Tap Happy
Over the weekend, The New York Times reported that the Justice Department is "moving quickly to use its expanded powers for spying on possible terrorists." It was referring to the recent ruling by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review that criminal investigators and intelligence gatherers may cooperate as much they want on secret wiretap requests and freely share information gleaned from the surveillance. Although the Justice Department is thrilled by the ruling, one official insisted that "who you can tap is no different now than it ever was." That may well be true, but should we finding it reassuring? As the Times notes, "the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, which considers surveillance applications, approved all 932 requests for intelligence warrants from the Justice Department last year."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?