Chile's Proposed Left-Wing Constitution Could Spell Chaos
The 54,000-word draft document is a feeding frenzy of political interests looking to codify special rights and privileges.
HD DownloadIn the fall of 2019, a subway fare hike in Santiago, Chile, set off some of the most violent protests in Latin America's recent history. In what the media dubbed a "social outburst," rioters destroyed churches, metro stations, and toll booths.
The protests culminated in the election of the 36-year-old leftist President Gabriel Boric, who has pledged to nationalize Chile's private pension system, raise taxes, and create a more green economy.
Even before that, protesters went after the Chilean Constitution itself. In a nationwide referendum held in October 2020, 78 percent of voters opted to replace it.
On September 4, they'll return to the polls to approve or reject a new draft constitution, which, if passed, could bring a tragic and decisive end to Chile's so-called economic miracle that turned the country into a model for how free market policies can benefit the poor.
The current constitution was adopted in 1980, when Chile was still one of Latin America's poorest countries. Over the next 40 years, the government tamed inflation, privatized industries, and slashed tariffs and red tape, which caused its GDP to soar and poverty to plummet.
Extreme poverty fell drastically, and staples of modern living like TVs, refrigerators, and washing machines became a feature in almost every home.
Here's the problem: Chile's 1980 constitution was adopted during the military dictatorship led by General Augusto Pinochet, who took control of the country in a murderous 1973 coup. Because of this, some say the constitution is illegitimate.
The best way to address problems with the document is not to scrap it altogether, but to revise it, which is exactly what's happened: since the return to democratic governance in 1989, the Chilean Constitution has been amended 140 times.
Rewriting the constitution, as an elected body has been doing over the past year, has predictably created a feeding frenzy for political interests looking to codify special rights and privileges into the nation's most important legal document.
The Economist described the country's draft constitution as "a fiscally irresponsible left-wing wish list." It bans "job insecurity," expands welfare programs, mandates gender parity in all public institutions, and grants "social" rights that would expand the role of the state in health care, education, and housing.
The document permits property and asset seizures by legislative decree without compensation for rightful property owners. It constrains the mining industry, eliminates school choice, and would disband the Senate, making it easier for the executive branch to circumvent the opposition and enact its agenda.
These provisions are spelled out in almost 54,000 words—which is about seven times as long as the U.S. Constitution.
Unlike that document, which has been in place since 1788, the Chilean draft constitution focuses on expanding state power rather than constraining it.
Chile's draft constitution is even longer than Venezuela's, which was redrafted by Hugo Chávez' administration during his first year in office and set the stage for the country's socialist revolution, descent into dictatorship, and ensuing economic collapse.
Venezuela has had 26 constitutions in a little over two centuries. In general, the practice of scrapping and rewriting constitutions helps to explain Latin America's relentless political turmoil.
A constitution provides legal stability and predictability—like a computer operating system. Tampering with any foundational code creates security holes that are easily exploited by political opportunists looking to amplify their own power and overturn the established order.
Even if Chileans reject the new constitution—and, thankfully, polls indicate that they probably will—Boric can choose to start the process again with the election of yet another constitutional assembly to draft yet another version.
That could bring years of chaos, economic stagnation, and legal uncertainty. Now that Latin America's free market experiment and "economic miracle" may be coming to an end, hopefully, the rest of the world can learn from the experience of Chile once again: Beware leftist pipe dreams.
Produced by Daniel Raisbeck and Alyssa Varas: Edited by Danielle Thompson
Photo Credits: DARDE/SIPA/Newscom; World History Archive/Newscom; Album / Oronoz/Newscom; Elyxandro Cegarra/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Matias Basualdo/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Felipe Figueroa / SOPA Images/Si/Newscom; Lucas Aguayo Araos/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Claudio Abarca Sandoval/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Alberto Valdes/EFE/Newscom; Jose Miguel Rojas/SIPA/SIPA/Newscom; Jose Miguel Rojas/SIPA/SIPA/Newscom; DPST/Newscom; Alberto Valdes/EFE/Newscom; Peter Langer / DanitaDelimont.com / "Danita Delimont Photography"/Newscom; A3116 Tim Brakemeier / Deutsch Presse Agentur/Newscom; Ben185/Newscom; Lucas Aguayo Araos / SOPA Images/Newscom; Alberto Valdes/EFE/Newscom; Jon G. Fuller / VWPics/Newscom; Matias Basualdo/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Trevor Collens / Photoshot Trevor Collens/Photoshot/Newscom; HUMBERTO MATHEUS/EFE/Newscom; HUMBERTO MATHEUS/EFE/Newscom; Jorge Villegas / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom; Matias Basualdo/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Yadid Levy/robertharding/Newscom; akg-images/Newscom; Pablo Rojas Madariaga/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Matias Basualdo/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Felipe Figueroa/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Felipe Figueroa / SOPA Images/Si/Newscom; Vanessa Rubilar/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; B1mbo, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile, CC BY-SA 3.0 CL, via Wikimedia Commons; Usuario Patricio Mecklenburg Díaz (Metronick), CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons; .:GIO::IAB:., CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
Music Credits: "Intrepid" by Brianna Tam via Artlist; "Odd Numbers" by Curtis Cole via Artlist; "Ripples" by Tamuz Dekel via Artlist; "Circularity" Brianna Tam via Artlist
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I dunno guys. Maybe I'm becoming desensitized to this stuff. Sure, 20 years ago had I read this article, I'd have thought "OMG, what terrible Marxist policies are coming to Chile!"
