The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Judicial Review of Congress Updated and Expanded
A comprehensive catalog of every case in which the Court considered a constitutional challenge to an act of Congress
I have now posted to my personal website an updated and expanded version of the Judicial Review of Congress Database. You may find here the database itself, a description of the variables, a description of how the cases were identified and selected, and a text list of the cases invalidating a provision of an act of Congress in whole or in part. (A comparable list of cases upholding acts of Congress against constitutional challenge is still in process, though the cases themselves are included in the JRC Database.)
The Judicial Review of Congress Database catalogs all the cases in which the U.S. Supreme Court has substantively reviewed the constitutionality of a provision or application of a federal law. The dataset aims to be the most comprehensive accounting of Supreme Court cases both upholding and invalidating provisions of federal statutes. It does not include cases decided in the lower courts that address the constitutional validity of federal statutory provisions, except to the extent that those cases eventually found their way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The database currently includes 1323 cases decided by the Court from its founding through its October 2021 term and related pieces of information about those cases.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is the smoking gun for the arrest warrant. Insurrection agsinst the constitution. 10 year hard labor in federal prison for every Justice.
How can the Court's actions be considered, "Insurrection against the constitution," when the Constitution actually states:
In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. (Art 3, Sec 3 Cl 2)
The language of Article I Section 1 is plain. All legislative powers are to the Congress. Judicial review is prohibited.
The clause you quoted has the Supreme Court apply the law, not make the law. Repealing laws is making laws.
People want judicial review? Amend.
The language of Article III Section 1 is plain. The judicial power is vested in the courts. Judicial review is the judicial power.
Judicial review is the judicial power.
Where did you get that. Davey Boy?
This kind of database is enormously helpful to people who study the history of Supreme Court review of laws. It's also tedious to assemble. So thanks to Prof. Whittington for taking the time and effort to compile it!
Is there an updated version of the graph? It looks like it only goes to 2015.
Queenie Baby, great comment, bruh. See you next Tuesday.
Agreed.