The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Rarity of November Decisions in Argued Cases
In recent years, the Supreme Court has rarely issued opinions in argued cases, and they were almost always written by RBG.
The announcement that the Supreme Court will issue one or more opinions tomorrow has fueled speculation that we may get a decision in one or both of the S.B.8 cases. The Court heard Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson and United States v. Texas on an expedited basis, so perhaps this speculation is well-founded. The Court accelerated its consideration in Ramirez v. Collier, a death penalty case, as well. So that's another possibility.
One factor fueling the speculation that the Court will decide one or both S.B.8 cases tomorrow is that, in recent years, the Court has rarely issued opinions in argued cases in November, and most of those were authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Here's a rundown of recent October and November Supreme Court decisions,
OT2021 - Two per curiam opinions issued in October, neither in an argued case. We'll see what November brings.
OT2020 - Three per curiam opinions issued in November, none in an argued case.
OT2019 - One per curiam opinion issued in November, not in an argued case.
OT2018 - Two signed opinions in argued cases in November, Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (by Justice Ginsburg) and Wyerehauser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (by Chief Justice Roberts). Both were unanimous.
OT2017 - Two per curiam opinions issued in November, neither in an argued case. One signed, unanimous opinion in an argued case, Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago (by Justice Ginsburg).
OT2016 - One per curiam opinion in November, not in an argued case. One signed, unanimous opinion in Bravo-Fernandez v. United States (by Justice Ginsburg; Justice Thomas had a concurrence).
OT2015 - One per curiam opinion each in October and November, neither in an argued case.
OT2014 - One per curiam opinion in October and three per curiam opinions in November, none in an argued case.
What this shows is that signed opinions in argued cases are quite rare in November, and the few we get tend to be relatively straightforward opinions in "easy" cases that produced unanimous opinions. It also helped when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the Court, as she was routinely the first to issue a signed opinion. The Court's merit docket has been shrinking, on the other hand, so maybe the justices have had more time to work on opinions this Fall.
So it would be unusual for the Court to issue a signed opinion in an argued case tomorrow unless, of course, the Court felt the need to resolve a case quickly, as may be the case with the S.B. 8 cases. We will know whether this is the case tomorrow.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The opinion will be very brief, authored by Thomas and joined by Gorsuch, Alito, Barrett, and Kavanaugh:
NYSRPA vs Bruen:
"The right to bear arms shall not be infringed mfers. The second circuit is REVERSED and REMANDED for a biatch slapping."
Vegas says it's WWH v. Jackson.
If you want to bet on Ramirez (instead of, not in addition to WWH v. Jackson), you can make 20:1.
where do I see Vegas odds on this?
I think it'll be one opinion for all three cases ruling that fetuses can only be aborted when a minister is allowed to lay hands on them and say prayers during the abortion. Thomas will author the opinion arguing that abortionists are the real racists and that mistrust of the motives of Southern states like Texas is the worst bigotry ever seen in history (though he will concede that if abortionists limit themselves to strip searches of a fetus that's totally cool). Alito will write a concurrence arguing against pandemic restrictions. Kavanaugh will write a concurrence arguing that the majority opinion is actually much more narrow than it appears to be and that he is a swell guy. Roberts will write a dissent mirroring Kavanaugh's concurrence. Sotomayer's dissent, joined by Kagan and Breyer will be a reprint of the 1619 Project. Breyer will write separately to wonder what would happen in a case where the minister sticks something in the underwear of the fetus.