Now reading it I feel like I scrolled through Biden's campaign website. Remember, the head of the DNC said this very stuff was "the future of the Democratic party".
Same. I'd be more concerned for other countries if marxists weren't doing the same shit here.
Chile's going to address the gender pay gap, build a green economy, and *eek!* they're 'looking to codify special rights and privileges into the nation's most important legal document'.
None of this sounds familiar? None of this sounds like what a good chunk of the Reason staff voted for?
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I have not ever thought like it would even achievable however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail. Look extra details
going this article… https://incomebuzz7.blogspot.com/
Don’t fall for wingnut propaganda: there are no Marxists in the USA.
Only normal people and right-wing Nazis.
Ya gotta stay in character, EC. Study OBL.
Is it time yet to give up on the idea of "natural conservatives"?
Or must we repeat the lie until it's the truth?
Keep in mind what was said way down in the article: that this proposal was running behind in the polls.
Even if it were ahead, it must get 2/3 of the votes to be enacted. This is an important detail that the article omitted.
They say history rhymes. Is Chile heading for "Pinochet 2: The Sequel"?
In the fall of 2019, a subway fare hike in Santiago, Chile, set off some of the most violent protests in Latin America's recent history.
Same thing happened in Boston.
In line with the above about Reason voting for Biden, I feel compelled to question whether this "a subway fare hike" is akin to the "'Beloved' backlash got Youngkin elected." narrative. Where there's actually a shit-ton of cultural and even policy stuff that's bubbling underneath and even a couple of flash points that could be pointed to but Reason's going with trains.
I will say, it's interesting that we've gotten frequent updates on everything Orban, but Chile voting on a new Constitution being enacted by Presidential referendum didn't come up until a week before the vote.
A decade or so ago my oldest did a semester abroad thing and she wanted South America because she was fluent in Spanish. I’d been in South America to several places on business so I helped her pick a place and we chose Chile.
Great choice. Stable, safe, and the entire friggin country could be in a post card.
Breaks my heart to see that Marxist pricks are going to turn it into Venezuela. I fail to understand how Marxism/Communism still survives as a viable system, since everyone who has had to live under it since forever has tried to run away.
Because left wingers legislate on feelings and "morals" and don't believe in Einstein's maxim: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of crazy.
Not only that. They lie about both historical and currently ongoing horrors caused by leftist doctrines. They see to it that if a "journalist" lies to cover up the murder of millions, he can get a Pulitzer Prize - and keep it even 80 years after the lies are exposed. They take over school systems to teach false history, inverted economics, muddled language, and exalt feelings over emotion.
You can't learn from experience when you deny the experience.
Perhaps they have the equivalent of TDS-addled assholes who care more about personality than policies, TDS-addled asshole?
Perhaps they, like you, in the POTUS 2020 election, chose to reject someone who had reduced regulation, cut taxes and made very 'freedom' biased appointments since they, like you. were too stupid to focus on results?
They say a fanatic is someone who cannot change his mind and refuses to change the subject.
Go take a vacation or something. You are becoming unhinged.
I'm looking forward to finally having a socialist miracle that sticks!
So's every commie shit everywhere and always. They took 75 years to ruin the countries which made up the USSR, and the disaster the shitbags left is still not worth a ruble.
My GF grew up in Chile and remembers how beautiful the country was before Allende, how completely horrible it was under his rule, and then the military coup that at first was welcomed and then later despised.
It breaks her heart that now the country is volunteering to destroy what was built up post-Pinochet.
Post-WWI and WWII many Europeans, including Italian, German, French moved to Chile and imported their entrepreneurship, drive, and money to improve the country.
As she tells it, it has descended into thievery, envy, and a wish to get something for nothing. She left in the early '00s and legally emigrated to the US. She wanted better for her daughter.
Is the US better for thievery, envy and the wish to get something for nothing better (than Chile)?
Glad to hear it. Chile must really be AWFUL.
Sarc? Stupid? Lefty shit?
Vladimir's Moravian Restaurant may still be in Inverness (western Marin County, CA), but years ago, when he was running it, you could easily get the story of his skiing out of commie horror which was Eastern Europe.
