pandering to the most ignorant voters in their party. Its the GOP version of John Edwards and the like telling union workers they will magically reverse globalization and start opening textile mills in America again. They don't believe it, but they think their base is dumb enough to.
Cesar, you're probably right. You're a cynical bastard, but you're probably right.
I think I'd respect Huckabee et al more if I thought they were just cynical manipulators. I'm pretty sure they're ridiculously ignorant, but very skilled at manipulation anyway...which is really a two-fer of douche.
They don't believe it, but they think their base is dumb enough to.
Yeah, but too often those types govern the way they talk -- even the ones being pandered to know that what you do matters more than what you say.
"Open thread? I like pie!"
Pie? Fuck you Tacos mmm, you socialist, statist monster....
Sorry, that's just how most of the debates here seem to go...
Here's a fun question for Ruuuuudy.
Don't expect Fox - or anyone else in the MSM - to ask about that.
If RonPaul supporters want to improve his chances, one very effective way would be to reduce the popularity of the top candidates. And, going to Ruuuudy's appearances and asking him that question would be a very effective way to do that.
Who wants to bet that Thompson will advertise during the debate?
OK, I just googled that and apparently, he will be running an ad during the debate he is skipping.
Um....does anybody still wanna bet?
I hate Fred Thompson already.
I'd like to see a link supporting the claim that Huckabee denies evolution. When I heard him speak, he said he thought evolution might be true but if so it was guided by God. This is where most intelligent deists wind up on the issue.
By the way, one can be educated and not believe in evolution. I'm a scientist and I certainly do believe in it, but questions can be raised by skeptics that rise above the elementary scientific education of someone who majored in, say, political science. For non-scientists to remain agnostic on the matter is reasonable and doesn't reflect negatively on their intellect.
http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=25626
At your service,
J sub D
Nathan, do you feel the same way about relativity, continental drift, the heliocentric solar system? These are basics. As the saying goes, "It ain't rocket science."
Nathan-
I am by no means a scientist, my major was history. But Bio 101 was enough to convince me of the truth of evolution, and I'd like to think any reasonable person would leave a basic biology class with the same impression.
Evolution being "guided" by God doesn't fall under deism. Deism holds that God created the universe, ie the conditions on earth under which life could develop, but stayed laissez-faire afterward. It makes sense only until you wonder why an all-powerful God would be content with sitting on his ass for the rest of eternity.
(I for one don't believe in any of it).
"By the way, one can be educated and not believe in evolution. I'm a scientist and I certainly do believe in it, but questions can be raised by skeptics that rise above the elementary scientific education of someone who majored in, say, political science. For non-scientists to remain agnostic on the matter is reasonable and doesn't reflect negatively on their intellect."
Nathan
Are you saying that due to the elementary nature of their science education they may be prone to arguments against evolution? I see your point, but if that is the case with these political scientists (I like that example cuz I know one who denies evolution) then shouldn't they realize that they are talking about something they know very little about, while the experts on the subject are enthusiastically telling them they are wrong and crazy? I have very little medical training, but if I went into the doctors office and he told me "hey, white blood cells fight disease" and then I went home and some preacher told me "you know, that white blood cell fighting disease stuff is a secularist myth. They really are quite bad for you, they turn into cancer you know" then I think I'd be a darn fool, knowing my ignorance on the subject, to say "you know, you're right, that doctor is pushing bunk!" A little humility from these lawyers and political scientists on issues that they know very little about would be nice.
A white collar co-worker and I were discussing the Lucy exhibit in Houston yesterday. He said "it's more of a leap of faith to buy (the fossils and conclusions on exhibit) than the Bible!". There are well educated people committed to their ignorant beliefs out there.
We are species prone to mysticism.
One other thing, I've read the entire bible AND The Origin of Species. I wonder what % of Intelligent Design/Creationism supporters have done either, much less both. Oh, I'm not a scientist, just a technician/tech writer (and a genuine skeptic).
I don't believe in evolution either.
I believe evolution occurred, but I don't believe IN it, which is a different thing. Sort of like believing God exists isn't the same as believing in God. In Christian theology, the devil believes God exists, but one could hardly say he believes IN God.
Vain dispute over words? Probably, but those are awfully touchy words for a religious person, so I can understand why they'd want to distance themselves from talk of believing in anything other than God.
I believe evolution occurred, but I don't believe IN it, which is a different thing. Sort of like believing God exists isn't the same as believing in God. In Christian theology, the devil believes God exists, but one could hardly say he believes IN God.
Vain dispute over words? Probably, but those are awfully touchy words for a religious person, so I can understand why they'd want to distance themselves from talk of believing in anything other than God.
