Biden's Policies Have Increased, Not Reduced, Future Budget Deficits
Dissecting the president's misleading claims about falling deficits
HD DownloadDuring his State of the Union address in March, President Joe Biden claimed that "by the end of this year, the deficit will be down to less than half what it was before I took office—the only president ever to cut the deficit by more than $1 trillion in a single year.
Since then, he's claimed responsibility for "the largest reduction" in the federal deficit in history.
That claim, in short, is bullshit.
In fact, in the roughly 18 months since he took office, Biden's policies have only added to America's long-term budget deficit, which is getting worse and worse as government spending outpaces tax revenue.
What Biden is trying to do is take credit for expiring emergency spending measures. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government ran an unprecedented $3.1 trillion deficit in 2020, which fell to a still-stratospheric $2.7 trillion deficit in 2021.
This year, with COVID spending largely off the books, the deficit is expected to fall to about $1.4 trillion—though we won't have a final figure until after the fiscal year ends on September 30.
If you eliminate outlier years like 1943, when the U.S. was embroiled in a global war, this year's budget deficit is likely to end up as one of the largest in American history even after adjusting for inflation.

So Biden doesn't really have anything to be bragging about.
As expiring COVID spending made our fiscal situation look better on the surface, Biden was busy adding $2.4 trillion to the long-term deficit, according to the Congressional Budget Office's most recent estimates.
That's due to Biden's American Rescue Plan, the bipartisan infrastructure package, and the $1.5 trillion federal budget that was passed in March. If the president's multi-trillion-dollar Build Back Better plan had become law, we'd been in even worse shape.
On the chart below, the grey columns represent the projected deficits for the next 10 years when Biden took office. The red columns are the projected deficits a year and a half into his presidency. Biden can talk about reducing the deficit all he wants, but the truth is that he's added to it.

"The federal government's budget is on the road to hell," warned former Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin back in 2011. That was before Presidents Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and now Joe Biden each went on a spending binge that has made our fiscal future even less stable.
Biden wants you to focus on just a small part of the overall picture. But the deficits for the past two years and this year are a misleading indicator of America's overall fiscal health.
And to claim that he has reduced the deficit is worse than misleading. It's an outright lie.
Photo Credits: CNP / Polaris/Newscom; Mykhaylo Palinchak / SOPA Images/Newscom; MEGA / Newscom; Abaca Press/Gripas Yuri/Abaca/Sipa USA/Newscom; Ron Sachs/CNP; SplashNews/Newscom; Bob Daemmrich/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom.
Music Credits: "Threat (Good Remix) Instrumental Version," by Wearethegood via Artlist.
Graphics by Adani Samat and Isaac Reese. Edited by Regan Taylor. Written by Eric Boehm.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What's with this obsession with Joe Biden? Is it just because he happens to be President right now? We should be talking about Trump. Trump was worse.
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
It's okay to criticize Biden (even the NYT does it), since the Clinton/Obama gang wants to replace him anyway.
You have to be kidding, right? There has been no worse president than this fool of a puppet. People are suffering. They weren’t under Trump!
COVID, assfuck!
I really wonder if people believe this line of thinking? It seems so obviously untrue that it can't really convince anyone, right?
It works on people who only get their news from MSNBC and NPR.
I really wonder. There's a lot of budgeting fun math that happens when discussing the deficit and debt, but this one is really plainly wrong and goes against even a basic feeling about what the government has been doing. It "feels wrong", and in this case it is wrong.
So, it's a talking point. I think that just might be because they don't have other things to talk about and so they're just sending it out. I don't know if anyone really buys it though.
I don't know if anyone really buys it though.
I doubt the average NPR listener can tell you exactly what is wrong, but I don't think the average NPR listener hears these statements without smelling something vaguely fishy, hence the low support for running Biden again.
I have two very progressive neighbors who I know only listen to NPR and MSNBC. One is a huge Elizabeth Warren fan, and actually organized local get out the vote groups for her. The other is a permanent welfare recipient who hates all things Republican. I know he only watches MSNBC because he 'borrows' my cable and internet and fills my DVR with recordings of the Rachel Maddow show. Also, I can hear it from outside, it's on that loud.
Beyond that, I can tell you that they will repeat almost verbatim whatever is the currently trending democrat / progressive talking point, uncritically. Whether it's 'Insurrection!' or 'Threat to Our Democracy!' or 'Antifa is just an Idea'.
I can guarantee you that they both believe that Biden has lowered the deficit, which is a good thing. Also that he should have spent more, which would have been a good thing, but those pesky Republicans stopped him.
