The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
UCLA Appeals Yesterday's Preliminary Injunction That Ordered It to Avoid Repetition of Exclusion of Jewish or Pro-Israel Students from Parts of Campus
[UPDATE 8/23/24: UCLA has just dropped the appeal.]
As yesterday's post noted, the injunction provides,
[1.] Defendants [UCLA officials] … are prohibited from offering any ordinarily available programs, activities, or campus areas to students if Defendants know the ordinarily available programs, activities, or campus areas are not fully and equally accessible to Jewish students.
[2.] Defendants are prohibited from knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students from ordinarily available portions of UCLA's programs, activities, and campus areas, whether as a result of a de-escalation strategy or otherwise.
[3.] On or before August 15, 2024, Defendants shall instruct Student Affairs Mitigator/Monitor ("SAM") and any and all campus security teams (including without limitation UCPD and UCLA Security) that they are not to aid or participate in any obstruction of access for Jewish students to ordinarily available programs, activities, and campus areas.
[4.] For purposes of this order, all references to the exclusion of Jewish students shall include exclusion of Jewish students based on religious beliefs concerning the Jewish state of Israel.
[5.] Nothing in this order prevents Defendants from excluding Jewish students from ordinarily available programs, activities, and campus areas pursuant to UCLA code of conduct standards applicable to all UCLA students.
[6.] Absent a stay of this injunction by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, this preliminary injunction shall take effect on August 15, 2024, and remain in effect pending trial in this action or further order of this Court or the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
For more on the District Court's reasoning, see here. Under Ninth Circuit rules, appeals of preliminary injunctions are generally heard within several months.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Court: Stop letting protestors block Jews on your campus!
UCLA: No! We insist on the right of protestors to block Jews on our campus!
Seriously, UCLA, just keep the peace on your campus and make sure everyone can get to their classes without getting fucked with.
Heard within several months is exactly what this appeal deserves.
And yet, 80% of Jews will vote for the Democrat this election. No sympathy.
If Democratic / "liberal" establishment's reaction to Hamas's 10/7/23 attack in Israel (and its aftermath here) doesn't change American Jews' voting patterns, nothing will.
There's some hope though:
https://nypost.com/2024/07/16/opinion/bidens-loss-of-jewish-support-could-cost-dems-the-presidency-and-more/
https://nypost.com/2024/08/11/us-news/trump-gop-eye-record-share-of-jewish-vote-over-antisemitism-a-real-issue/
The question is how close left-wing academics and the Squad are to the Democratic leadership. And the answer is, “not very”. But the right loves to pretend that these people represent the party, which they don’t, and then with implied anti-Semitism – sadly, sometimes from Jews too stupid to work this out – criticise Jews who vote Democrat. The anti-Semitism arises from thinking that Jews in general are too stupid or blind to realise that voting for the Democrats is like turkeys voting for Thanksgiving.
Also, have the GOP publicly renounced white supremacy?
Isn't that sort of like demanding that somebody renounce wife beating? Only actual wife beaters need to do it, non-wife beaters are usually best off ignoring such demands.
No.
they're extremely close to the democratic leadership. god you're a moron.
they’re extremely close to the democratic leadership.
Been reading One Reich News again?
god you’re a moron.
God may well be a moron, if he exists. Cf "Preacher".
It was Jesus who was the moron in Preacher.
God didn't exist, except he did, except that was an actor pretending to be God, except it was God pretending to be an actor pretending to be God.
There’re different ways to “keep the peace”…
Mark Steyn, 2015:
(In case it isn’t clear, I am not advocating this approach. But, considering UCLA’s previous appeasement of the “anti-Zionists,” I wouldn’t put it past them…)
Mulched — Yeah, for all values of, “keep the peace,” consistent with, “suppress protest of Israeli war policy.”
You’re right Lathrop, let those racists keep those jews from accessing buildings so they can't learn. You lead the way.
I agree that, as a practical matter, protests of Israeli war policy are almost always going to involve discriminatory action against Jews; They're organized by anti-Semitic organizations associated with Hamas, so it could hardly be otherwise.
So the injunction does present the university with a choice of either suppressing such protests or shutting down entirely any part of the campus where they occur. And the latter course of action would cause the university to face probably successful lawsuits for breach of contract from students who were paying for educations they weren't getting.
Well, the university SHOULD suppress any protest that attempts to deny students access to campus facilities or classes. Just as a matter of course, regardless of the motivation behind the protest. There's no reason that sort of thing ever should be tolerated.