Crimethink, I thank you for making the difference. Believing in evolution makes into some kind of question of faith, which scientific theories are not.
When I heard him speak, he said he thought evolution might be true but if so it was guided by God. This is where most intelligent deists wind up on the issue.
You don't mean "deists." You mean either "theists" or "creationists."
I can't believe the Ron Paul video on Slate's home page today didn't get an open thread. Its incredible.
Its near the right of the page, scroll down just a tad. http://www.slate.com
Didn't get its own thread. This is an open thread.
Nathan may have been referring to Huckabee's recent appearance on Bill Maher's cable show. Maher, who is aggressively atheistic, pounded Huckabee on the evolution issue and Huckabee responded by moving as close as he could to a position Maher's audience could stomach, i.e. he said he didn't know exactly how God did it, maybe over hundreds of millions of years, but he believed God was at work. If he had been speaking to an audience of fundamentalist Christians, he would probably have just said God created the world, Hallelujah, and left it at that.
Well I flipped the TeeVee over to Fox News as I want my debate coverage fair and balanced- none of that liberal commie MSM shit, thank you- and O' Reilly is just about over and I thought....
DAMN! I'd really like to "pour the pork" to Mary Katherine Ham! What a fuckin' BABE!
Crimethink...well said...having said that, I find it hard to beleive that any of the three Republican anti-evolutionists are in any way taking as nuanced a view as you have laid out.
Ron Paul Ron Paul Ron Paul !!!!!
I'm watching on the foxnews.com website with "PeopleMeter" showing the reaction of moderates and conservatives. It's nice seeing all the candidates behind bars (of the graph)
Grand Chalupa,
I was more shocked to find myself seeing that hysterical moron Morton Downey Jr. after all these years as I was to see a much younger Ron Paul.
It was a good video.
So, what happened to his garden?
See, he could have worked a great Voltaire joke in there, but he played it too lowbrow.
RON PAUL FTW OMG!!
Now that I got that out of the way, can anyone explain why the Fox News live feed isnt loading for me?
God, Huckabee just related tracking fedex packages to illegal immigrants! FedEx is his solution to sealing the borders. Nice.
Too bad I'm at work and can't watch the debate. Oh, well, at least I can get on the Internet and comment on H&R.
I found out why. They aren't compatible with Firefox. Fox news would require internet explorer!
gaijin,
I was wondering the same thing. It's a little easier to track something that's handed to you and never leaves your possession than someone who's trying not to be tracked...
Yep, 6 months to build that fence. No Problem!!
and now Ruuudy thinks an id card is the answer...but only for the immigrants, of course.
You want a question, Brownback?! I'LL GIVE YOU A GODDAM QUESTION! What do you think of Larry Craig?
So the only question RP is going to get is being asked about Fred Thompson. Super.
Duncan Hunter: When people do things like Craig/etc. we force them out, unlike the Dems.
...Vitter?
I'm fine with RP not getting the immigration question. It's too much like rest of them.
His answer would be too much like the rest of them, I should say.
"Mr. Paul, you beleive travellers should be able to carry guns on a plane...guns on a plane!"
Interviewer = dumbass
Ron Paul!!!!!!!!
Arm the passengers!!!!!!!!!!!
Romney takes a barb about his own hiring of illegal workers
That's a false statement. He contracted with someone who hired people who allegedly were here illegally. The contractors claims they told him they were here legally.
sorry, 'moderator - dumbass'
Paul got a nice round of applause for his answer pointing out the results of relying on the governbment to protect us on a plane.
Enough is enough! I have HAD it with these mothafucking guns on this mothafucking plane! Everybody strap in! I'm about to open some fucking windows.
Paul got asked kind of a weird question. I also think airlines shouldn't be entirely responsible because they are moving vehicles that can do things like fly into large buildings.
Why are so many LEO's skinheads?
"His dog whistling abilities are excellent, though - among the humans he wants to protect are "people in long-term care facilities," meaning Terri Schiavo. Iowan voters know what he's talking about and they start to feel all tingly."
I think that the Schiavo thing back-fired on the Republicans though . . .
Aww! Mayor Giulianni has a crush!
Rudy: "I'm not running on what I did on September 11"
bwwwwwaaaaahhhhhaaaaaahhhhaaaaa!!!!!!!
Stop it Rudy you're killing me!!!!
......and the streets of NY were paved with gold when Rudy left office.
"9:31: Rudy Giuliani has this great, fabricated belly laugh he unleashes whenever someone quotes Fred Thompson to him. He recites NYC crime numbers and says, sure, states can let college students carry guns to prevent Virginia Tech II."
Oh, just like he did in NYC . . . .
