The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Recent Books on the Constitution
My seminar picks for 2024 (and every year since 2005).
Each fall, I teach a seminar called Recent Books on the Constitution. I initially designed this course when I visited Georgetown in 2005. At that time, because I tend to read what relates directly to my current projects, I felt that I was not keeping up with the literature. By assigning recent books on the Constitution to read as part of my teaching, I would actually read them. This has really worked for me. I have now read a lot of books on the Constitution. The complete list of all the books I have assigned is below.
Since 2005, I have assigned 95 books by 87 authors, with James Fleming, Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, Kim Roosevelt, and David Bernstein each making more than 1 appearances. Four books were assigned in manuscript before publication. This fall, I am assigning a portion of my book Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People, which is not as recent as The Original Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment: Its Letter and Spirit but relates more closely to the other books the students will read. Here are this year's 5 "recent books on the Constitution":
-
Jonathan Turley, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage (2024)
-
Jeffrey Rosen, The Pursuit of Happiness: How Classical Writers on Virtue Inspired the Lives of the Founders and Defined America (2024)
-
Robert Cottrol & Brannon Denning, To Trust the People with Arms: The Supreme Court and the Second Amendment (2023)
-
Nathan Chapman & MIchael McConnell, Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience (2023)
-
Anthony Sanders, Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters (2023)
I select books I think I ought to read–either because of the subject or the author. I then hold off reading them myself so I can read them at the same time as the students. This enables me to react to the books along with them, and for me to remember the nuances of the books for class discussion.
The seminar format is to read 6 books, taking 2 weeks on each book, with the author coming to the class during the second week to discuss the book. The first book is now always one of mine to use as a trial run and to give the students an idea of where I am coming from when we discuss the other books. When books are longer than 250 pages, I ask the author to tell me which 250 pages I should assign. If I assign much more than 125 pages per week, I fear the students won't read them, or won't read them carefully enough. To help assure that they do, students submit one-page summaries of each half of the book (graded pass-fail). On the day before the author's visit, they submit a 5500 character critique of the book, which I send to the author electronically the day before class. (They all read them.) When the class ends, there is no exam or paper for the students to write or for me to grade. We are done!
Students consistently tell me that the course is extremely enriching, and helps them develop their critical skills. It is also empowering for them to see how well they are able to find the holes in a professor's book-length presentation. I find that, collectively, the students are able to nail the weaknesses of every book (except mine, of course).
[Note to law professors: I have a budget to pay for the authors' travel expenses. But now that we all have access to Zoom teaching, this seminar format can be replicated anywhere at zero cost. Wouldn't it be great if there were a dozen or more such book seminars around the country? Try it. I promise you will love it.]
If you click on READ MORE you will see why teaching this class has been enormously rewarding for me. Offer my heartfelt thanks to all these authors for trekking to DC to discuss their books with my students.
