See you at the pah-ty!
New at Reason: A variation on the old story of Babe Ruth and the Jewish question—Is Arnold good for the libertarians? Some speculations.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Uh, that Schwarzenegger was elected in a recall is indicative of a longer-term trend "tied to voter skepticism about government in general?" That's a laff or someone is projecting, and it's not just the Golden State.
It might as well have been a Rorschach test for California's ideal body image and vision of manhood. But hey, a butterfly ballot did nicely. Schwarzenegger will be coopted just like everyone else, if he hasn't been already.
If Californians were so sick of goverment they'd already have voted to gut their failing liberal UC public school system and have it properly privatized. If Californians were so sick of government they'd already have voted to privatize their failing public utilities, etc. etc. et goddamn fucking cetera.
I fear, Tim, you've overestimated the voting public's boundless capacity for rationality. But you've got the public's short-term attention span and penchant for celebrity entitlement largely correct.