A lot of Marinites were not happy hearing about that.
America used to be the land of the free, now it's just the land of free stuff.
Yeah, because left-wing dictatorships have worked so well in, um, er. hang on a moment, it's on the tip of my tongue, no, wait...
As I recall, you preferred FDR over Trump; did you have a change of heart?
Nope.
So you still see FDR as preferable to Trump?
Eat shit and die, asshole.
But what about Cuba's world leading health care?
Apparently during Stalin's time (and after), the ice cream in Moscow was exceptionally good - because he loved ice cream. The communists can always find something to do right - at the expense of overall economic efficiency.
What's the reason for 78% of people voting to dissolve the old government? I think we can easily argue that it's imprudent for them to get rid of their old constitution (though I don't know what's in it, so I'd have to hear the thinking), but that's almost 4/5ths of voters and so this actually does feel like a pretty legitimate democratic process. Though, once again I don't know the amendment process for Chile.
I'd like to be optimistic and think there aren't 78% socialists in Chile - there may be something wrong with the Pinochet constitution.
Though I'm surprised that Chilen socialists think they need an amendment to do the stuff they want. Why not just keep the existing constitution and ignore it like stable democracies up North do?
"In what the media dubbed a 'social outburst,'"
The U. S. media should file this away for use in future riots, since "mostly peaceful protests" may not fool people anymore.
But Socialism has only always failed because they didn't get it right. This time, however...
Every constitutional convention is a conspiracy.
Always have been, always will be.
Yes, of course, the US Constitution in particular.
Did you have a point there?
Happen to be reading a horrible book right now by an author who teaches at the London School of Econ, wherein he claims all trade debt must be monetized, so there never was "barter".
My point is simple: If you re-define words to suit your argument, a mouse can be an elephant.
Looks like you might be doing that.
Looks like Ezra MacVie is incapable of answering simple questions, so the default presumption is: "TDS-addled lefty pile of shit"
Care to suggest otherwise, Ezra?
A constitution provides legal stability and predictability—like a computer operating system. Tampering with any foundational code creates security holes that are easily exploited by political opportunists looking to amplify their own power and overturn the established order.
This sounds Burkean but is really just constipated. The purpose of a constitution is to describe (explicitly if written and Pythonesque if unwritten) how the consent of the governed will work. Stability is not the purpose. That is just what happens if the governed never change their terms of consent. And it ain't even a preference if 'stability' is viewed more highly than 'consent of the governed'.
It is rather obvious that the governed themselves have 100% turnover every generation - and unless explicitly stated in a constitution (which has never happened) there is no reason to assume that each generation will not have the full right to determine the terms of their own governance.
Nor are amendments a way to really fundamentally change things. The 13th amendment did not take slavery out of the Constitution institutionally. It merely prohibited it going forward absent a court determination. Likewise - states are no longer the sole intermediary institutions of governance but you can't amend the Constitution to include different intermediaries (eg munis or school districts or counties or voluntary associations or corporations). Likewise - without an explicit drop-dead date, federal debt is perpetual and thus a tyrannical imposition on people who never agreed to pay that debt nor received any benefits from incurring it.
Likewise - without an explicit drop-dead date, federal debt is perpetual and thus a tyrannical imposition on people who never agreed to pay that debt nor received any benefits from incurring it.
That's not axiomatically true. If the debt finances infrastructure or other capital investment from which substantial long-term benefits are realised, and further, that benefit can be more efficiently used in additional investment rather than in paying down the debt, then there's no tyrannical imposition. How often that happens in practice is, of course, another matter.
You also are full of shit; such never happens. If it did, both communism and Keynesianism might be true.
Planned economies never work, regardless of your BFF with FDR.
Fuck off and die.
Hey, you fascist cunt, only an idiot thinks that this can never happen. The flaws with communism are many but the idea that a government investment cannot ever generate a return higher than its cost of funds isn't one of them. It's ignorant dogmatic thinking - to the extent it can be called "thinking" at all.
And that doesn't make a planned economy either. I agree that planned economies don't work (they may do on very small scales, e.g., fewer than 120 people but they assuredly don't scale up) but financing an infrastructure project or the occasional capital investment does not remotely constitute a planned economy. But in your deluded state you seem to think that anything involving government is left-wing unless Trump does it, in which case you would cheerfully put in a bulk order of KY jelly from Amazon.
JFree again makes bullshit claims:
"Stability is not the purpose. That is just what happens if the governed never change their terms of consent."
You are full of shit, lefty scumbag.
Stability is *exactly*b the intent of a constitution; to allow a population to act and plan under a rule of law alterable only under conditions which are hard to effect.
A constitution is intended to establish an enduring definition of the governance of a nation; regardless of your idiocy, it is not equivalent to the changing definition of "jaywalking" depending on the street markings.
