ACLU to U.S. Government: If You Can Brag About Drone Strike Success, You Can Discuss The Program in Court

Early this month the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the Department of Justice and various government and sundry in order to force their release of documents about their secretive program of targeted drone strikes— particularly those focused on such technically-American targets as the late Anwar Al-Awlaki.

Secretive — see, that's the thing about the program. The government keeps saying on the record that they can't even officially acknowledge the program, but unnamed sources do tend to pop up in media reports on the program. And then of course there's the fact that President Obama admitted the program's existence during the recent Google+ "hangout" town-hall thing and again at a press conference. So, it's definitely real and it's definitely killing people and government officials definitely talk about it with varying degrees of secrecy and specificity. Except that the government is still arguing in court that the program is so secret that it cannot be discussed in front of a judge. The ACLU's lawsuit says no, you can't have that both ways.

Their ACLU Blog of Rights today:

In response to the ACLU’s FOIA request, the government refused to confirm or deny whether it has any records about the CIA’s targeted killing program or about a Justice Department memo that provided legal justification for targeting and killing Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S. citizen born in New Mexico. Yet the government has the chutzpah to sing the praises of the targeted killing program when it thinks doing so will advance its agenda, while insisting that it can’t talkabout the program in front of a federal judge. To be clear, our complaint is not that the government is disclosing information to the press. Indeed, we wish it would disclose more. Our complaint is simply that the government should not be permitted to declare in court that discussing a program would jeopardize national security when it has disclosed the same program to the public.

The New York Times, by the way, is also suing the U.S. Government over the assassination of Al-Awlaki. They want that justification — something beyond "national security" — as well. 

Reason on drones, the war on terror, and the ACLU

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Local Wit||

    Really? Still first?

  • Local Wit||

    I must say, this is a shallow victory.

  • oliver||

    Looking to bring more bisexual passion to your life? Welcome to=== Datebi.C/0/M ===, the world's largest bisexual community for no strings attached encounters. Hundreds of thousands pretty girls and handsome guys eager for hookups, bisexual stands, and discreet affairs are active here. Come in and discover the excitement you deserve! u_u

  • cw||

    Ms. Steigerwald, I believe you meant "discuss," not "discus."

    /sorry

  • Local Wit||

    Did that typo throw you?

  • cw||

    Well, I figured she wasn't referring to the popular track and field sport.

  • Anyway||

    the popular track and field sport

    Discus is hardly "popular." It's not like the Shot Put, or that most glamorous of competitions, the Hop, Skip and Jump.

  • cw||

    Oh, and I see what you did there.

  • Local Wit||

    Puns are the highest form of blog commentary.

  • Local Wit||

    And the typo is still there.
    Your Fan-Club influence must be called into doubt.

    Where's SugarFree?

  • Totally Uncalled-For||

    Servicing Warty?

  • Local Wit||

    Don't think so.
    Warty belongs to John.

  • Anyway||

    Is Lucy a DC creature? She must be out on the town getting trashed with the Movers and Shakers by now. That typo could be here all weekend.

  • cw||

    I've found I have zero influence. Oh well. As a bonus, that's supposed to be how a libertarian feels, right?

    Right?

    Guys...

  • the wind ||

  • Crickets||

  • Tumbleweeds||

  • A Cloud||

  • Elephant Man||

  • A Punchbowl Turd||

  • Michael Dukakis||

  • Navel Lint||

  • Toe Jam||

  • Warty||

  • Wartys Taint||

  • The Peanut Gallery||

    Right!

  • Driver of the Titanic||

  • Lucy Steigerwald||

    "Driver"? Someone needs to brush up on their nautical terms.

  • Inventor of Blogs||

  • Oily Anal Leakage||

  • Fallen, Can't Get Up||

  • Obama's Volt||

    That's I.

  • Every Single Cop, Ever||

  • Head Cheese||

  • Chicken Hot Dogs||

  • 11 oz. Pound of Coffee||

  • ...||

    That is all.

  •  ||

    This is like the best chat room ever.

  • Eduard van Haalen||

    Short and to the point.

  • Baggy Dress Bent Over Dry||

  • 6969 Baggy Dress Lane||

  • 6969 Bent Over Drive||

  • cw||

    So, President Obama, where's that transparency you promised?

  • Paul||

    Obama's got your transparency... right here baby, right here.

  • The Obombster||

    "I have five more long years of transparency to give you. With TWO Obama Volts for every garage."

  • cw||

    And the NYT is suing, too? That's good to hear.

  • NYT Jeering Heckler||

    Kind of amusing, too.

  • ||

    Very sloppy. stupid/arrogance/authoritarian

  • ||

    ACLU sues government.

    Government responds, "fuck you, that's why."

  • Socialism is Murder||

    Socialization of wealth provides the means for the warmongers to monger war.

  • Matt Osborne||

    Once upon a time, it was customary for intelligence agencies to kill the enemy in wartime without asking permission of a judge first. Officially, the United States is at war with al-Qaeda and anyone who harbors, supports, or gives sanctuary to al-Qaeda. As far as the "details" of the program go, the ACLU has no need to know how the CIA is picking targets, and neither does the New York Times. Telling them could endanger sources, i.e. GET PEOPLE KILLED, or endanger methods, i.e. GET PEOPLE KILLED. And until Glenn Greenwald offers a better plan than a drone strike, it's still the most efficient and least-bad way to find and kill the enemy in a "lawless tribal zone." We tried arresting the bad guys before -- it was the Blackhawk Down incident, and it killed hundreds of Somalis. That is NOT better than a drone strike.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement