The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
"The Docket that Shall Not Be Named"
A discussion of the [shadow/interim/emergency/other] docket with Professor Kate Shaw.
On Wednesday, I participated in the Rappaport Forum at Harvard Law School on "The Docket that Shall Not Be Named" with Professor Kate Shaw. The discussion was moderated by Professor Richard Re.
As regular readers would expect, I sought to put discussion of the Supreme Court's "shadow docket" into perspective and explain why I believe it is premature to draw conclusions about what the pattern of recent decisions regarding requests for interim relief says about the Court, the Court's relationship to the executive branch, or even the Court's relationship with the second Trump Administration.
I was supposed to be participating in person. Alas, the weather and the airlines did not accommodate. So while I had to participate Oz-style, as a disembodied head on the wall, I believe we had a worthwhile discussion. Video below.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I think we can make some general conclusions since the uptick in the "shadow docket," as shown by Steve Vladeck's book, has been going on now for around a decade.
"The Docket that Shall Not Be Named"
Perhaps the Riddle Docket?