You really ought to STFU; you prove yourself to be an ignorant asshole most every time you post here.
Even Thomas Jefferson said the Constitution should be revisited every 20 years or so. I shudder to think what we would end up with now though.
I am more optimistic than those who want to hang on for dear life to the 'that's expired' by a vague fear that we are not worthy of exercising our natural right of self-governance.
It's why I like the idea of sortition. Maybe it doesn't completely replace elections. Maybe it is the basis for one branch of govt beyond the three we currently structure around. But any body selected by sortition is very well suited to actively restraining other bodies - because it knows it will soon be purely subject to those bodies.
There are so many structural problems that we are living with - that we know can never be amended - simply because we fear an Article 5 rewrite. A House that is no longer Representative because it merely perpetuates the Rule of the 435. Elections that no longer are anything but a way for parties to perpetuate their own power and for incumbents to select their constituents. No ability to hold agencies/ministers/bureaucrats accountable because an elected legislature doesn't oversee and the executive can't manage.
If it turns out that we truly no longer have the ability to agree to disagree. That we are no longer American before we are DeRp. Well then at least an Article5 will demonstrate that and we can figure out how to dissolve a non-workable union rather than simpy revert to the bleating shitheads who prattle on about secession/civilwar/etc.
To be fair, that was only in his private correspondence. He floated the idea to James Madison, who wrote back, "I get what you're saying, but you need to encourage stability, and who would think about entering into a contract when there's only a year or two left on the current constitution?"
It wasn't a very useful notion from Jefferson, nor one that most people at the time would have tolerated.
It wasn't a very useful notion from Jefferson, nor one that most people at the time would have tolerated.
It's also not a very fully fleshed out notion to decide merit on. Opportunity is not ability and he could've just been saying that every state votes in a CC every 20 yrs. on the bills up for ratification. It's not clear that at any point in it's almost century of history, the ERA would've been ratified even if votes on paper were collected every 20, 10, or even 5 yrs.
Hell, depending on where the 20 yrs. fell, it may've hastened the demise of the 18A. Hard to say the implications of Jefferson's recommendation without more clear delineation of the 'how'.
Sounds an awful lot like California-if they just added the absolute right to free unlimited abortion and gender affirming surgeries to their constitution.
Coincidentally, Chile is the worlds largest producer of Lithium which is needed for EVs and many other types of batteries. If they nationalize that, will Biden install a new Pinochet or Shah-like figure like what happened in Iran in 1953?
If I were going to write a globalist conspiracy 'long con' into a work of modern/historical/military fiction, that sounds like an exceedingly realistic candidate.
Strange that none of the lefty shits here have replied other than SRG to confirm his preference for the tin-pot-dictator wannabe over Trump, and thereby prove s/he's a steaming pile of lefty shit.
Congrats, SRG; eat shit and die.
Fuck off you fascist cunt. I'm not a lefty. And unlike you I'm not a moron either.
And after it inevitably fails and the country collapses into economic ruin and the ringleaders flee to Columbia, Leftists will still say that "true socialism" has never been tried anywhere.
And also that we should let the poor, suffering souls in and help care for them.
Or a version of, "the operation was successful but the patient died".
Or they'll try the Chavez/Scooby-doo excuse, "it would have worked if it hadn't been for you pesky Americans".
(Though the excuse that a country had major problems owing to US interference isn't necessarily incorrect in a number of places, of course.)
I wonder whether in such places the left-wing adheres to a quite false law of conservation of wealth, such that they only recognise the existence of wealth not the capacity to generate it, so they focus on redistribution of existing wealth rather than looking at ways to increase wealth generation. The world as zero-sum isn't an idea unique to the left, though.
As soon as Atlas Shrugged was competently translated into Portuguese, Brazil's... politicians published a book-length constitution to nullify THAT. But the word count was not all that different from the Vargas-era constitutions, when Mussolini was Duce, Hitler was holy and Franco was caudillo "by the grace of our Lord God". Le plus ça change...
Everyone needs to read this--
Got that? Tamed inflation, privatized, killed tariffs and bureacracy, and Chile became rich and far freer.
So, what's the problem?
And what was the issue with pinochet?
Well, 'some say' it's that he was killing them.
And he was. Because they were trying to DESTROY Chile.
What happened AFTER he killed them? Chile improved massively.
Think about that.
If you diaempower and kill the people trying to destroy your country, your country gets better.
For doing this, Pinochet gets called a 'dictator'. By who you ask?
The people we are circumspectly referring to by the euphemism 'some say'. Leftist human garbage.
Now they are trying to destroy Chile again. I hope the next Pinochet uses something bigger than a helicopter.
I just came here specifically for helicopter jokes. And I had to get all the way to the second to last comment to even get a single reference.
Just another authoritarian attempting to guarantee their power. Pinochet was a dictator and Gabriel Boric is attempting to become one.