You are a worm. A mob that requires people to state political views in order to access libraries, classrooms etc. needs to be suppressed, one way or another.
"Suppress criminal and discriminatory protest of Israeli war policy."
Fixed it for you. Learn to protest within the law and without harming others. Assuming you are capable of such learning.
The PI decision was pretty clear that the principle is equal access. If non-Jews can go somewhere, the school better make sure Jews can go there too.
This isn’t groundbreaking stuff. It’s the foundation of educational civil rights law.
I will look forward to UCLA enlightening us on why a PI requiring them to follow the law is worth an appeal.
Isn't depriving someone of equal university access on the basis of religion a federal crime? Why isn't that being mentioned, here? You'd think there would be hearings about campus police being derelict in their duties or something.
Under the theory that they used to prosecute Hillary meme guy, they could easily be prosecuted.
Once again, this is why there is a Second Amendment. For whatever reason, UCLA doesn't want to take the necessary means to ensure that people, not just Jews, can go about their day without being accosted by a bunch of thugs. So what is to be done? A couple of twits in the other post seem to think that someone who insists upon is right of free movement is somehow causing a confrontation, which, of course, has it exactly backwards. These people constitute a mob. If one insists upon walking to the library without the pledge, then that person is in serious danger as he/she are outnumbered. That's one of the reasons why we have a right to keep and bear arms. I can guarantee you that were I a student at UCLA, I'd be carrying an Israeli flag, wearing an Israeli military uniform or what have you. And yes, I'd probably get beaten, but I'd give as good as I got. F these thugs. If the police aren't going to do something about it, a free citizenry has the right.
Please please please go enroll at UCLA.
Why, because you want me to be beaten for simply refusing to kowtow to a fucking mob. You are an un--American thug fanboy.
Did you hear about the ignorant asshole who thinks that, if he goes somewhere armed, that he can deliberately try to provoke a confrontation so that he can immediately retaliate with gunfire?
I think his username was Will B. Imprisoned.
Wrong premise, Jason. If he merely walks through an area where he has every right to be and is attacked by the mob because he will not comply with their unjustifiable demands, he is not legally considered to have provoked anything, so if he uses a firearm that he is licensed to carry in self defense the only issue is whether it was self defense. Look at the Kyle Rittenhouse case in Kenosha, Wisconsin: he had every right to be there and so was entitled to exercise a right of self defense when attacked. That addresses only the legal issue, not whether it is smart or not to put oneself in that situation.
We're talking about people who literally claim Zimmerman was the aggressor because he had the nerve to share a sidewalk with Trayvon Martin. They've got really strange ideas about what constitutes "provocation".
It says a lot more about you than me that you would think that wearing Israeli flags etc. would constitute a legal provocation. The real issue, dipshit, is that you have government (UCLA is a state institution) tolerating, day after day, a mob that conditions one's right to walk freely. This is an intolerable state of affairs, and guess what, the government's inaction cannot allow rights to be taken away. If I am where I have every right to be, the actions of a fucking mob cannot take away whatever right I have to self-defense if I do nothing wrong. That you have zero concern for the rights of others to move about freely says that you are nothing but a fucking fascist fanboy.
Reflections on historical records:
The Book of Esther, verses 11 & 12. (read the whole book for context)
11 The king’s edict gave the Jews in each and every city the right to assemble and defend themselves, to destroy, kill, and annihilate every ethnic and provincial army hostile to them, including women and children, and to take their possessions as spoils of war. 12 This would take place on a single day throughout all the provinces of King Ahasuerus, on the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, the month Adar.
Since most of us don't have easy access to the court documents, what is the reasoning in their appeal? What legal error is UCLA alleging occurred?
All they have to do at this stage is file a Notice of Appeal. It's a one-page document stating that we are appealing the district court's order. That's it.
When they file briefs you can see their reasoning.
One suspects that they have no reasoning and that there is a good chance that they will either withdraw the appeal or be risking sanctions for a frivolous appeal under Rule 38.
The Democrats went back to standing in the schoolhouse door and racist thuggery so quickly one can barely remember that short interval when they pretended to not be racist.
At least we have the books and movies pretending that they gave a crap.
Yes and Republicans are all white supremacist Nazis.
Well ... except they're not.
Other than that ... here's a cookie.
Have you always been this stupid, or did you have to work at it?
The detailed injunction outlined in this post underscores a significant step towards ensuring equal access and Mapquest Directions protection for Jewish students at UCLA