The deficit IS lower. Look at the two charts above for crying out loud.
The author is saying Biden did nothing policy-wise to lower the deficit and it will rise is subsequent years. Which is true.
Are you people that dense?
Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.
They finally granted you bail?
Why are you helping your bum neighbor steal?
I'm paying for 3 TV's. I can put them where I want.
Fair enough.
Shrike raises his hand.
I believe that, in politics and when referring to statements by Democrats, it is a spoken untruth. Only Republicans lie.
Well, from 2.8T to 1.4T IS cutting it in half.
Promises made, promises kept.
^
This is the same way the genie in the bottle fulfills your three wishes, right?
When you've lost Boehm, you've lost America.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/12/exclusive-jan-6-committee-is-using-innocent-americans-assertion-of-their-constitutional-rights-as-proof-of-guilt/
When any progressive talks to you ask them why they are a child molester. If they say they aren't that proves their guilt
You voted for this flaming pile of garbage of an Administration because you didn't like mean tweet, Eric.
You can write all the articles you want, and we're not going to forget that.
Ugh. Not suppsed to be a reply.
The most important part of that story is that the committee is not allowing them to record the depositions and refusing to provide them full transcripts of the depositions as they are required to do by regulations.
On top of that they are asking questions that are protected by the 1A such as who they work with, who their donors are, what their connections are (the very same questions the IRS was guilty of in 2012).
Aside from the 10% of the public that think we're heading in the right direction, who is actually listening to this shit pile of a committee? Of the hardcore lefties that I know, very, very few have even mentioned this shitshow.
Eric, who got your POTUS vote?
Was it reluctant or strategic? I keep forgetting why they all voted for Shittin Joe.
the Hulu docu-drama on Boehm's descent into anarcho-violence will be fun
Fuck you, Reason
https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1546869482278342660?t=ISJhyGtIIZPWw3NadHbkbw&s=19
My team and I have been monitoring the BA.5 variant of COVID-19 for months. We're prepared, and we know how to manage this moment with the vaccines, treatments, and other tools we have made widely available.
[Link]
The number of people calling for masks and lockdowns is disturbing.
I expect to see the usual suspects begin mentioning them as sound policy ways we can reduce the spread, two years of evidence be damned.
Submitted without comment - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1qju6V1jLM
Every time Biden lists off one of his stupid 'technically true but irrelevant' statistics, I'm reminded of 'alternate facts', which was simply Trump-speak for the same exact thing Biden does all the time.
The media remains silent.
A return to normalcy. - Eric Boehm
The Gee-Oh-Pee promised to 1. enslave women, 2. shoot hippies, latinos, dark people over plants, 3. confiscate every possible asset until the economy collapses again because God. The Dems promised 2. and 3. above, but left out enslaving women.
The LP fielded an antichoice female burdened by an anarchist communist veep, no borders and vigilante murder-executions planks added in 2018. So Eric thinks voters should make women unpersons, get shot, live in Hoovervilles and legalize murder?
Why use a sock, Hank?
He largely uses the same phrases! He can’t help himself.
What Biden is trying to do is take credit for expiring emergency spending measures. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government ran an unprecedented $3.1 trillion deficit in 2020, which fell to a still-stratospheric $2.7 trillion deficit in 2021.
So Biden deserves no credit for the falling deficits?
Okay. Fair enough. He doesn't deserve such credit although the deficit IS falling - for now.
I do know he gets the BLAME for that $3.1 trillion deficit and it is not Biden. It is the Con Man - the self-described King of Debt.
Trump - record deficits, record spending, and worst 4 year economic record of any President since Hoover.
And according to the Heritage chart Trump will reman the record setter for highest deficit though 2031.
You picked a loser, wingnuts.
(Biden sucks too)
You're just not that intelligent are you shrike.
I'm glad senile Joe is president, you cultist.
Not that he has done anything worth praise (he hasn't) but because you Alex Jones QAnon freaks are all crying about inane shit.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. Turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
Turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
You happy he's president because you both are pedofile scum
Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.
Yes, but he's increased the number of government employees, who will reliably vote Democrat going forward.
Wrong.
Federal employment totals changed little in calendar year 2021, the first 12 months of the Biden administration, down by 1,356 positions in that time to 2,170,157, according to data newly posted by OPM.
https://www.fedweek.com/federal-managers-daily-report/federal-employment-numbers-little-changed-in-calendar-year-2021/
Trump Added More to the National Debt Than Obama and Bush
When President Trump was inaugurated, the CBO projected $10 trillion in deficits over the 2017-2027 decade. By the time Trump left office, CBO’s estimate had grown to $13.9 trillion.
