Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Almost?

Matt Welch | 12.8.2003 5:17 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

As seen on MSNBC just now, here?s Pitchfork Pat Buchanan, comparing Bush?s likely response to Gore?s dramatic Joe Lieberman snub to the CREEPy old days of 1972:

We were working almost clandestinely to get McGovern the nomination.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Can You Decline An Endorsement?

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (7)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. fyodor   22 years ago

    Did Buchanon get Muskie to cry?

  2. Matt Welch   22 years ago

    Fyodor -- No, but there *was* some Dirty Trick involving that incident, or at least the spin thereof.... Right! It was the "Canuck" thing, which he was busy denying at that press conference -- it was totally made up by a CREEP, and so his response was therefore somewhat emotional (also, there was something about his wife); plus, it was snowing, so what looked like tears may have been a snowball ... but I still blame the Ibogaine Effect.

  3. The Merovingian   22 years ago

    Matt Welch,

    Was this the most corrupt period of American presidential politics ever, or did Nixon simply "get caught?"

  4. Matt Welch   22 years ago

    Merov -- I wrote a longer & incredibly nuanced response, but computer trouble right now prevents me from posting more than about 75 words at a time (don't ask). So, short answer: How the hell should I know?

  5. Mark A.   22 years ago

    "Almost" clandestinely? WTF? Something is either clandestine, or it's not. There is no "almost".

  6. KW   22 years ago

    Is it a given that "working clandestinely" to get a particular opposing candidate nominated is somehow corrupt? Strikes me as the free market at work. Whether it's Democratic voters crossing lines to vote in open primaries (like in 2000), Gray Davis ensuring Riordan's primary defeat, or any (possible) shenanigans going on with the current campaigns, the goal is to gain an advantage over your competition. It's the same thing business owners do every day. Sure, it's unseemly, but nothing new -- and given human nature, unlikely to change.

  7. Douglas Fletcher   22 years ago

    "Was this the most corrupt period of American presidential politics ever, or did Nixon simply "get caught?"

    It probably wasn't the most corrupt (look back at the Grant or Harding administrations) but it certainly was the most entertaining Presidential administration in my life, far more so even than Clinton, I think. Nixon, what a character.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Republican Holdouts

Liz Wolfe | 7.2.2025 9:30 AM

Americans Celebrate Independence Day Less Proud of Their Country Than Ever

J.D. Tuccille | 7.2.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Take a Bite out of Crime

Charles Oliver | 7.2.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's 'Giant Win' Does Not Validate His Unconstitutional Birthright Citizenship Order

Jacob Sullum | 7.2.2025 12:01 AM

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!