The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: July 6, 1835
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I rag on Josh sending posthumous birthday cards or condolence cards, but this death really was significant. Just because Taney like Marshall saw slavery as natural law doesn’t mean his jurisprudence was the same in other respects.
Obviously, Taney had a different judicial philosophy than Marshall, and one can't seriously deny that.
At the same time, because of the outrageousness of Taney's racist rhetoric in Dred Scott, there's a tendency to portray him as this absolute right wing revanchist, and he was nothing of the sort. The closest analogy might be Burger coming after Warren. Burger had a wildly different judicial philosophy, but he also was more interested in paring back Warren court precedents rather than overturning them wholesale, and Burger even voted to entrench and expand a few of them.
Taney was the same way towards Marshall court precedents.