Reducing deficits from the $10 trillion projection should have been easy. During Trump’s presidency, faster-than-expected economic growth raised the ten-year revenue projections by $1.3 trillion, and lower-than-expected interest rates shaved the ten-year interest cost projections by $2.6 trillion. That’s $3.9 trillion in automatic budget savings without lifting a finger.
Instead of building on those savings, the president helped enact $7.8 trillion in new initiatives, flipping his total fiscal imprint to a $3.9 trillion net cost. The largest drivers were pandemic-relief legislation ($3.9 trillion), the 2017 tax cuts ($2 trillion), and legislation raising the discretionary spending caps ($1.6 trillion). Other costs included disaster aid and other discretionary spending ($493 billion), repeal of several Affordable Care Act-related taxes ($299 billion), and hundreds of small policies ($201 billion).
Brian Reidl
Trump legacy on deficits is pure shit.
Did anything happen during his term. Like say state governments shutting down the economy?
Yes.
And Obama had to deal with the teeth of Bush's financial collapse.
Most presidents deal with a crisis.
Biden is dealing with the bust cycle of the credit binge of 2020. When a nasty recession hits in the next year Biden may as well pack his bags.
Pack up, Joe. You're fucked.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. Turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
Turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Now do HAPPERINFLATION!
I love how shrike ignores that revenue actually went up after the tax cuts.
Designate, even conservative economists shoot this down. Yes, GDP increased - as it does except when we're in a recession or depression, by definition, and so taxes increase with economic activity. The amount however is less than what would have happened without the tax cut. At best, again according to conservative economists, you recoup maybe 1/3 of a tax cut in increased economic activity.
"While policymakers are gearing up to address tax reform this fall, some have advocated for abandoning true reform and instead focusing solely on tax cuts. To combat arguments that such cuts will balloon the national debt, tax cut advocates have argued that the cuts could pay for themselves, largely through faster economic growth. Advocates point to tax cuts in 1981 and the early 2000s to make this case.
However, this claim is false. Tax cuts don’t pay for themselves.
While well-designed tax cuts may grow the economy (often not as much as tax reform), there is no case in which they could grow the economy enough to be self-financing. At best, tax cuts can finance a fraction of their costs through faster growth – and maybe not even that.
In this paper, we show:
There is no theoretical basis to suggest tax cuts could be self-financing. To do that, the economy would need to grow by $5 to $6 for every $1 of tax cuts.
There is broad consensus among economic models that future tax cuts won’t pay for themselves. Some models find tax cuts would be partially self-financing, while others find the economic feedback would actually increase the deficit effect of tax cuts.
Past tax cuts in 1981 and the early 2000s have led to widening budget deficits and lower revenue, not the reverse as some claim.
Instead of relying on magic bullets and fairy dust to pay for tax cuts, policymakers should ensure rate reductions do not add to the debt. Instead, they should focus on pursuing comprehensive tax reform as has been proposed by numerous commissions, committees, and tax experts from across the political spectrum.
By repealing tax preferences, broadening the tax base, and reducing rates, tax reform has the potential to reduce distortions, improve simplicity and fairness, and grow the economy more – and in a much more sustained way – than tax cuts.
In 1986, Republicans and Democrats came together to agree on a package that cut some tax rates almost in half but also broadened the base enough to ensure revenue neutrality. This model will do more to grow the economy – especially for future generations – than simple tax cuts..."
https://www.crfb.org/papers/tax-cuts-dont-pay-themselves
No you fucking chode, actual revenue went up:
FY 2021 $3.86 (estimated)
FY 2020 $3.71 trillion (estimated)
FY 2019 $3.46 trillion (actual)
FY 2018 $3.33 trillion
FY 2017 $3.32 trillion
FY 2016 $3.27 trillion
https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-tax-revenue-3305762
Oh, and fuck you, cut spending.
This comment exposes the total obsolete thinking of the auithor:
"In fact, in the roughly 18 months since he took office, Biden's policies have only added to America's long-term budget deficit, which is getting worse and worse as government spending outpaces tax revenue."
The author here confuses deficits with the national debt, and government spending precedes taxes, not vice versa. There is no limit to government spending (ie just printing money) except inflation, and this inflation is much less a result of government spending than of corporate greed and global supply issues resulting from the pandemic and now the war in Ukraine. We would be better off if Build Back Better had been passed, creating jobs, adding to incomes and tax revenue, and increasing productivity and expanding supply, which suppresses inflation even when more spending takes place.
