Chris Rufo's Battle To 'Stop Woke'
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Chris Rufo, and Zach Weissmueller's about Rufo's "counterrevolution" against wokeness
Few activists ever affect political discourse and public policy to the degree that Chris Rufo has in the span of just a few years.
Rufo, the 38-year-old writer and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, received a personal note from President Trump after Rufo's appearance on Fox motivated the former president to sign an executive order banning the federal government or its contractors from conducting certain "divisive" diversity trainings—an action later reversed by President Biden. He stood beside Florida governor Ron DeSantis as he announced the "Stop WOKE Act," on which Rufo has consulted. He's advised state lawmakers around the country on k-12 and higher education bills. And after the Walt Disney Company publicly opposed one of DeSantis' education bills, Rufo published leaked videos of internal meetings in which one executive producer discussed her "not-at-all secret gay agenda" and a production coordinator referenced a tracking tool meant to boost the representation of trans and "gender non-conforming" characters. Boycotts of Disney ensued, and DeSantis eventually revoked the company's special governance district.
Reason's Nick Gillespie and Zach Weissmueller discuss with Rufo his war on "woke," what further policy changes he seeks, and what libertarians should think about his objectives and tactics in the livestream embedded above.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
With the dildo from ‘Seven’.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (ks-07) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
Kammie can do that.
ha ha ha....the point is CRA act sections on private sector were anti-liberty. Other than govt not discriminating or passing laws forcing one to discriminate, there is no reason for the govt to get involved...wasn't needed in 64 and not needed now
open inquiry in higher ed for real departments/fields of study like physics, chemistry, engineering, biochemistry, medicine..but seriously all of social science should be dropped..total waste of time and is not a serious fields of study.
make the colleges backtop 50% of all federal loans. Tuition will drop quite a bit and all those bolshie depts will be eliminated and the DIE cultists will go away
There are two aspects of the "woke" issue that I think should be highlighted. First, being woke is not in and of itself a problem for most of us, even so-called "conservatives." It is only when the woke mob seeks to impose their views on all of society that it becomes a problem. It is not enough to point out that the push-back comes from people who don't hold the most appetizing counter-positions (like fascists) and the resulting culture wars leave a lot of innocent victims in its wake who are not fascists of any kind. And second, the culture wars have opened the doors to the fascists who use the success of the woke mob as an excuse to impose fascist responses on all of society with the support of "conservatives" who would not have supported such a response until they were marginalized by the woke mobsters. After all, "Roe v. Wade" was tolerated by most "conservatives" for several decades as a reasonable compromise between total abortion bans and abortion on demand paid for by public taxes.
The 'woke' are the fascists.
Correct.
Woke = postmodern nazism
After all, “Roe v. Wade” was tolerated by most “conservatives” for several decades as a reasonable compromise between total abortion bans and abortion on demand paid for by public taxes.
You're joking, right? For the last fifty years, pro-life and vehement opposition to Roe was the default conservative position. And opposition to state financed abortion wasn't unique to conservatives. Until the last two or three years or so, that was a position agreed with by most Democrats. Your position is roughly akin to suggesting that jailing all progressives is a reasonable compromise between letting them take over and throwing them out of helicopters.
They're making concern trolls a lot more lazy and careless these days. In 2008, they'd have known enough to at least not powerlevel themselves by invoking Godwin straight away.
Back when the word "libertarian" was thoughtcrime on the UT campus, pro-nuclear activists infiltrated YAF. The official Young Americans for Fascism position is that true conservatives all Believe and Agree that letting uppity women imagine they have individual rights is a crime on a level with race suicide, and only atheistic libertarian scum would ever dream of allowing such an outrage. It's in their old newsletters. Pretending to like Matt is their way of making voters hate Reason and the LP.
First, being woke is not in and of itself a problem for most of us, even so-called “conservatives.”
Speak for yourself. Call me conservative, but I have a problem with people agreeing with or identifying as meaningless gibberish. I'm hardly in the minority on that as well.
Listening to endless hours of James Lindsay read and decipher this shit has converted me to his premise that this stuff is not meaningless word salad. It means stuff. And none of it is good.
There are two aspects of the “woke” issue that I think should be highlighted. First, being woke is not in and of itself a problem for most of us, even so-called “conservatives.”
depends what aspect of 'woke' we're talking about. If a full grown adult wants to put on a wig, paint lipstick all over his face and call himself Susan, and then argue on the internet that the women's changing room should provide him full access... that's not so much a problem.
