Aiding and Betting
Online gambling crackdown.
If you like to gamble, you might want to go to 888.com, where you can play blackjack, poker, craps, slots, and roulette. If you prefer sports betting, try betonsports.com.
According to the U.S. Justice Department, publishing the previous paragraph may be a felony. Federal prosecutors say helping Americans find online casinos or sports betting operations could amount to "aiding and abetting" illegal gambling, a crime punishable by up to two years in prison.
Last year, Deputy Assistant Attorney General John G. Malcolm sent a letter to media trade groups warning that their members could be breaking the law by accepting ads for gambling sites. Meanwhile, Raymond W. Gruender, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, convened a grand jury in St. Louis that started issuing subpoenas to companies that do business with the online gambling industry.
This campaign of intimidation already has yielded results. Since last fall several media companies, including Infinity Broadcasting, Viacom Outdoor, Discovery Networks, and Clear Channel Communications, have stopped running ads for online casinos and betting services. In April, Google and Yahoo!, two of the most widely used Web search engines, also caved. Although Google was vague about its motivation, Yahoo! said "a lack of clarity in the environment" made gambling ads "too risky."
The Justice Department maintains that online gambling is illegal under the 1961 Wire Act, even when the casino or betting parlor is located overseas. But since it's hard to prosecute gambling operations based in other countries (and since placing a bet is not necessarily illegal, depending upon the state where the gambler lives), the government is threatening middlemen instead. Given how broadly the Justice Department seems to be interpreting "aiding and abetting," it could bring charges against not just ad carriers but marketing consultants, banks, Internet service providers, telecommunications companies, computer professionals, and anyone else who facilitates online betting.
But middlemen can be offshored too. A few weeks after Google and Yahoo! said they would stop accepting gambling ads, the U.K.-based AskWinner.com, a casino information site, announced that it was stepping into the breach with "a new pay-per-visitor advertising solution."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I didn't know that branding websites is a felony crime! But what if I'm a blogger and I just mentioned for example Gamblux casino in my posts but it didn't really have the context of "branding" the site, would it still be an offense?
I didn't know that branding websites is a felony crime! But what if I'm a blogger and I just mentioned for example Gamblux casino in my posts but it didn't really have the context of branding the site, would it still be an offense?
xgdfr