In selling the stimulus to the American public
last year, the Obama administration promised that the massive
spending package would serve as a sort of Keynesian Red Bull,
allowing the tired economy to keep partying hard. Instead, private
sector output fell sharply and unemployment climbed. Yet Obama
continues to defend the stimulus, aided in no small part by legally
required reports issued by the Congressional Budget Office. But as
Peter Suderman explains, those reports rely on assumption-packed
models that effectively predetermine their outcomes. What they say,
in essence, is that the stimulus worked because we assume it
did.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245