But we have to explore what the definition of "woke" is, or the origins of the term.
The term "woke" is a slang term (invented by the 'woke' and now rejected once it became wielded against them) is the idea that you have become "awakened" to all of the systemic oppression within society. You have achieved special vision and 'sight' to be able to see and detect all the areas of power and oppressions within the systems that govern public life. It is, at its core a incredibly divisive way of looking at the world with a specific goal of destabilizing society for the ultimate purpose of destroying the nuclear family, global capitalism which in turn will usher in a more equitable society based on Marxian principles.
So yeah, being woke is a problem.
This goes into a thing I wish Reason would do more of.
Something can be a problem, it can even be a huge problem, without government action being appropriate. I agree with you on Wokism, and will make explicit the fact that government is downstream from culture.
I wish Reason would do more reporting on people trying to do cultural change. Showing non-governmental actors attempting to affect good change is essential to a libertarian society, and to convince people that a libertarian society is possible.
I think Reason is just poor though, and it's expensive to send reporters out across the US to report on what the little men and women of our country are doing to aid their communities.
No, Reason is an evil totalitarian leftist publication.
Oh, s'up Nardz? Haven't seen you for a while. We were worried.
nice to see you.
Make sure you are checking out Reason magazine, not just the blog. The magazine, not the blog, is the main show, although some people who hang out here on the website don’t seem to be aware of it.
Is the magazine not an evil totalitarian leftist publication?
(Seems kind of unlikely...)
My first copy of Reason had Human Body Glue on the cover. National Socialist Review costs ten times as much, so many of its wannabee subscribers come here instead to sabotage the cheaper, better competitor. The Kleptocracy does the same thing with elections. (https://bit.ly/3g3cwzB)
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B07NKWL91J/reasonmagazinea-20/
https://www.nationalreview.com/subscribe-13/
Wow, you just flatout lied about the prices. As long as you continue to lie, those "wannabe subscribers" will call you out. You should repent.
"I wish Reason would do more reporting on people trying to do cultural change. "
Well here is the problem, BUCS. This starts to take us into Thick Libertarianism. That is the notion that proper libertarianism doesn't stop at violations of NAP but should include celebrating the breaking of norms that these TLs see as overly constraining. Prostitution shouldn't merely be decriminalized, but normalized. It is not enough to leave Gays alone, you must treat them like you treat anyone else.
This is where you see the nonsensical fixation that so many Thick Libertarians have with the Mises Party. To them, if you aren't shaming bigots (rather than advocating against forced bigotry) you haven't done enough to push the libertarian ethos.
Thick Libertarianism
You're a thick libertarian.
That's what she said.
Is Thick Libertarianism the same as Libertarianism The Chicago Way? 🙂
I'm just waiting for someone from The Mises Caucus to cite line-and-verse from Ludwig Von Mises' work that says Edgelord Shitposters can and will advance the cause of political and economic freedom better than others, and specify how they will do it.
Line-and-verse or STFU and GTFO!
That'll happen right after they point to where Lootveeg explains that the 1929 Crash, the banking panics of 1930-33 and Germany and AUSTRIA's 1931 crash, panic, collapse and conversion to Nazi Anschluss economics had nothing to do with prohibition laws. None of these soi-disant "right-wing" fascists, nazis and girl-bulliers are eager to talk about how Republicans and Crashes go together like Cause and Effect.
You do know that regulation was the cause of those crashes and recessions, don't you? Look at what Biden's done for one. Republicans had nothing to do with them.
I think Reason is just poor though, and it’s expensive to send reporters out across the US to report on what the little men and women of our country are doing to aid their communities.
But there's money in the budget for a single vendor running a farmer's market in a third (or lower) tier backwater losing their space because a public roadway was widened.
Isn't Woke just a new name for Antifa? Now that the LP is taken over by a smaller, harder, angrier lot of girl-bullying anarcho-fascists compliant with the larger Grabber Of Pussy party, Antifa has suddenly acquired other connotations. Anschluss matters!
Do you even know what you’re talking about? We didn’t invent the term “woke”, they did. Antifa embraces it too.
Don't fabricate our viewpoints.
It is, at its core a incredibly divisive way of looking at the world …
It’s also insufferably arrogant
You know who else was incredibly divisive and insufferably arrogant?
Wanda Sykes?
So strange that Libertarians are so hung up on "woke" which is basically people with no power saying dumb things on the internet or people on both sides of the political aisle trying to cancel each other on social media.