I judge the author an economic illiterate, working with assumptions from the days of the gold standard.
"In fact, in the roughly 18 months since he took office, Biden's policies have only added to America's long-term budget deficit, which is getting worse and worse as government spending outpaces tax revenue."
The author here confuses deficits with the national debt
No, he doesn't. A deficit is when your spending outpaces your revenue. The debt is what results from that.
I judge the author an economic illiterate
Physician, heal thyself.
We need to freeze government spending in real per capita terms.
We need to do this at the federal, NY State, NY County and NY City level.
If we do this, we will reduce the deficits, and eventually the debt, over time, as revenue - which typically increases in real per capita terms regardless of tax RATES, catches up and eventually surpasses spending.
And we will achieve this without "austerity."
If we fail to set this course now, then actual "austerity" - cuts in spending, rather than merely the absence of growth in spending -will be required.
Fucking doofus author is lying by confusing the deficit - yearly budget shortfall and the national debt - accumulated over the years.
In fact, the deficit has declined since Biden has been in office and the peak was under Trump in 2020, a person this asshole never mentions. This is the kind of stupidity that the GOP sells, as if they had nothing to do with deficits and inflation, and unfortunately too ignorant fucks buy.
Is Biden and the Democrats responsible for much of the deficit? Of course. Is Trump and the GOP? Fuck yes. This column is bullshit by omission but no doubt enjoyed by the MAGA creeps who dominate here.
Fuck off and die, lying Asshole.
Is Biden and the Democrats responsible for much of the deficit? Of course. Is Trump and the GOP?
FuckAlso yes, somewhat.FTFY
Beg to differ on your edit, The GOP and Trump were fully onboard for Covid bail outs in 2020 and Trump lobbied for higher payments when he was out of office in 2021. Let's not forget the 2017 tax cut either. Also note the GOP had no platform in 2020 election because of Trump, which indicated they were still fully owned by him and would do whatever he wanted. He didn't care about deficits.
Fuck off and die, lying pile of shit, Joe Asshole.
BTW, lying pile of shit Joe Asshole, your claims are total and complete bullshit, but given that correcting your lying assholery is a waste of time, there's no way I'd do so.
Up yours with a running rusty chainsaw, Asshole. Eat shit and die.
Politician lies. News at 11.
Politician's misleading statements. AKA politicians LIES.
Former Pres. Obama allegedly said of Biden, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to fuck things up.” He was right, Joe Biden has fucked up everything he has been involved with.
Droolin' Joe has yet to address any issue where he has which he has \delivered a result better than what he was handed.
Ya know, it abe abnd f guyfuck the the RASione sSteam poqwered wed siutt.
That;'s tb you get &=$5
Fuck you.
It is truly epic how much Biden ducked things up. You have to give credit where it is due: you couldn’t wreck the US as well as he is if you tried.
Refused to wait for the site to catch up - Fuck you Reason.
Your Gov-Gun enslavement has increased!
Because that's what Nazi's do.. (National Socialism).
As long as you use the USD to get paid and buy things; Government spending is just your 'Slave' labor to the State/Union.
It will take decades to undo the damage Biden has done.
Wow, is Reason’s ardent support for "Dear Leader" Biden fading?
All the while gaslighting and claiming probity and rectitude. It is truly schizophrenic.
How could anyone know!!!! Not like he had a campaign website for what he was going to do!
And Volokh's Ilya Somin, I believe, said he would vote for Biden because trump spent too much.
ADULT BACK IN CHARGE!!!
Good and hard, Reason editors. Good and hard.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money
online visiting this site.> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
it's on the website! read the website! ~~Ken Shultz
Trump did spend too much. The problem is he spent less than the Democrats that Ilya and the Reason crew wanted for things that Ilya and the rest supported.
Trump spent too much = new Dem baseline budget.
And yet the 2021 budget was still roughly 3x any other year except 2020. Trump was not good on spending, but you can't really blame him for 2020 and 2020 should be considered an extreme outlier in any sane analysis.
Same thing as what happened with TARP.
Baseline Budgeting is the worst process in Congress.
Yes, you can blame Trump for 2020, especially if you've been giving him credit for so many other things. Same with the bump stock ban.
He could at least have vetoed a few more bills, made the spenders own up to them.
"2020 should be considered an extreme outlier"
2020 (and 2021 for the matter) has certainly given a lot of chances for news sites and journalists to point to minor improvements in things like jobs in 2022 while ignoring that fact that those things were gutted by the government's response to Covid.
Another fact Shrike will continue to ignore for years to come.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (bet-04) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
Americans like spending and he wanted to get re-elected.