The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Stephen Carter Writes About The Oral History of Justice Thurgood Marshall
"If I'd known I was going to live so long, I would've never given up smoking and drinking."
Stephen Carter published in the New York Times Magazine a remarkable story about his former boss, Justice Thurgood Marshall. Carter reveals that he recorded an oral history with Justice Marshall that remains restricted.
And during the last year of his life, the two of us spent a great deal of time together in the smaller upstairs chambers assigned to him upon his retirement, because he had asked me to serve as the interviewer for his official oral history for the Federal Judicial Center. Our conversations lasted countless hours but also all too few. The recordings remain sealed, but even outside the audio taping, we talked. Or, rather, the Judge talked; I listened and learned. . . .
The oral history remains sealed — an effort to comply with the Judge's wishes. But I think I can fairly say, without violating my confidentiality agreement, that no earth-shattering disclosures are locked away. When the recordings and transcripts are opened to researchers, the curious will find only more evidence of just how extraordinary a human being Thurgood Marshall was. . . .
One last pinprick: When, after his retirement, the Judge invited me to serve as interviewer for his official oral history, I called the chambers and asked why. "Because I like to live dangerously," he said. . . . .
We never completed the oral history. Although we strove mightily and wound up with more than 20 hours of tapes, we knew we were racing a clock neither of us dared mention. Yet even as age and illness stole the Judge's vitality, in our meetings he remained as cheery as ever. Whatever he might have shared with his intimates, each time I walked through the door of his office, he greeted me with the same twinkle in his eye. On the rare occasions when I ventured to ask after his health, he would turn the question into a joke: "If I'd known I was going to live so long, I would've never given up smoking and drinking."
But although he was tired and would occasionally grimace in obvious discomfort, he was, for the most part, the same peppy and optimistic man I remembered. It was as though he was determined through force of will to teach those around him even how to deal with impending death.
Our final sessions came in the fall of 1992. We had finished the material on his career before the Supreme Court and were starting on his life as a justice. We were supposed to resume the interviews in January 1993, the week before the inauguration of President Bill Clinton, where the Judge had promised to swear in Vice President Al Gore. Then a call from Marshall's chambers postponed our next meeting: He was a little under the weather.
For once the Judge had broken his word, because he didn't make the inauguration either. He died a few days later. Before his funeral, he lay in state in the Great Hall of the Supreme Court building, and we who served as law clerks over the years took turns standing watch at the coffin as the public filed past, mourning the passing of a giant.
The Supreme Court has never been the same.
There are so many wonderful stories and anecdotes. Take the time to read it.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Are we supposed to be surprised that someone wouldn't say anything extremely bad or embarrassing about themselves in a voluntary oral history meant to promote them?
You can just enjoy good stories sometimes; it's okay.
Yeah. A slightly OT version of the same point- everyone online is very offended by softball political interviews (especially of the other side's politicians).
But what people don't understand is there is actually a place in this world for softball interviews. Sometimes they elicit useful information because the person lets his or her guard down. And sometimes, as you say, they elicit stories, or anecdotes. And of course, people like to know their leaders as people- for instance, the public had a significant amount of interest in George W. Bush's twin daughters. People like to hear about politicians' pets. Etc.
Not every interaction has to be a knock down drag out interrogation.
I enjoyed the article more than any I've read in months. Carter is a great writer with an interesting subject.
Why would the extremely bad or embarrassing content relate solely to Justice Marshall?
"If I'd known I was going to live so long, I would've never given up smoking and drinking."
I wonder if that was an allusion to Mickey Mantle. Most of his male relatives didn't live past 50, so in his later years, he said something to the effect of, "If I'd known I'd live so long, I'd have took better care of myself."
I've heard that attributed to Mantle as well.
Maybe being a HOF Yankee instead of a miner helped with that.
"The recordings remain sealed"
I wonder what Prof. Volokh thinks about *that.*
"...an effort to comply with the Judge's wishes."
Access to oral history tapes and transcripts is always negotiated with the subject prior to conducting them. It's SOP. https://www.oralhistory.org/best-practices/
The man is personally responsible for the murder of millions of of black and brown babies -- for the day he is canceled!
By all accounts he never quite the philandering...