Libertarians used to be concerned with actual laws where big government harms people's lives and freedoms like forcing 10 year old girls to flee their state so they are not forced to have their rapist's baby.
No power? It’s become the driving ethos of every national and international institution in the west. Public and Private. Military and Civilian. Everything from the UN to the CIA to M&Ms to have gone woke.
Seeing as it’s the intellectual antithesis of individual freedom and free markets, I think it deserves a blip on the libertarian radar.
So how does "it" coercion differ from Grabbers Of Pussy? As an outsider, I have trouble telling "woke", "antifa" and "come-mierda" apart. They all sound like non-republican totalitarian looters as described by republican totalitarian looters. The appeal to JFK's Death on the Cross as a stalking horse for adding totalitarianism is amusing, coming from the party that sued to have the Texas vote nullified so Nixon could be declared the 1960 winner.
So how does “it” coercion differ from Grabbers Of Pussy?
That’s easy, “it” is a big driving force of the Democratic Party, the other is your name-calling that derives from an act that’s legal as long as “they let you do it”.
As an outsider, I have trouble telling “woke”, “antifa” and “come-mierda” apart. They all sound like non-republican totalitarian looters as described by republican totalitarian looters.
Then you haven’t done your research. Get at it, the task really isn’t all that difficult.
The appeal to JFK’s Death on the Cross as a stalking horse for adding totalitarianism is amusing, coming from the party that sued to have the Texas vote nullified so Nixon could be declared the 1960 winner.
Irregularities in an election warrant an investigation. That’s actually an act against totalitarianism, not for it. It was true then, remains true now.
I noticed that too... The LP is suddenly packed with the same people we knew as communist anarchists, SDS, Soviet sympathizers, speed freaks, vice squad impostors and prohibition agents back when the thing started. Observe how they butchered the original platform into a Dem/GOP quilt with holes in it. (https://bit.ly/3PPpvBW)
Ohio has stated that state travel was completely unneeded. Why do libertarians have to worry about that?
The two are the same thing. If you're doing the woke stuff then *part of being woke* is trying to force it onto other people. Its literally the 'warrior' part of 'social justice warrior'.
First, being woke is not in and of itself a problem for most of us, even so-called “conservatives.” It is only when the woke mob seeks to impose their views on all of society that it becomes a problem.
This greatly understates the problem since the woke believe things only because they help impose their views on "all of society".
For example consider The 1619 Project. The developed their belief that the American Revolution was fought to protect slavery because it transforms the American founding from an important step in the long path toward freedom (yea!) to a war to protect slavery (boo!). They desire this view because it helps undermine the liberal framework established at America's founding (and improved since) which the woke would like to replace with racialist authoritarianism.
We know this view could not have been arrived at in good faith because there is literally no supporting evidence for it (beyond their own assertions). It's an example of how leftists arrive at their assertions and belief set entirely by asking themselves "if we could invent a reality to support our debate position what is the best response we could devise". The only purpose of this process is driving change.
"Sure, global megacorps, the mass media, and government bureaucracies from the top on down to the local school boards are implementing wokism as the new civic religion, but that doesn't mean it's a problem, guys! Stop resisting about these unimportant culture war issues, the culture war is pointless anyway!"
this was basically the attitude the country took as a whole when it swallowed all of academia whole. "Its just college kids, doing college kid stuff, who cares"
Now those kids all have degrees in victim studies and a taste for marxism, and they are on all the HR/corporate boards with their harvard degrees. And they are shoving it down everyone's throats wholesale. And the progs will still go with the same line "oh its just silly culture war stuff, just stop being rude to trans people, let the drag queens slay, its not hurting anyone!"
We as a society have let this abomination go on far too long, and it might have a bit too much momentum now
The whole point of woke is to impose it on everyone. So yes, it’s intrinsically problematic.
Marxists always call people who actively resist their agenda "facists". It's Marcusian reductivism at its most distilled.
who are the fascists y ou are talking about?
If y ou just mean the typical congressman who is all for a merging of state and private interests, then sure, there are fascists and thney have all the power now.
But I dont think that's who y ou are talking about. Who exactly are these "fascists" out there pushing back against the woke agenda?
The difference between a heavily mixed, quasi-totalitarian controlled economy and a fascist state is that the fascist state is controlled by people who pretend to believe Jesus ever existed, and pretend to advocate some of what would be Christian teachings, BUT NOT give away all you own and follow me as a barefoot preacher. Hitler speeches were full of appeals to God, Jesus, Providence and Faith. Franco was God's Own Caudillo and Mussolini legislated religious indoctrination in government schools. Other than that they and non-christian dictatorships like Imperial Japan are all about equally bloody and murderous.
