The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Today in Supreme Court History: March 29, 1937
3/29/1937: West Coast Hotel v. Parrish decided.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Not decided — published. If you don’t know the difference then you are missing a very important fact about Supreme Court history.
I pointed this out last time around but it hasn’t been corrected. Josh just doesn’t care.
The target audience for the goods being peddled here asks: 'What does that have to do with owning the libs?'
The Official Report of the decision reads: "Argued December 16, 17, 1936
Decided March 29, 1937"
However anyone who digs into this case (Josh is holding himself out as someone who does this) knows that the Court actually decided the case at the conference of December 19, 1936, when Roberts voted in favor of the statute, creating a 5-4 majority which ended the Lochner era.
That's not what lawyers mean by "decided". The conference vote isn't final, and indeed, there are many stories of courts voting one way at a conference and then the vote shifting later.
Note that "decided" is the Court's own term of art. It refers to when a notice of the decision is published. Note as well that while usually this is the day the opinion is handed down, it doesn't have to be- Ex Parte Quirin, for instance, was decided before the Court issued opinions. But a case isn't "decided" just because of a vote in a conference.