The surge is working! We know it because the guys whose job it is to implement it have told us so!
McCain: Surge is working and we have to rally the American people!
When Eric Dondero (Dunderhead) shows up, we will know this thread has jumped the shark.
My Refresh button is getting a workout!!
RRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
PPPPPPPPPPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLLL
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Wallace is a schmuck.
"Congressman Paul, are you saying we should take our marching orders from al-Qaeda?"
--"No! I think we should take our marching orders from the Constitution!"
(massive boos from the crowd -- they're booing the constitution?!)
Wow. Chris Wallace is a bigger ass than his dad.
(massive boos from the crowd -- they're booing the constitution?!)
Given the state of todays Republican Party? I wouldn't be surprised.
Huckabee on why we need to stay in Iraq forever: "When we make a mistake, we make it as one country, we can't be the Divided States of America!"
Paul: "How much more do we have to do to save face -- that's all we're doing!"
Huckabee on Iraq: We broke it, we bought it. We broke Iraq we gotta fix it.
Ron Paul!!!!!!!!!!!!! His best performance EVER!!!!! Ate Huckabee alive. Paul is on FIRE!!!
Chris Wallace of Fox News = much bigger ass than his dad.
Awesome exchange with Ron Paul
Nice little side debate there with Huckabee and Paul. I was worried for Paul, but think he pulled it off well.
Romney sounds like someone who does Football play by play (or some kind of sports announcing, I can't place it)or something.
Romney pwned by the guy in the diner!
"Sir, I am offended by your comparing the 'sacrifice' of your son working for your campaing to my son's sacrifice in Iraq."
Romney sounds like someone who does Football play by play (or some kind of sports announcing, I can't place it)or something.
"Like watching a duck make love to a football..."
I figured the fux news stooges would find somebody in the diner to heckle Paul. It was nice to see the guy gave Romney a hard time.
Republican voters want you to give David Souter a blanket party and replace him with Ann Coulter.
Well it would be an improvement.....sounds good to me.
Weigel,
They haven't had quaaludes since before you were born. You might as well be calling Brownback a Mickey Finn.
9:59: A military dad is honestly, spittingly angry about Romney comparing his sons' work for his campaign with kids "serving their country" in the army. Romney absolutely fails to convey emotion when he apologizes. This guy is a good-looking Dukakis.
This event will give Romney serious, serious trouble in the days ahead. You heard it here first!
Romney wants to plant bugs in US mosques. "People talk about civil rights, but the most important civil right is the right to be kept alive."
Go fuck yourself, sir.
RP is being setup by Fox. The way he "sounds" has harmed him.
Tancredo: "I will assf**k your grandma to keep America safe. If that's what it takes."
Romney:
"People talk about civil rights, but the most important civil right is the right to be kept alive."
Government can not by itself "save the right to be kept alive." The second amendment does.
iih- That was the Romney amendment.
The loudest noise comes from RP's supporters without doubt.
What is their definition of Victory? I was talking to Prince before the war and I stated that if we dethroned the God of Abraham and educated the people in the ways of peace codified by Ayn Rand then we might be victorious. But how can people who worship the same capricious God bring peace to another country? We have more people incarcerated than any other. Incarnation seems to be the standard that they use as the milestone for victory. Until we have objective standards we will not win.
JLM:
Never have I believed in the 2nd amendment as I do now after hearing Tancredo and Romney.
The GOP sucks!
Doesn't Guiliani's little laugh make him unelectable? That shit is annoying. As far as appearances go, Rudy irks me as much as anyone.
Rudy: "When has a country ever won a war when they were talking about when they were going to retreat?"
When you're winning a war, you don't talk about when you're going to retreat. Absolutely right. But I don't think it means what you think it means.
You can just leave Guantanoma Bay, and those prisoners become Cubans. Sound like a great solution, not Giuliani?
What is their definition of Victory?
"Victory" is defined as nice, rosy word that invokes happiness and cheerfulness. Oh, wait, marijuana does that too!
"Romney wants to plant bugs in US mosques."
I wonder how he would react to bugs being in Morman Churches???
Romney's Church has baptised the Prophet Mohammed. Or do they just baptise dead Americans?
""People talk about civil rights, but the most important civil right is the right to be kept alive."
There is a word for people who can conceive of no greater evil than their own death; we call them 'cowards'.
Brownback: "Complementarity?" Do you perhaps mean onemindednessivity?
Now it is time for small government tax codes... after a powerful big government foreign policy and expenditures. Are these people schizophrenic?
iih,
Hardly. Low taxes and big spending are completely consistent in that voters like both of them.
You will find that, in American politics, nothing is more schizophrenic than consistency.
