Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Karl Seamon

Donate

Policy

The Deacons of Defense

Radley Balko | 2.9.2007 10:43 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Former Ohio gubernatorial candidate Ken Blackwell has an interesting column at Town Hall on how armed blacks beat back state segregators, the Klan, and similar antagonists in the Jim Crow south.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: America's No. 1 Endangered Species

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

PolicyGuns
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (17)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Larry A   19 years ago

    I wonder, did he see the movie?

  2. The Wine Commonsewer   19 years ago

    Great story, thanks Radley.

    here's another one

    The Klan and their police support were no match for the local NRA members.

    ....it was the last time the police openly joined in an armed attack on a Black home in Monroe......

  3. joe   19 years ago

    I see pieces about racist gun control in the ante-bellum and Jim Crowe south all the time at Reason, and other libertarians sources. It's a very compelling bit of history, that certainly produces its intended effect on me.

    Yet I can't recall ever hearing about this sorry episode in American history before I started reading Reason Online, and I've been arguing politics for a long time.

    It makes one wonder why the NRA itself, and pro-gun conservative politicians, are so reticent to use this weapon - doubly so, because they like to push the meme that gun control activists are motivated by prejudice, and this would be a perfect example.

    Any thoughts on why this might be?

  4. hunter   19 years ago

    Joe,
    It may have to do with the fact the black panthers worked this very meme quite explicitly and given the panther's history the NRA has good reason to be a bit leery of using this argument. For the same reason, you rarely see NRA spokesmen saying much about the political value of having an armed populace pointing guns at its leaders heads. The NRA doesn't think its good PR to be associated with armed revolt, even if several of the founders were quite explicit about its value and relevance to the 2nd amendment.
    An alternate or perhaps complementary hypothesis could be that a substantial number of NRA members are racist. Most I've known aren't, but some certainly were.

  5. shecky   19 years ago

    Armed blacks in the time of segregation may have been one of the ideas to popularize the whole notion of gun control.

  6. JohnJacksonIII   19 years ago

    The first time I recall reading about gun control as a racist idea was something written by G. Gordon Liddy.

  7. joe   19 years ago

    hunter,

    I hadn't thought of the Panthers angle.

    shecky,

    Doubtful. Gun control as a political movement was a creature of the post-civil rights era, with many of its leading advocates having had their formative political experiences during that fight.

  8. shecky   19 years ago

    Possible. I was thinking of the Mulford Act.

  9. de stijl   19 years ago

    joe & shecky,

    The name escapes me. Who was the California Governor who signed the Mulford Act again? I think his name starts with an R.

  10. hunter   19 years ago

    Joe,
    When did the modern gun control movement get underway? There certainly were laws to disarm blacks in the jim crow era, but I tend to agree with your assertion that modern gun control proponents don't have much connection with proponents of jim crow.

  11. joe   19 years ago

    hunter,

    It's generally said to have begun after the assination of Robert Kennedy.

  12. matt   19 years ago

    Talib Kweli, in his woefully underappreciated rap song Sharpshooters had the following to say:

    "I'm one with my gun/ treat it like my own son/It protects me/ and makes sure the Jakes respect me."

  13. wayne   19 years ago

    "...and makes sure the Jakes respect me."

    What is a Jake?

  14. NRA-4-Ever, yo!   19 years ago

    "What is a Jake?"

    White, conservative gun enthusiasts?

  15. Aresen   19 years ago

    Best line in the article:

    "As legendary civil rights leader Roy Innis recently said to me, the Deacons forced the Klan to re-evaluate their actions and often change their undergarments."

    LOL

  16. Shem   19 years ago

    jakes=police

  17. Larry A   19 years ago

    When did the modern gun control movement get underway? There certainly were laws to disarm blacks in the jim crow era, but I tend to agree with your assertion that modern gun control proponents don't have much connection with proponents of jim crow.

    The Sullivan Act (http://www.gunlawnews.org/sullivan.html) was passed in 1911, and required licensing of handguns in New York City. Why was it passed?

    [The proposed gun control] measure would prove corrective and salutary in a city filled with immigrants and evil communications, floating from the shores of Italy and Austria-Hungary. New York police reports frequently testify to the fact that the Italian and other south Continental gentry here are acquainted with the pocket pistol, and while drunk or merrymaking will use it quite as handily as the stiletto, and with more deadly effect. It is hoped that this treacherous and distinctly outlandish mode of settling disputes may not spread to corrupt the native good manners of the community.

    The Sullivan law gives police the discretion to issue licenses to own or carry handguns, and the resulting list of licensees is ourageously discriminatory.

    The initial Federal legislation is usually said to be the Gun Control Act of 1968, (http://www.gunlawnews.org/gca-68.html) passed in part as a reaction to the JFK assassination. It:
    * Prohibited the interstate transfer of guns between non-FFLs.
    * Prohibited shipping guns through the U.S. mail.
    * Prohibited shipping ammunition through the U.S. mail. (later overturned)
    * Eestablished minimum ages for firearms purchasers.
    * Required that all firearms (domestic and imported) be affixed with a serial number.
    * Expanded the categories of prohibited persons.
    * Enacted prohibitions on the importation of firearms "with no sporting purpose."
    * Implemented the Form 4473 (yellow form) for purchases. (The 4473 is now white.)
    * Attempted to address "Saturday Night Specials" by prohibiting the importation of small handguns.
    * Established some sentencing guidelines for crimes involving firearms.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 319 donors, we've reached $83,070 of our $400,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

Support Reason To Keep Your Favorite Podcast Going. Every Dollar You Give Is Matched!!

Peter Suderman | 12.4.2025 8:00 AM

SCOTUS Tackles Illegal File Sharing, Internet Music Piracy, and Copyright Law

Damon Root | 12.4.2025 7:00 AM

The History of This Word Reflects the Rise of Anti-Immigrant Politics

Jay Stooksberry | From the January 2026 issue

Brickbat: Hanging Judge

Charles Oliver | 12.4.2025 4:00 AM

The Horseshoe of Doom: Populists Left and Right Say America Is Failing. The Facts Don't.

Veronique de Rugy | 12.4.2025 1:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks