The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
The Trump Administration's Uncooperative Environmental Federalism
The EPA has talked the talk of cooperative federalism, but it's not yet fully walking the walk.
The Trump Administration has spoken quite a bit about the need to curtail federal environmental regulation and facilitate greater state leadership in environmental policy. Yet while the Environmental Protection Agency has worked aggressively to scale back many environmental regulations, particularly those adopted by the Obama Administration, it has not done much to facilitate greater state leadership or to give states more flexibility to adopt locally appropriate environmental policies -- or so I argued in a presentation I made at the Hastings Law Journal symposium, "Revolution or Evolution: Administrative Law in the Age of Trump," last month at the UC Hastings College of Law.
I've turned my presentation into a short paper, "Uncooperative Environmental Federalism 2.0," and it's now available on SSRN. Here's the abstract:
Has the Trump Administration made good on its pledges to reinvigorate cooperative federalism and constrain environmental regulatory overreach by the federal government? Perhaps less than one would think. This paper, prepared for the Hastings Law Journal symposium, "Revolution of Evolution? Administrative Law in the Age of Trump," provides a critical assessment of the Trump Administration's approach to environmental federalism. Despite the Administration's embrace of "cooperative federalism" rhetoric, environmental policy reforms have not consistently embodied a principled approach to environmental federalism in which the state and federal governments are each encouraged to focus resources on areas of comparative advantage.
This paper will be published in the Hastings Law Journal symposium issue. As this is still a draft, comments are welcome.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't know if you are surprised by the fact that an EPA headed first by Scott Pruitt and then Andrew Wheeler seems uninterested in protecting the environment, and worries more about promoting fossil fuels than reducing pollution.
If so, you shouldn't be. It's been apparent from the start - from well before the start of the Trump Administration, actually, - that Republicans don't give a fig about the environment. It's time for you to take a whiff of that particular cup coffee.
I wonder what President from what party created the EPA.
I wonder which party began its life as the anti slavery party. Does it matter now?
The same party that now is trying to destroy it.
Do you really have nothing but this kind of lame bullshit to defend the current GOP's policies?
It's as much as an admission that I'm right.
Either it's because:
1. They don't want anyone (state or federal) protecting the environment, or
2. They're too lazy/disorganized/incompetent to follow through on what they say they want to do.
Those are not mutually exclusive.