Funny how when anyone but Paul mentions the Constitution there is a smattering of applause...when Paul mentions it there is a roar. Wonder what that means?...hmmm
Romney doesn't care about the blind people.
iih, it may have something to do with the Laffer Curve ... Maybe they think the government will get more dinero by lowering taxes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_Curve
But then, I am at work and not watching the debate. Just following it on H&R.
crimethink:
Oh, got it! 🙂
They are talking about taxes and not a single question is directed to the one person who will give a straight answer!?!? (i.e., RP).
"Republican voters want you to give David Souter a blanket party and replace him with Ann Coulter.
Well it would be an improvement.....sounds good to me."
Great to hear from the never eloquent and always poorly reasoned SIV again! So you're against reproductive rights, who would have guessed? The real question for you SIV is then: would you make dog and chicken fetuses fight?
Libertarian Librarian:
Hmmm, so I guess the US is on the right side of that curve.
HERE GOES RP!!!!
Wallace and Guiliani are the 2 biggest asses in the room.
Who is the idiot candidate who laughs whenever RP speaks. That idiot.
iih,
That's Juliannie.
Oh shit, Rudy took down the glasses and is getting serious.
How come no one is laughing at and taunting Rudy when he is asked why he has no "Family Values"?
This little Hyeena bitch is laughing at every Ron Paul stance.
crimethink:
That's Juliannie.
Such an idiot.
Giuliani is a complete fucktard. He makes me want to vote for Hillary.
Who is the idiot candidate who laughs whenever RP speaks. That idiot.
His name starts with a "G" and sounds like "fascist."
What Huckabee meant was that Prostitutes and Drug Dealers would be paying taxes under the Fair Tax
Of course, the funny thing is that some of RP's positions that Wallace and Giuliani were laughing at (eliminating depts, etc) were part of the Contract with America the Republicans took over Congress with in 1994.
13 years changes a lot of things, I guess.
Paul's answer wasn't so hot, but that was an awfully difficult question to answer in 30 seconds.
Cheers to Huckabee for his gracious comments about McCain's service. I don't like some things he's stood for, but the guy went through some shit for his country.
Jeers to his baiting of Paul on Iraq. He's got no clue how to get outta there...
Since Paul won't win anyway, he should just slug Rudy and then dropkick Chris Wallace.
Brit Hume: "When we come back, the candidates will respond to a scenario the next president may face."
Get your 24 flash cards ready, candidates!
Truly, there is no honor in politics. RP should have run as an LP candidate. Not much publicity in that case, but the cause won't be ridiculed the way it is now. But RP is doing relatively well (except the UN thing and the Afghanistan thing).
It was good Huckabee baited RP, in the same way it was good when Rudy did. It gave him a chance to actually say something.
And who wants to bet that Hannity's live poll results will be manipulated?
So, would David Vitter have to pay back taxes under Huckabee's proposal?
You have to give it to Paul...That man is the closest thing to a libertarian running for Prez outside the LP I've seen in a loooong time. He's not perfect, as some here have pointed out, but he talks the lib talk like he was a regular poster here. And he does it when it's hard too, where the answers may be unpopular...
Since Paul won't win anyway, he should just slug Rudy and then dropkick Chris Wallace.
He should just walk out.
Mentioning Iran and Israel I knew the question is going for RP. And G just laughed again. The idiot. The idiot. The idiot.
CHEEERS RP!
And you know the lame Iraq answers you hear tonight will be the ones pedaled after the Petraeus report by the GOP (goose)locksteppers...
1. Violence is down in Anbar (forget the rest of the nation, please)
2. There was no vacation for the lawmakers in Iraq.
3. We have to honor our troops (by getting more killed I guess)
The incomprehensible grunts you hear are the sound of Tancredo's straining not to say he'd bomb Mecca.
Paul just refuses to play ball. "Instead of talking about this, we should be asking what we can do now, in terms of talking to people, like the Russians and the Chinese--we don't need to go to war as our first resort."
Uh, Dave, he actually said we should be talking to the "Soviets"...I think he was drifting back and forth between now and the 60s...
Listening to these monkeys talk (except RP of course), I think -- given how RP is being perceived -- Obama in office is the better of all possibilities, even on a Hillary ticket -- I am sorry to say.
Let's look on the bright side. I've lived in fear of Hilary but as the lame cast of Repubs reveal that they are every bit as bad it really takes the pressure off...either way I'm screwed...so why worry!
Radical Islamic Jihad!!!! AAAIIYEEEE!
You know, after the Cold War people were saying the hard core conservatives would have to invent something as nefarious as the Communist for the sake of unity. We are seeing that creation...Bullshit says I.
todd b:
either way I'm screwed...so why worry!
