The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! The October Term 2022 of FantasySCOTUS is now in session
Predict all of the biggest cases at the Supreme Court.
I am honored to open up the 14th Season of FantasySCOTUS. I launched the site back in 2009 when I was still clerking. Now, more than decade later, thousands of Court watchers have made their predictions. Sign up today at FantasySCOTUS.net to predict the outcome of all the blockbusters this term, including Sackett, Merrill, Students for Fair Admission, Moore, 303 Creative, and others.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It still shows Breyer as an active judge and not Ketanji Brown Jackson
"It still shows Breyer as an active judge and not Ketanji Brown Jackson"
Scholarship, South Texas style.
Which may be inconsistent with standards at Yale.
Why does the signup say "Do you tend to agree more with the policies of the Republicans or the Democrats?" and then give you a choice of -3 to +3 "liberal" or "conservative"? My answers to each of those would be quite different - particularly if the latter is supposed to map to the ideologies of the justices.
I hope you are kidding.
A demo version (some of these are well worth a listen).