"Tolerated" LOL
'After all, “Roe v. Wade” was tolerated by most “conservatives” for several decades as a reasonable compromise between total abortion bans and abortion on demand paid for by public taxes.' Wrong, it was viewed as what it was, judicial activism in which the court went beyond the intent of the case in their decision. It mandated a federal law overriding all state's laws. Where your assertion comes from escapes me.
Where did the DIE movement all of a sudden show up in all levels of Govt, Corporate HR departments and Schools? these things just don't occur..they are planned and funded. By who? Many guesses like the usual cultural marxist suspects who have been pushing this for decades due to "old world grudges" but to just show up everywhere...very very suspicious.
It is time to unmask the bolshies who have been hiding in academia, media, entertainment, big tech and govt and let the chips fall where they may. Liberty demands the complete rejection of wokeness
Fifth Column National Socialist Trojan identified... Ready Photon Torpedoes. Deploy Moot Lewser...
Do it, boy!
OT: “Congress’s decision to abdicate its appropriations power under the Constitution, i.e., to cede its power of the purse to the Bureau, violates the Constitution’s structural separation of powers,” the judges wrote."
- 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
God, I hope this becomes a "Super-Precedent" and is applied early and often to our Imperial Presidency.
sounds like a direct route to a visit from Flowers By Irene and early disappearance.
Ending Disney’s special government district was not just vengeance for taking a political stand. The existence of the district put its police officers on Disney’s payroll — thus enabling Disney to silently dismiss and hide any cases in which child abusers got jobs at the park and used them to get access to children. The people deserve transparency whenever cases like that occur — and any business that serves children is going to attract those people.
So, sockpuppet, how did you uncover this factual information (thus enabling + is going to...) you mention?
That's easy, the news. Go read it, kid.
Why the quotes around 'stop woke'? Is that not what he's trying to do?
I could see "stop 'woke'" - where you're saying 'woke' isn't what he says it is. I could see "'stop' woke" - where you're saying he's not really trying to stop anything, just pretending to.
Maybe it’s an actual quote of words that he said.
"Stop Woke" is a strange turn of phrase. So they are being very clear that "stop woke" is a phrase that Rufo uses. It is also an allusion to the "stop woke act".
It is not a strange turn of phrase - not to the woke or those who oppose' them.
This blog post cannot exist. I have it on good word that Reason backs the progressive gender agenda.
Oh look, Mike is here to turn all discussion into the standard flame wars. But really, people, he is just a reasonable guy interested in discussion. Like when he tries to derail threads about GMOs by bringing up vaccination.
https://reason.com/2022/01/07/mandatory-gmo-disclosure-doesnt-sway-shopping-habits-but-will-drive-up-costs/?comments=true#comment-9293589
Oh look, someone doing the exact thing they dislike. And doing so by co-opting a pathetic schtick created by someone else.
Whatever. I had people making comments yesterday that Reason, and I, are backing the progressive gender agenda. I can link to them if you like.
The exact technical term is "stalking horse." The idea is to increase coercion by The Political State, meaning the Grabber Of Pussy and jailer of hippies political state. WHY more coercion is needed is beside the point, and the burden of proving that men with guns need not be sent to threaten additional people on added non-violent pretexts is falls on they who do not want loaded guns pointed at them. Hitler dared all of Europe to reduce its armaments to the same level as defeated Germany. Same basic ploy.
This comment cannot exist. I have in on good authority Mike Larsen hates mean spiritedness, Americans bickering, and comments without substance.
ugh rufo is so cringeeeeee
But he’s right. Do you object to that?
Reason's Nick Gillespie and Zach Weissmueller discuss with Rufo his war on "woke," what further policy changes he seeks, and what libertarians should think about his objectives and tactics in the livestream embedded above.
Libertarians should probably 147% on board because Wokeness is literally antithetical to libertarianism.
The fascist Boy Wonder reminds me of YAF junior tools urging that women be stripped of individuality and forced to reproduce as of the onset of pregnancy. The challenge update: "c'mon, Zack, are you against God's Own Prohibitionist Comstock laws we are building on in the Republican eugenic war against 'Murrican race suicide? Yes or no?" Just how many words are in the law forcing rednecks to serve blacks (or Puerto Ricans) at Walgreens? Why is that not enough? Does WOKE mean the same thing as Hitler-opposing German Social Democrat?