But we'd probably be less screwed if Obama or Richardson is in office. Richardson won't make it, so Obama it is. The least "screwededness" of all possibilities (again, given how RP is being perceived).
Why is Brent Musberger involved in this debate?
...he actually said we should be talking to the "Soviets"
Hopefully, his campaign will spin this as tweaking of Putin's powerlust.
McCain: "People, be scared like hell, please! It is for your own good! (hehe, and may be mine, too)"
Romney: A military option in the hand is worth two on the table...
I will go throw up and will be back shortly.
Cannity and Holmes, doubt I can stomach this.
iih,
yeah, but the point is that as the "screwedness" differential decreases, I can just pretend that it doesn't exist and quit spending energy worrying about it...drinking more could help also...
Here comes Hannity! And another text poll!
So, any guess as to whether Paul breaks the 90% barrier?
Why do they keep equating the Iranian people with the Iranian government. As if the Iranian people like their government.
Well the text poll is obviously biased. Probably only Paul supporters use text messaging.
I think RP's hanging in there pretty well. Fox questioners are treating the Presidency like dictatorship and when all is said and done, I think RP is answering the questions pretty well. Thank goodness he's on the stage, otherwise these guys would be ripping off their shirts and pounding their chests...
PS. They must have a special mike attached to Guiliani to catch him laughing every time a question goes to the good doctor.
Romney wants to talk to everybody but our enemies need to "see our hands" and "know we mean business."
I agree!
Honestly, democracy sucks just listening to these monkeys (except RP) and those NH voters FOX is now interviewing. What happened to the "republic"? Funny -- it is called the "Republican" party.
The dinner party loves McCain and hates Giuliani.
It could be worse!
I think my tee vee has a delay or something......oh wait, I paused a while ago and have yet to catch up with everyone else...
"Then we take the military option off the table; and we hold the military option in our hand here"
Oh no! Mitt Romney is going to try to do the old 'military option' behind the ear trick to the Iranians!
Hannity's grilling Campaign Carl as to why he allowed that question for Romney from the guy in the diner.
Ok... some serious news. Red Sox lead over the Yankees just dropped to 6. Good news for G, bad for Mitt.
I am waiting to see if Rudy can manage to get out of his seat with Hannity's lips glued to his ass.
Stormy Dragon,
What's that behind your ear? It's...30,000 fully trained and rested Army soldiers!
Rudy's still going after Paul on Hannity. He said he should debate Mike Gravel.
Mitt Romney is going to try to do the old 'military option' behind the ear trick to the Iranians!
Hey Mahmood! Got your nose!
This is what this is all about. This interview is a must hear, and Charlie Savage's book is a must read:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14181701
At least Rudy learned from his last encounter with Paul that he's better off chuckling during the debate and then attacking him when he can't defend himself.
He's a fascist, but at least he's an adaptive fascist. One rung above Bush, at least.
Yeah, Paul and Gravel can debate if everyone else goes away.
The only thing worse than a smug, self-satisfied Mitt Romney is a smug, self-satisfied Mitt Romney lookalike.
"Hume is a little sour-looking..."
Any more than usual?
how the hell did Massachusetts pick this guy in the first place. Money I guess.
I'm all for having a solid libertarian in these debates, but face it, Paul is an assclown. He looks like a cross between Shaggy Doo and Barney Fife. What's with those creepy eyebrows, Jesus get a stylist before you go on TV.
and the Losers?
Cesar,
We are the losers, every time these asshats have a "debate".
(Except Ron Paul of course)
Yeah, I'm voting for the prettiest guy on the stage!
iih - I live in Belmont, which happens to be Romney's home town (and also the birth place of the John Birch Society oddly enough).
I'll answer your questin with my personal, poorly considered opinion. There are only a few types of people who can appeal to enough voters to win a state-wide election:
1) Your standard variety Mark 1 Mod 0 left wing democrat (Ted Kennedy)
2) An apolitical technocrat.
Romney presented himself as one of the latter.
Since the center of political power in Massachusetts is in the state house which is dominated by a coalition of left-wing democrats and machine politicians, there is less opposition to technocratic, "moderate Republican" politicians than one would expect.
Incidentally, having occasionally run into members of the Romney family, I am completely creeped out by them. To quote that great Iron Maiden lyric, I detect a hint of "the madman in his gaze".
RP got 35%!
Hannity is already whining over the poll.
It's telling that Dave can't come up with any winners besides a guy who managed not to get attacked by anyone except the Republican Emmanuel Goldstein.
And Hannity is going to "battle" RP.
