The Sunny Side of Donald Trump's Power Grabs
The president is positioning himself to have much greater control over a smaller, enfeebled federal bureaucracy.
The president is positioning himself to have much greater control over a smaller, enfeebled federal bureaucracy.
The penny is expensive to produce and has long outlived its usefulness.
Democrats seem willing to tolerate a lot to get a larger government, but Republicans aren’t much better.
If Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is serious about reducing military spending, he will need to embrace a narrower understanding of national security.
It tries to offset as much as $4.8 trillion—mostly for tax cut extensions—with only $1.5 trillion in supposed spending reductions.
"The only way you get less waste is to give them less money to spend," says the libertarian-adjacent senator from Kentucky.
Elon Musk claims to have uncovered massive fraud within Social Security, but those data are already well known and not a major problem.
Plus: A listener asks the editors to guess if the real reason Donald Trump is so passionate about tariffs is because he sees them as a deal-making tool rather than a purely economic instrument.
Nearly a dozen lawsuits allege that DOGE's access to government payment and personnel systems violates a litany of federal privacy and record-handling laws.
Cutting government spending and calling off the trade war would be steps in the right direction.
Elon Musk, the president's cost-cutting czar, has a habit of overpromising and underdelivering.
After Elon Musk promised "maximum transparency," the DOGE's website posted organizational charts of federal agencies and statistics on the federal work force.
Maybe DOGE will succeed where the U.S. Digital Service (mostly) failed.
Even if the Department of Government Efficiency eliminates all improper payments and fraud, we'll still be facing a debt explosion—which requires structural reform.
The DOGE director wildly exaggerates what can be accomplished by tackling "waste, fraud, and abuse" in government spending without new legislation.
The pretend department’s downgraded mission reflects the gap between Trump’s promise of "smaller government" and the reality of what can be achieved without new legislation.
While Trump can't dissolve the department by executive action, getting rid of it through legislation is still a good idea.
The president's planned National Garden of American Heroes might be a nice idea, but it would be extremely costly—and unnecessary.
We could decentralize education, improve outcomes, and help reduce the size of the federal Leviathan.
As with some other recent executive branch actions, the Trump Administration appears to have overreached.
In the early 1990s, Bill Clinton's administration set out to "reinvent" government. What can the mercurial Tesla CEO learn from their efforts?
Much cutting. Very waste. But the Department of Government Efficiency might not have the legal and budgetary chops to actually reduce spending.
Republicans are betting trillions on the hope that the economy will grow fast enough to cover their deficit spree.
One grant for $1.1 billion was supported by one sheet of paper and didn’t include itemized costs for the project.
Plus: NYC trans medicine protest, airplane collision (again), and more...
Eliminating the deficit requires cutting the biggest spending—defense, Medicare, Social Security. So far, Trump says he won't touch those.
Plus: USAID and Education Department cuts, tariff deal reached, and more...
Almost exactly one year after Congress swore off self-inflicted fiscal crises, we're back to the same tired theatrics.
As tensions rise on campus and in board chambers, districts dish out more for security, lawyers, and staff turnover.
Howard Lutnick told senators that CHIPS Act subsidies were "an excellent down payment."
Inflation and rent prices are down, and the country has a budget surplus.
Plus: RFK Jr.'s plan to squash Big Pharma, J.D. Vance vs. the bishops, and more...
But at least he restored respect for a tariff-loving predecessor by renaming a mountain.
Not doing so could be harmful for just about everyone.
DOGE won't necessarily have to kill any of Republicans’ sacred cows—but they will have to be put on a diet.
For all the excitement about the incoming administration and a return to the 2019 economy, market stability rests on the precarious assumption that the government will eventually put its fiscal house in order.
After four years, the president leaves behind a long, expensive record of non-accomplishment.
How the U.S. military busts its budget on wasteful, careless, and unnecessary 'self-licking ice cream cones.'
The Treasury Secretary’s debt decisions during the pandemic locked in low rates—but only for two years. Now, taxpayers are paying the price.
With inflation risks persisting and entitlement spending surging, the situation cannot be ignored. But we never should have gotten to this point to begin with.
Is Elon Musk a reactionary with a defective bullshit meter or the best part of the second Trump administration?
Charities can focus resources on those who genuinely need a hand while saying no to those who just need "a kick in the butt."
Despite the wasteful spending, E.V.s remain unpopular with large portions of the country.
Plus: A listener asks the editors to consider the Second Amendment's key importance for keeping the government in check.
Plus: Taking gerontocracy to new heights, a real life Arc Reactor, Happy Festivus, and more...
Plus: House Speaker Elon Musk, the value of the debt ceiling, and D.C.'s shut down specials.
Republicans should not give any more money to the Global Engagement Center.
Plus: A failed return to regular order, COVID-era spending scandals, and yet another city tries to shut down a local church's homeless shelter.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10