2023
- James Fleming, Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process (2022)
- Paul Moreno, How the Court Became Supreme: The Origins of American Juristocracy (2022)
- Vincent Philip Munoz, Religious Liberty and the American Founding (2022)
- Justin Dyer & Kody Cooper, The Classical and Christian Origins of American Politics (2022)
- Kermit Roosevelt, The Nation That Never Was: Reconstructing America's Story (2022)
2022:
- Helen Norton, The Government's Speech and the Constitution (2020)
- Aziz Huq, The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies (2021)
- David Bernstein, Classified: The Untold Story of Racial Classification in America (2022)
- Stuart Banner, The Decline of Natural Law: How American Lawyers Once Used Natural Law and Why they Stopped (2021)
- Philip Hamburger, Purchasing Submission: Conditions, Power, and Freedom (2021)
2021:
- Ilan Wurman, The Second Founding: An Introduction to the 14th Amendment (2020)
- Stephen Halbrook, The Right to Bear Arms: A Constitutional Right of the People or a Privilege of the Ruling Class? (2021)
- Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021)
- Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021)
- David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. Maryland (2019)
2020:
- Paul Finkelman, Supreme Injustice: Slavery in the Nation's Highest Court (2017)
- Eric Segall, Originalism as Faith (2018)
- Greg Weiner, The Political Constitution: The Case Against Judicial Supremacy (2019)
- Robert Ross, The Framers' Intentions: The Myth of the Nonpartisan Constitution (2019)
- Jack Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (2020)
2019:
- Neal Devins, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (2019)
- Larry Lessig, Fidelity & Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (2019)
- Jonathan Gienapp, The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (2018)
- Rebecca Zietlow, The Forgotten Emancipator: James Mitchell Ashley and the Ideological Origins of Reconstruction (2017)
- Lee Strang, Originalism's Promise: A Natural Law Account of the American Constitution (2019)
2018:
- Martha Jones, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America (2018)
- John Compton, The Evangelical Origins of the Living Constitution (2014)
- Josh Chafetz, Congress's Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers (2017)
- Adam Carrington, Justice Stephen Field's Cooperative Constitution of Liberty: Liberty in Full (2017)
- Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (2018)
2017:
- Barry Friedman, Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission (2017)
- Bruce Frohnen & George Carey, Constitutional Morality and the Rise of Quasi-Law (2016)
- Geoffrey R. Stone, Sex and the Constitution (2017)
- Suja Thomas, The Missing American Jury (2016)
- Thomas G. West, The Political Theory of the American Founding (2017)
2016:
- Carson Holloway, Hamilton versus Jefferson in the Washington Administration: Completing the Founding or Destroying the Founding? (2015)
- Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015)
- Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016)
- Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015)
- Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (2015)
2015:
- Damon Root, Over Ruled: The Long War for the Control of the U.S. Supreme Court (Palgrave 2014)
- F.H. Buckley, The Once and Future King: The Rise of Crown Government in America (Encounter 2014)
- Brad Snyder, The House of Truth (Oxford 2017) (assigned ms)
- Stephen Garbaum, The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2013)
- Laura Donohue, The Future of Foreign Intelligence (Chicago 2016) (assigned ms)
2014:
- Clark Neily, Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution's Promise of Limited Government (Encounter 2013)
- Thomas Healy, The Great Dissent: How Oliver Wendell Holmes Changes His Mind – and the History of Free Speech in America (Metropolitan Books, 2013)
- John McGinnis & Michael Rappaport, Originalism and the Good Constitution (Harvard 2013)
- Stephen Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard 2013)
- Garrett Epps, American Epic: Reading the U.S. Constitution (Oxford 2013)
- Louis Michael Seidman, On Constitutional Disobedience (Oxford 2012)
2012 (Fall):
- Gerard Magliocca, John Bingham: America's Founding Son (NYU, 2013) (assigned ms)
- Akhil Reed Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution (Basic Books, 2012)
- John Inazu, Liberty's Refuge: The Forgotten Freedom of Assembly (Yale 2012)
- Justice Antonin Scalia, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (West, 2012)
- Abner Greene, Against Obligation (Harvard 2012)
- Sandy Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford 2012)
2012 (Spring)
- Michael J. Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008)
- Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011)
- Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010)
- Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012)
- Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012)
- Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004)
2011:
- H. Jefferson Powell, Constitutional Conscience (Chicago, 2008)
- Jeremy A Rabkin, Law Without Nations? (Princeton, 2005)
- Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns (Cambridge, 2007)
- Timothy Sandefur, The Right to Earn a Living (Cato Institute, 2010)
- Sonu Bedi, Rejecting Rights (Cambridge, 2009)
- Alison LaCroix, The Ideological Origins of American Federalism (Harvard, 2010)
2010:
- David Bernstein, Rehabilitating Lochner (Chicago 2011) (assigned ms)
- Brian Tamanaha, The Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton, 2009)
- Earl Maltz, Slavery and the Supreme Court, 1825-1861 (Kansas, 2009)
- Michael Vorenberg, Final Freedom: The Civil War, the Abolition of Slavery, and the Thirteenth Amendment (Cambridge, 2004)
- George Thomas,The Madisonian Constitution (Johns Hopkins, 2008)
- David Strauss, The Living Constitution (Oxford, 2010)
2007:
- Alex Aleinikoff, Semblances of Sovereignty: The Constitution, the State, and American Citizenship (Harvard, 2002)
- Dan Farber, Retained by the People: The "Silent" Ninth Amendment and the Constitutional Rights Americans Don't Know They Have (Perseus, 2007)
- Jim Fleming, Securing Constitutional Democracy: The Case of Autonomy (Chicago, 2006)
- Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge, 2006)
- Keith Whittington, Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History (Princeton, 2007)
2006:
- Philip Hamburger, Separation of Church and State (Harvard, 2002)
- Kermit Roosevelt, The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions (Yale, 2006)
- Elizabeth Price Foley, Liberty for All: Reclaiming Individual Privacy in a New Era of Public Morality (Yale, 2006)
- John Yoo, The Powers of War and Peace : The Constitution and Foreign Affairs after 9/11 (Chicago, 2005)
- Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It) (Oxford, 2006)
2005 (Taught when I was a visitor at Georgetown. Only Mark Tushnet, who was then still on the Georgetown faculty, appeared. His class visit gave me the idea to invite all the authors in the future):
- Mark Tushnet, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, 2000)
- Cass R. Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Harvard, 2001)
- Larry D. Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review (Oxford, 2004)
- Daniel A. Farber, Suzanna Sherry, Desperately Seeking Certainty: The Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundations (Chicago, 2004)
- James R. Stoner, Common Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism (Kansas, 2003)
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A lineup heavy on culture war rejects.
I hope Georgetown -- which tries be part of modern, mainstream America -- has learned its lesson.
Turdley drops another one. 😉
Do students attend Georgetown for a course on Federalist Society thinking? Prof. Barnett may be confusing Georgetown for Liberty, Regent, Brigham Young, or Ave Maria. This course would probably be great at Hillsdale Online, too.
This sounds like a lot of fun. Makes me wish I was still in law school. I’m sure the students love it. Great Idea, Prof. Barnett. And kudos on the excellent podcast with Charlie Cooke recently. That was the best, most succinct, most persuasive explanation of originalism I’ve heard. Well done.
Stephen Breyer's book is a disappointment. "Active Liberty" is still his best book to read as an alternative for St. Scalia.
Another new book is "The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take it Back" by Madiba K. Dennie.
Gerard Magliocca's books tend to be interesting. His new book about Robert Jackson's Youngstown concurrence sounds promising.
OTOH, Gorsuch's book does not. Jackson's might be interesting.
I find Magliocca the most interesting constitutional scholar since Sandy Levinson retired. And he's quite approachable, too, glad to respond to emails concerning his blog posts over at Balkinization or ELB.
Dennie sounds like somebody who can't distinguish disagreeing with her from being an extremist. The Court hasn't taken ANY extreme positions lately relative to general public opinion. Only relative to left-wing opinion...
Stones/glasshouses
It's true. I'm an extremist, and objective enough to know it. The present Court? They're pretty mainstream, that's what pisses the left off: The Court is no longer assisting them in imposing the left's agenda. It's hardly imposing the right's positive agenda, though.
Like Dobbs, in overturning Roe, instead of declaring the unborn to be 14th amendment people, (A genuine extremist pro-life position.) just said that abortion wasn't a federal issue, and returned it to the states to do what they wanted.
That wasn't extremism, it was just ceasing to do the left's work for them.
tl;dr
Do students attend Georgetown for a course on Federalist Society Thought? Prof. Barnett may be confusing Georgetown for Liberty, Regent, Brigham Young, or Ave Maria. This course would probably be great at Hillsdale Online, too.