The Sox have solid pitching, they'll be fine. Willard's pitches are as expensive as the Yanks and will ultimately fail too.
tarran:
Since the center of political power in Massachusetts is in the state house which is dominated by a coalition of left-wing democrats and machine politicians, there is less opposition to technocratic, "moderate Republican" politicians than one would expect.
I guess what you are saying is that this Mitt is different from that Mitt that MA elected.
Gotta love how Hannity keeps having to say "All the candidates...except for Rep. Paul...have basically the same positions on blah blah.."
The pricks at FoxNews cut off the video feed after Hannity was done with Romney. I'll have to wait till the inevitable Hannity-Paul blowback gets posted on YouTube tomorrow...
Vote for Ron Paul in the FOX poll !! Text 36288 - R6 for Ron Paul
Eric:
Are you commenting on my comment? They just lost to Toronto. NY won. Good omen for Rudy.
Here's a Ron Paul compilation from the debate:
link
WTF is wrong with these people?
"Clearly Principle won out in this exchange"
alluding to "principle" as "not losing our honor" rather than doing what is right. ( Huckabee vs. Paul exchange)
Um OK. Does FoxNews have its own bizarro world dictionary?
It's funny how Fox News won't show that bit from Ron Paul where he says Republicans are trying to save face instead of doing what is right wrt Iraq.
I know that Paul is polling around 3% still, but is Guliani actively trying to piss Paul supporters off? Does he think demeaning a fellow candidate with ad hominem is a good tactic? If so, this man is not fit to lead a three ring circus, let alone a country. For all Romney's robot likeness, he's a hell of lot more respectful of his competition and opposing American views than Mr. Guliani is.
Vote for Ron Paul in the FOX poll !! Text 36288 - R6 for Ron Paul
How does anyone think that any of those people on the stage (except Ron Paul in my opinion) could possibly win the Presidency?
Fox is slick...brought on the hack approval tracking guy to make some unqualified comments about Huckabee smacking down Paul...had to do something to counter the big Paul numbers in their text vote...
I think this was Ron Paul's best performance thus far. He is learning to play the game and make the opportunities he is given count as much as one could expect. GO Ron Paul GO.
They just accused RP supporters of rigging the text vote. Well lets do it. Lets hack the stupid thing.
Yes. If tomorrow pollsters found that 3/4ths of the electorate would be willing to support sacrificing human children in order to gain the favor of the Gods and thus victory in Iraq, I would expect that most of those guys would be tripping over each other in their zeal to present the plan for efficiently carrying out ritual killings of their fellow citizens.
They're not interviewing RP. Who is that idiot they are interviewing now. One of the monkeys (sorry real monkeys!)
Yes, I admit it, I counterfeitted thousands of simm cards with thousands of unique numbers so that I could spam their poll.
Why can't Fox admit that Paul supporters are actively, technically savvy and in large enough numbers to vote in a text poll. Its really nothing to admit, since its nothing new. There's no reason to hack it, since we're the only ones voting. That speaks more to an apathetic electorate compared to the zeal Paul brings out.
H&C are desperate for non-RP voters to text their votes. It is also probable the dems are voting for RP, too, just to make the other GOP look like real monkeys.
RP!!!!!!!!!! FINALLY!!!!!!!!!
How about this argument: Paul is the only candidate that presents a different viewpoint. All of the others are a variation on a theme. Thus Paul gets ALL of the vote against the status quo and those in favor get spread out over the rest. The Paul numbers aren't that surprising in that interpretation.
"You have your history all screwed up." -- RP
When are the next FEC fundraising results going to be announced? Two weeks? I think it is time for Hunter and Tancredo to go.
Sean Hannity is "educating" Ron Paul. Didn't Hannity drop-out to paint houses?
Ron Paul on now, H&C, Awesome!
The main candidates really just want to put their hands over their ears and go "la la la la can't hear you la la la la" to the people that support Ron Paul. They can't admit that America in general is not the republican voters they call.
Democrats in the WH in '08 and I really don't relish the consequences that could occur.
Typical Hannity...bring up Reagan/Soviets as an analogy and then when the obvious is pointed out...we never went to war against them but defeated them anyway...he backtracks and says "but the circumstances are entirely different"...huh?...then why did you bring it up Hannity?
Ron Paul did well in the face of being asked the most hostile questions Fox could muster: "So you're going to take AQ's marching orders in Iraq?"
Vote for Ron Paul in the FOX poll !! Text 36288 - R6 for Ron Paul
Hannity is burning on the inside.
Ron Paul pwns the poll!
The first Iraq question came 4o minutes into the debate. First question? Immigration. Those GOPers and Fox were probably hoping to getting away with the debate without discussing Iraq.
