Gov. Polis Wants You…To Be in Charge of Your Own Life
The libertarianish Colorado Democrat is devolving decision-making to parents and trying to lower the income tax to zero.
HD Download"Here in Colorado we actually took it a step further and really devolved [decisions] to local authority. And so we had a very different approach in some of our big blue cities [than] in some of our rural areas. We left it in local hands. Why? Because these are real trade-offs."
That's Jared Polis, the Democratic governor of Colorado, talking to me two weeks ago about his approach to mask mandates. In December, he told a Colorado public radio station that "public health [officials] don't get to tell people what to wear; that's just not their job," and he withstood pressure to impose mandates during the omicron spike. Polis' approach of devolving decision-making seems to be working: Colorado has one of the lowest COVID death rates in the country.
And its population is growing, while California and New York shrink. Florida is also ascendant, but Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is becoming a culture warrior in ways that are likely to backfire. Polis, on the other hand, is bringing an unmistakably libertarian flavoring to the Centennial State. His embrace of letting people decide extends to other areas, too, such as child rearing.
"It's very reasonable to raise your child in different ways. Some parents are helicopter parents, right? Where they watch your kid every moment at the playground," he tells me. "Other parents want their kid to go two blocks [away from] their home, play on the playground, and return home by dinner. The government shouldn't be telling you how to parent."
Polis championed and signed the Reasonable Independence For Children bill, a free-range parenting law designed to stop state overreach when it comes to things like letting your kids play outside. He says the law will allow Child Protective Services to focus instead on serious cases of harm. "We wanted to be clear that in fact, yes, your kids can play alone. That's how kids learn. They explore. I used to hike in the mountains near my home when I was 10 with a friend, without parents."
The 46-year-old Polis, who is openly gay, married, and a father of two, says he got his laissez faire sensibility from being raised by ex-hippies. "I respect freedom. I think that it's great that Colorado has people who are deeply religious and conservative, as long as they don't force their values on others. We have people that are very hedonistic. You name it. It's great because you're free to be the way you want."
Polis started two charter schools, recently signed a law guaranteeing a woman's right to choose in Colorado, and he's relaxed laws on occupational licensing. Back in 2014, as a member of Congress, he was accepting bitcoin for campaign contributions while his congressional colleagues were calling for it to be banned. A serial tech entrepreneur who amassed a fortune estimated by ProPublica to be "in the hundreds of millions" before entering politics, Polis is committed to a strong economy and says the proper state income tax rate should be zero.
"We've cut the income tax twice since I've been in office. When I came in, it was 4.63 percent. Now it's 4.55 percent…. We also cut property taxes for two years. We'll need to renew some of that," he says. "We've cut a number of other taxes and fees. Income is not a good thing to tax because it taxes productivity as a society. We like income, we want people to make income."
He's a strong supporter of free speech and wants to keep the government from regulating social media as a public utility, an increasingly popular cause among progressives and conservatives.
"The government needs to tread very, very lightly when it comes to any speech-based regulation of tech or any other industry," Polis says. "I would say federally there is a role for anti-trust law. Now we can have a whole discussion on that. You don't want to overdo that. I would argue it's a very competitive space when you're talking about social media in general. If somebody offers a better service, they'll get there. There's a number of viable different services. If somebody has a better search than Google, there's nothing to stop people from going over and using that."
What are the limits of online speech? Polis says "the only real actionable items should be the same as a direct threat, right? I mean: I will kill so-and-so. That is actionable, is illegal. But other speech…should be refuted if it's misinformation or disinformation. There's not a government role in that."
While happy that the election of Joe Biden "restored rationality to government," Polis feels like not enough policy has changed, especially when it comes to immigration and free trade. "I really believe that tariffs and immigration would solve inflation," he says. "It really would. It would wipe it out, [but] neither party is very good on that right now. Trump took a hard turn against TPP [the Trans-Pacific Partnership] and trade deals. He instituted tons of tariffs. Biden has slowly unwound a few but hasn't committed to it. On immigration, Trump was awful—the worst. Biden is a little better, but I wish [he was much] better."
To be sure, Polis is no minarchist. While critical of President Biden on immigration and free trade, he stands by his argument, made in the pages of Reason in 2014, that libertarians should vote for Democratic candidates because they are "supportive of individual liberty and freedom." He's called for carbon taxes (while recognizing their potential to become slush funds for expansive new government programs), and in April, he signed the largest budget in Colorado history.
Yet in a highly polarized country, he is succeeding by governing mostly from the middle and is hopeful that polarization will recede in the years to come. The country will be 250 years old in a few years, he observes, which he likens to reaching an "awkward adolescence."
"I think it's a time for rediscovering who we are," he says. "The left is right [about] coming to terms with legacies of slavery and racism that absolutely existed; pretending that they didn't doesn't serve anybody. And the right [is correct in] understanding that there's not some collective guilt today for what might've happened 100 or 200 years ago. It's important to be honest about it, but being honest about what your great-grandfather might've done doesn't mean that you have culpability…. We don't believe in blood guilt in our country."
Polis thinks that the conversations we're currently having—however divisive, "hurtful," and ugly at times—will yield "a higher level of understanding," one in which "we preserve the tenants of liberal democracy and our rights and free enterprise."
For the longer conversation with Polis from which the above is taken, go here.
