The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Supreme Court OT2023 at the End of May
The justices have been slow and quite agreeable -- so far.
Today the Supreme Court issued three more opinions, bringing the total number of decisions to 29 so far this term (out of 61 argued cases). This is a slower pace than usual for the Court, despite the smaller docket, but on par with what we saw last term.
Here is the number of opinions issued by the end of May this year as compared with the total in each of the prior five terms:
- OT2023 - 29
- OT2022 - 29
- OT2021 - 33
- OT2020 - 39
- OT2019 - 36
- OT2018 - 44
The relative slowdown is noticeable. What's the cause? One possibility is that whatever processes the Court adopted in the wake of the Dobbs leak have slowed down the Court's work. Another possibility is that the remaining cases are sufficiently difficult or divisive that they are taking more time to complete. Whatever the cause, the Court will have to average a decision a day to finish its work by the end of June.
While the Court has been relatively slow to issue opinions, it is showing a surprising degree of unanimity. The justices have been unanimous in the judgment in 20 of the 29 cases decided thus far, including today's unanimous decision by Justice Sotomayor in NRA v. Vullo, siding with the National Rifle Association against New York financial regulators. Of the remaining nine cases, two were decided 7-2 and seven were decided 6-3. Of potential interest, only three of the 6-3 decisions issued thus far split the Court along traditional conservative-liberal lines. In two of those three cases the majority was written by Justice Alito (Thornell, Alexander). Justice Kavanaugh wrote the opinion in the third (Culley).
There are good reasons to think that the Court's will be less unanimous -- and perhaps more conservative -- than what we have seen so far this term, and not just because the Court tends to issue the most controversial and politically divisive decisions at the end of the term. So far this term, the liberal justices have authored a disproportionate share of the Court's opinions (thirteen of twenty-seven signed opinions), despite representing only one third of the Court. Based on what we have seen thus far, the Court's liberals are likely to have relatively few of the remaining majority opinions.
In terms of individual opinion authorship, here is where we stand.
- Sotomayor: 6
- Kagan: 4
- Alito: 3
- Kavanaugh: 3
- Barrett: 3
- Jackson: 3
- Thomas: 2
- Gorsuch: 2
- CJ Roberts: 1
There have also been two per curiam opinions, and some cases are likely to be merged into a single opinion (e.g. the two Chevron cases, Relentless and Loper-Bright will almost certainly be decided in a single opinion).
Given that the Court heard argument in 61 cases, each justice will only have six or seven decisions, so Justice Sotomayor may be done with writing majority opinions this term, and Kagan and Jackson may only a few each left. Of the thirty-ish opinions to come, I think we can expect over two-thirds of them to be written by one of the Court's conservatives. The Chief Justice in particular has been holding his powder dry, having only taken one decision for himself thus far. Do not be surprised if he writes for the Court in both the Trump immunity case and the Chevron cases.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Aren't the more controversial cases generally left until the end? That's my very unscientific impression.
Because they take longer to decide or because the Justices want to get out of town after releasing them?
The interesting process of elimination / Gutman Scaling analysis is who has the pencil in Rahimi (the big 2A case of the term, IMO).
In the fall term, there are 19 cases that will have opinions (treating consolidated cases as 1, and ignoring the two already disposed of with a PC opinion or GVR). If there’s the usual roughly equal distribution of opinions, each justice writes two and one writes three, with slightly longer odds that two justices write three, one (Sotomajor) writes one (which appears more likely, as she’s done a bunch of the Spring term opinions), and everyone else writes two.
Current tally of opinions from fall term cases:
Roberts 0
Thomas 1
Alito 2
Kagan 2
Sotomajor 1
Gorsuch 1
Kavanaugh 2
Barrett 2
Jackson 2
All the October cases have issued. Only two left from the early November panels are Rahimi and a 1st Amendment / TM case. So right now the odds are that Roberts, Thomas, or Gorsuch have the pencil on Rahimi. If anyone other than Roberts writes on the 1A / TM case, he becomes the prohibitive favorite for Rahimi, as otherwise it would mean that he did not write on any case for two straight months . . . which would be VERY unusual.
And if Roberts has the pencil on a 2A case, we should all be afraid. VERY afraid.
Rahimi is likely to lose 9-0, if it makes you feel better, so it doesn't really matter who writes it.
Wow, looks like we really need to expand the Court!
I love these sort of inside baseball posts. They give me some insights into aspects of the legal system that I'd never otherwise learn.
Maybe the super yacht travel schedules of Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch are slowing the process? It probably takes most of a day just to reach Harlan Cow’s superyacht, that other billionaire’s private fishing lodge, or those stag destinations in Thailand with Leonard Leo.
We have 29 opinions and there are around 36 or so more cases left (Amy Howe). So let’s say each justice gets around six to seven opinions. (We had a few per curiams.)
Sotomayor is about done. It is somewhat interesting that Jackson only has three. There are more low-temperature cases for junior justices like her to write. Roberts/Thomas/Gorsuch are behind schedule. They are likely to have some big cases.
Alito had none until recently & now he has three.
It is somewhat silly to back-end so many cases to June. Controversial decisions can be divided more evenly, including dropping some in May.
They have slowly releasing opinions and now are releasing a few every Thursday. They will increase the rate by mid-June.