Is anyone else wondering what Huckabee was thinking when he responded to Paul's saying that our representatives have to correct past mistakes rather than continue them by saying, "that's what we do on the floor of the Senate"?
Neither of them is in the Senate, and even if they were it came across as a total non sequitur. I guess Huckabee can't handle more than three exchanges in a row without flash cards (which is admittedly three more than Giuliani can).
They haven't had quaaludes since before you were born.
really? no more quaaludes? then how do losers get laid these days?
Ron Paul wins-Yes!! A victory for liberty! Way to go, everyone! Now lets give his campaign some more money:
https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/
edna:
Still open for dinner? Haven't seen you on H&R for a while.
crimethink,
A bigger non sequitur was when Huckabee said something like "my mom told me not to break anything that you can't afford". What could that possibly mean aside from "we shouldn't have started the war because it isn't winnable"?
To be fair to the English (French?) language, what Huckabee said was more of a faux-pas.
I thought that the Republicans were supposed to be the party that understood economics?
Sunk costs are sunk costs.
Sunk costs are sunk costs.
Sunk costs are sunk costs.
I know that Paul is polling around 3% still, but is Guliani actively trying to piss Paul supporters off?
Either he doesn't care or he doesn't think he has any chance of getting them anyway. As I've said before, unfortunately brainless machismo is what seems to win the hearts and minds of GOPers these days, and laughing at someone else is one way of showing such. He's trying to position himself well for the upcoming alpha male showdown with Fred.
BTW, if you listen closely immediately after Chris Wallace's "marching orders from al-Qaeda" question, you can hear Romney chuckling as well. Monkey see, monkey do...
Speaking of the Soviets, the whole Giuliani laughtrack thing reminds of an article I read somewhere recently about how one of the things they do at the Kremlin when protestors camp out and make speeches against Putin's 'democracy,' is play a mocking laughing track over the loudspeakers as a kind of psyops thing. That is, before the secret police get there and beat the crap out of the demonstrators and haul them off.
In the tightly controlled and managed affairs that are political 'campaigns', I wouldn't be surprised if Juliani's antics was a deliberate tactic employed for similar effect.
Brownback: "We shouldn't walk away from family values because instances like this happen in our party."
Why Brownback? How much cock do you like to suck when you're not publicly thumping on a Bible and pissing on homosexuals?
But seriously...
That's right Sam, let's not join the rest of civilized humanity who have come to grips with things like sexual freedom for consenting adults, modern science, and secular governance. Let America wallow in a Medieval view of the world so you and your party can squeeze a few more votes out of the bigoted, willfully ignorant rubes who populate this hypocritical shit-hole of a nation. Let's not grant people--yes, gays and lesbians are people, Sam--the same rights as others because you embrace a Leave It To Beaver image of Americana that never was. Let's continue to
No Sam, we shouldn't walk away from your supersticious, domineering "family values" because Larry Craig or Ted Haggard can't practice what they stupidly preach on behalf of the GOP and conservatism. We should walk away from them because this is the 21st century, not the 12th. We have learned so much more about ourselves and the world around us in the last 100 years alone that disproves your nasty, backward vision of humanity. It's high time we put that knowledge for the good of all the world rather than pretending that such understanding is somehow "immoral" because they run counter to ancient writings that were allegedly inspired by some imaginary ruler of the universe.
It's not that we should walk away Brownback. It's that we must walk--no, run--away.
Edit: Take out that last "Let's continue to..." at the end of the third paragraph.
I was on a roll, got distracted, and went on with the next thought without completing the last.
Still, that was pretty good. I'm going to have to blog that one. All I need is a blog.
Edit: ...put that knowledge to use for...
But that would be a problem because we need to blow up some desert people.
Shouldn't that be "blow up some brown people"? i.e. If we weren't doing so in Iraq, we'd probably be back do doing so in Central America, or if some repugs have their way, Mexico.
David Weigel, how could you not say that Ron Paul singlehandedly won the debate??? Did you see the text poll, where people watching could only vote once (NOT re-dialing by the second as Hannity said). Reason has been very tentative of their support of Ron Paul. I like your magazine and everything, but y'all need to join the r{EVOL}ution the way lewrockwell.com did!
I like pork.
Only a bunch of potheads like you people on Reason could think that Ron Paul won this debate.
He sounded like an idiot
Why so many references to politicians who are long dead or retired?
Because Republicans would really, really like to forget the past decade or so.
geez, what's with the 'Juliani' stuff?
Somebody tell Sam Brownback that he's not in Kansas anymore.
What was the final tally on that text poll that Fox had? I'm assuming RP won because the results don't seem to be obviously posted on their site anywhere.
