Ranking law faculties by scholarly impact

Professor Gregory Sisk and several of his colleagues have just released their latest ranking of U.S. law faculties based upon the their scholarly impact. The study measures scholarly impact by looking at the mean and median citations to tenured faculty in law review articles over the period 2010-2014, using a methodology developed by the University of Chicago's Brian Leiter. It ranks the top 70 law schools or, as Sisk, et al., characterize it, the "top third."

Leiter posts the top 40 at his blog. The full paper (with the complete ranking) is available on SSRN.

One interesting thing about this study is that, at some schools, there is a substantial gulf between the measured scholarly impact of the tenured faculty and the U.S. News peer reputation score (which is supposed to measure the quality of the faculty)—to say nothing of the variance between the scholarly impact score and overall U.S. News rankings. For instance, my own institution (Case Western Reserve University School of Law) ranks 25 in this rating, which is substantially higher than either U.S. News measure.

This sort of ranking has some obvious limitations. Academic citations are but one potential measure of a school's scholarly impact, and scholarly impact is but one measure of a law school faculty. Nonetheless, this sort of ranking system provides some measure of which faculties (and which scholars) have had the greatest impact on legal scholarship in recent years.

UPDATE: I should also note that the George Mason University School of Law (my alma mater and the home of several VC contributors) is ranked 21, which is much higher than its U.S. News ranking.