The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
My Published Inaugural Edwin Meese III Originalism Lecture
"Originalism and Stare Decisis in the Lower Courts"
On March 24, 2022, I delivered the inaugural Edwin Meese III Originalism Lecture at the Heritage Foundation. The primary topic of my remarks was "Originalism and Stare Decisis in the Lower Courts."
The Heritage Foundation has now published my remarks. Here is a summary:
Lower-court judges can expand their use of constitutional originalism, and judges who adopt this framework will influence the bench and the bar to become more familiar with originalism. Law firms that want to persuade originalist judges will rationally incorporate originalist arguments into their briefs—whether voluntarily or in response to a court order. Public defenders in particular would be well-served to think in terms of originalism: Conservative jurists may be personally opposed to the plight of the accused but still favor the rights of the accused as originally understood. As the bench and bar are acculturated to originalism, it will become far more normal for the Supreme Court to base its decisions on originalism.
I am honored to have been selected for this distinguished award.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“I am honored to have been selected for this distinguished award.“
I think we all agree that you deserve it.
How about complying with the plain English of the constitution, without any label? If you do not like its obsolete content, amend it.
Not to intrude on your enjoyment of your honor, Professor Blackman, but is there anything to this originalism business other than the chant you offer in your summary above?
Prof. Blackman,
Can you tell us the specific type of originalism you are referring to or prefer?
Framework Originalism
Intrinsicist Originalism
Instrumental Originalism
Original Intent
Original Meaning
Original Methods Originalism
Original Public Meaning
Semantic Originalism
Structuralism
Textualism
That is all academic gibberish. Garbage distinctions without real difference.
Critical Race Originalism
Living Originalism
Post-Structuralism
Original Feels and Vibes Originalism
Original Private Meaning
Mind reading originalism.
Mind reading of the dead people originalism
Imposing feelings, whims of the day, and biases, then making shit up to justify them with lawyer gibberish originalism
They pick the "ism" that gets to the desired result.
If some originalism and/or textualism can get you to ISL, for example, it can get you anywhere. Or, you can just pick another one.
Yes, lower courts are bound by decisions of the Supreme Court, whether those decisions were originalist or not -- but do originalist decisions have precedential value?
Originalism -- still less popular, less attractive, and less influential than Kim Kardashian, with roughly the same likely lifespan.
But, as conservatives love to point out, right-wing originalism is slightly older than Kim Kardashian.
Carry on, clingers. So far and so long as your betters permit.
(That one became this one)
Rev why you still talkin' you hypocrite? You need to STFU until you resign your law firm and interview your replacement diverse. Until then you are just talkin' trash, meaningless, hypocritical trash.
Yet he agrees w/you, Daivd.
This guy claims to be good at writing.
" we won the battle of ideas "
The American divide:
Reason vs. superstition
Tolerance vs. bigotry
Science vs. dogma
Progress vs. backwardness
Education vs. ignorance
Inclusiveness vs. insularity
Modern, educated, successful communities vs. can't-keep-up rural and southern stretches
Our strongest teaching and research institutions vs. backwater religious schooling
Modernity vs. pining for "good old days" that never existed
Along which of these fronts are conservatives winning?
Delusional clingers are among my favorite culture war casualties.
"The Heritage Foundation has now published my remarks."
Well, that's good, I guess, but in my case their publication was entirely superfluous, because I'd already committed them to memory, on March 25, 2022. Try me sometime!
Apparently one permanent effect of the plague period is the demolition of the long-standing norm of sporting the bare minimum of a decent hairdo for public appearances.
He's starting to look like Josh Mostel in "Jesus Christ Superstar".
It looks like he expects his hair to function as an oil cooler for his skull.
Ha
"Public defenders in particular would be well-served to think in terms of originalism: "
Like that espoused by Thomas and Gorsuch in Garza v. Idaho, 139 S.Ct. 738, dissenting part III? Where they castigate Gideon and argue that the original meaning only meant that if you were rich enough you could hire an attorney, but if you were poor too bad? And they don't want to hear anything about 'evolving' due process standards, either.
So "public defenders" would be unnecessary, unless the states felt like providing defense counsel out of the goodness of their hearts.
Originalism: 18th century protections against 21st century dangers.