A Different Claus(e)

The Fifth Amendment wears a Santa hat.

Austin Bragg | 12.20.2023 2:59 PM

HD Download

A little girl gets a holiday visit from Takings Clause.

Video Editor: Austin Bragg
Video Editor: Meredith Bragg
Video Editor: John Carter

NEXT: Jennifer Burns on Milton Friedman's Legacy

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

Chumby 1 year ago

The devil wears Prada diapers.

Log in to Reply
jasonfarrell 1 year ago

funny

Log in to Reply
Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf 1 year ago

I almost didn't recognize Takings, looked too skinny. Has he been on a diet?

Excellent skit.

Log in to Reply
TJJ2000 1 year ago

'just compensation' = a pocket constitution... lol...
'public use' = my brother (all too familiar).

Log in to Reply
Stuck in California 1 year ago

Log in to Reply
Stuck in California 1 year ago

Well, edit is still busted.

Anyway, I said "Great closed captioning" and pointed out the sad puppet noises

Log in to Reply
Naime Bond 1 year ago

The pocket Constitution does not come close to the just compensation requirement that mandates (among other things) “a full and perfect equivalent for the property taken...' Pretty easy case to win. But if you are going to whine like the puppet and believe the BS heard in the video, then you are going to lose the fight before it begins. On the flooding case it currently has 80 plaintiff's and is now active and will be argued before the Supreme Court - which took the case under certiorari (99% of which requests are rejected) - the video lies with it's 'tough luck' nonsense (Texas has waived it's immunity) making it sound as if citizens have no recourse.

Log in to Reply
1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf 1 year ago
  
  The Constitution hasn't been worth what it's written on since John Adams threw newspaper editors in jail for insulting him, just 7 years after the First Amendment was passed.
  
  Log in to Reply
2. JoeJoetheIdiotCircusBoy 1 year ago
  
  Bet you complained Alice in Wonderland wasn't an accurate representation of reality after you saw it too.
  
  Log in to Reply
3. LIBertrans 1 year ago
  
  Observe that ALL arguments to the effect that the Political State MUST NOW send men with guns to coerce or we're all gonna die base the claim on imaginary facts that will only materialize if certain presumptuous assumptions are not falsified. Here the assumption is that Long Dong, Palito, KKKavanaugh, Gorbasuch and Mutterkreuz Mom will take time off from enslaving and killing women (because TR and Herbert Hoover's "New Race") to see outcoes about the Texas horse ranch being inconvenienced. We'll be back to this story after customs libel, faith-based asset forfeiture and robbery with service pistols complaints are all laughed out of La Suprema. Stay tuned...
  
  Log in to Reply
  1. Ersatz 1 year ago
    
    was that a cry for help on your part?
    Here the assumption is that Long Dong, Palito, KKKavanaugh, Gorbasuch and Mutterkreuz Mom will take time off from enslaving and killing women
    you are pathetic...
    grow a vagina or man up!
    
    Log in to Reply
4. Agammamon 1 year ago
  
  >the video lies with it’s ‘tough luck’ nonsense (Texas has waived it’s immunity) making it sound as if citizens have no recourse.
  
  Tell that to Kelo
  
  Secondly, citizens have no recours *unless the government waives its self-granted immunity from lawsuit*.
  
  Log in to Reply
Fist of Etiquette 1 year ago

I find this video acceptable for my entertainment needs.

Log in to Reply
jameshatt007 1 year ago

As of my last knowledge update in January 2022, there were discussions and plans for high-speed rail projects in Florida, but no high-speed train was operational without subsidies at that time. Plans for high-speed rail development can evolve, and new projects may have been initiated or completed since then.

If there is a specific company and high-speed train service you are referring to, and it has started operations without subsidies, I recommend checking the latest news sources, the official website of the company, or other reputable news outlets for the most up-to-date information. News articles, press releases, or official statements from the company would provide details about the current status of the high-speed train service and its financial model.

Keep in mind that the status of infrastructure projects can change, and developments may have occurred after my last update in January 2022...

Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

A Different Claus(e)

The Fifth Amendment wears a Santa hat.

Latest

Yanking the Funds

15 Years of Super PACs

Alaska Poised To Beg for Relief From Crippling Federal Shipping Restrictions

Brickbat: Lawn Sign Litigation

Texas A&M's Drag Ban Shows the Threat to Campus Free Speech Is Bipartisan

Login Form