McCain is six years older than Thompson. He's the last one I'd expect to make an issue of age.
Only a bunch of potheads like you people on Reason could think that Ron Paul won this debate.
Hey, everybody, JoJo The Cuntface Boy is back! Where have you been JoJo? We sure have missed your keen insights! Wow, cutting barbs like "potheads!" You sure put us in our place, JoJo. I hope you and your Cuntface don't stay away so long next time!
Only a bunch of potheads like you people on Reason could think that Ron Paul won this debate.
The FOX debate poll was won by the most fiscally conservative, most pro-free enterprise, most non-interventionist candidate; Ron Paul! The founders of our republic would be pleased.
https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/
Which doofus put the wrong caption on the photo at the Fox news debate transcript page? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295886,00.html
iih, you must have missed rick barton, cesar, and me going at it a few posts down.
if someone else is payin', i'm eatin'. no roofies, though.
edna:
a few posts down
a few posts down... Hmmm.... nothing "down" there... may be you mean older threads?
Was that some sort of discussion on another thread, may be? Yeah... I'd like to see that.
if someone else is payin', i'm eatin'. no roofies, though.
🙂 Sorry but... There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free dinner. 😉
"Which doofus put the wrong caption on the photo at the Fox news debate transcript page?"
Giuliani, McCain, Romney, Dopey, Sneezy....It's all the same man.
"Fair and balanced" Fox is showing that they can be just as biased (in their own way) as the other networks.
If it's between Obama and Guiliani, the way Guiliani acted last night, I'm tempted to support Obama, but never Hillary.
Debate winner.
Fred T.
He had 6 million viewers while fielding questions from Jay Leno (who asked more intelligent questions,omg, than the Fox News guys).
Fox news debate will get half that at best.
Ron Paul did better than ever, but still came off as a goofball crank. Until he can get rid of the whine in his voice when he speaks, he will remain an outsider candidate.
"Listen to meeeee. I am the ooooonlyyyy one that knowwwwws."
Even when he is right on an issue, that tension in his voice ruins his point.
Bill Richardson suffers from the same problem.
It doesn't matter if you have the right message if you can't convey it successfully.
As long as the government remains divided between the Democratic idiots and the Republican idiots, we're probably ok. Since it's quite likely that the Democratic idiots will retain Congress, I will probably vote for whichever asshat gets the GOP nomination. Of course, if Ron Paul were to get the nomination, I would actually be voting for a non-asshat...
Why does Fox hate Rp so much? he gets like 3 questions, then in the interview all hannity tries to do is ear rape him. ANd come on the abolishing question is getting a little old. they never want to find out why he wants them abolished, just that he wants them abolished "But what about the EDUCATION!?!? or the CIA!? You must hate america and love terrorist"
it was almost sickening the zeal in which fox was dedicated to slamming him.
It must burn Fox News' britches that one thrid of their audience is for RP.
They can't just completely ignore him, no matter how much statists like Hannity and O'Reilly would like to. They have to include him, then try to smear him, which I think only makes him miore popular to the disaffected folks who actually watch Fox News.
If you're a good old boy in Alabama, would you want to drink beer with Ghouliani? Maybe with McCain, but certainly with Dr. Paul. You might not agree with him, but he says what he means and seems like a decent old codger.
"It doesn't matter if you have the right message if you can't convey it successfully."
Neu Mejican is right. I wish Ron Paul had the charm and charisma of Obama or Romney.
iih,
edna was referring to this thread:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/122265.html
Rick:
Thanks. Yeah... I was on the road that day enjoying a nice long drive through the beautiful Northeastern landscape.
Rich, edna,
That was one hell of an interesting discussion that I missed. Some good stuff to mull over there. Thanks again.
"Only a bunch of potheads like you people on Reason could think that Ron Paul won this debate.
He sounded like an idiot."
JohnD;
That's the way to tell those dirty Ron Paul Supporters, by disparaging then rather than intelligently debating the great points Dr. Ron Paul made.
"...one of the things they do at the Kremlin when protestors camp out and make speeches against Putin's 'democracy,' is play a mocking laughing track over the loudspeakers as a kind of psyops thing.",
Sounds to me like you are nothing more than a distracting laugh track. Too bad, it didn't work.
I figured out why it was that Guiliani was laughing. If this video is any indication it is a "tell" that means "I'm about to start lying".
iih,
You're quite welcome, for sure.
I figured out why it was that Guiliani was laughing. If this video is any indication it is a "tell" that means "I'm about to start lying".
I think you are right, mk. The false little laugh is also a stalling tactic to give him time to think of a lie.