Photo Credits: PJ Heller/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; BOB STRONG/UPI/Newscom; Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons; Michael Reynolds/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA/Newscom; Raquel Natalicchio/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Mykhaylo Palinchak/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom; Tyler Tomasello/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Sebastian Gollnow/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom; PJ Heller/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
Music Credits: "I.O.U." by D.A.H.-Trump via Artlist; "Driving Cars Onto Mars," by Milano via Artist.
Written and narrated by Nick Gillespie. Edited by Regan Taylor.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
No mention of his position on 2A issues? Says a lot.
No shit. What someone doesn't say means so much more than what they do say because now you can make up a bunch of shit and claim it's what they would have said had they not been so deafeningly silent. Then when they disagree you can accuse them of lying and backpedaling because you know what they really meant, and their clarification is just them covering their ass.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Jared_Polis_Gun_Control.htm
No need to lie.
And not even 2a only.
Covid:
“We’ve worked together to protect our families and our communities, by staying apart. We’ve endured loneliness. We’ve put off joyous weddings, birthdays, and graduations,” Polis said.
Environment:
"How many homes and businesses must we lose — how many lives — before we resolve to meet the threat of climate change with the seriousness it demands?" he said.
Race:
The Executive Order incorporates feedback from state employees and community partners expressing a desire for increased focus on equity, diversity, and inclusion efforts across state government. It was originally scheduled to be signed in March, but was delayed due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.
His state is still going after bakers over lgbt issues. Etc.
Guy is not a libertarian on vast majority of policy.
Jesse surely applies the same kind of analysis to Trump (as he sits in the corner fantasizing about Trump taking his wife).
Meh
Pretty sure all the Trump supporters here criticized Trump’s bumpstock ban.
I did shrike.
As I've said multiple times.
But he also isn't Hitler dumbass.
See the thing is, exponentially more people have some sorta fantasy about Trump than know your name.
You seem to have a whole lotta fantasies about Trump too, cuck queen.
Trump's a sleezy real-estate mogul, who loves grandstanding, attention-whoring and the sound of his own voice. He made most of his money showboating and cheating banks.
He was also the best president the US has had since Calvin Coolidge.
We've said all those things many times, Shrike, but you only remember the last one because you're a paid shill and that's what you care about.
What is it that made Trump the best President since Calvin Coolidge? I'm not anti-Trump (I can't stand libs / progs) but I also can't think of much he did to justify that he was good at his job. For one, the turnover rate for his staff seemed high, but that would need to be compared to several past administrations to verify.
I'm not challenging you on this, just asking if you can make your case why you feel that way, or point me to a good writeup that makes a case from a libertarian perspective why Trump was a great president.
God, shut up.
You’re a silly bitch.
*blinks* Who do you know that has described Trump as libertarian? The reason Trump was good is because he was significantly less bad than the other options and the entrenched bureaucracy absolutely despised him because he refused to give them the deference they thought they were due and go along with their flow.
Farmers For Trump all riled up! Got the cows milked, not to the ramparts in defense of their Orange Hero!
I like how you think your behavior is a winning strategy.
Little advice for you, pseudo-intellectual, reductive, righteous bloviating actually makes you look bad, not your opponent.
This is the second such article Reason has published about how super duper libertarian this guy is. And it’s still bullshit.
Whoever formatted that page needs to be fired. Hurts my eyes.
Looks like a douche on guns. If I voted I wouldn't vote for him.
You can deduce from his answers & his actions that he is no different than politicians that say they support the people's right to own firearms. They don't add to the statement "BUT". He is little better than Dementia Joe on the 2A. He signed the law that ended state preemption. So, blue cities & counties could restrict residents' & visitor's 2A rights.
When you're going to hold up somebody as "letting you be in charge of your life", his shortcomings in that regard are more than justified to point out.
Why would people not assume you are a Democrat when you rush to defend them all woth nonsense based on your ignorance of their positions?
Because they possess critical thinking skills and judge someone by what they actually say instead of what you insert into their mouths.
You didnt judge him based on what he said. You judged the poster on your ignorance dummy.
Polis has that reassuring D after his name. That was all Sarc needs to reflexively defends him.
It’s already been discussed here recently sarc. Maybe next time ask why he was ripped for his 2A stance, and you can be taught something.
As the saying goes, "he's the best car in the junkyard." Good on some things, bad (okay, awful) on others, but in aggregate maybe less bad than the rest.
And yet still a whole lot worse than about half of the Republican field, but prettiest marxist and all.
I think Polis is trying to position himself as the Democrat who can draw Republican and independent voters without losing the base as the 2024 Presidential nominee. He can see that Biden is barely hanging on and that Harris would be a disaster even against Trump, so he is getting out there now to be the anti-Bernie for 2024.
He's awful on everything, but feel free to fall for the totalitarian's bullshit
Sarc is already swooning.
What does that have to do with pot, Mexicans or butt sex?
Reason has found their face for "freedom" (or, in truth, their mask for tyranny)
You can be in charge of your own life, just so long as you don't want to own a gun, defend your home from criminal intrusion, use a non approved pronoun when speaking to someone, or refuse a government mandated medical treatment. Other than those small things, he is all about freedom.
Jesus Christ reason.
Don't forget cakes.
He'll let you abort a kid that might have a shitty life, though. As I learned this morning, that's way better for the clump of cells.
The funny thing is that all living things are clumps of cells. It’s a meaningless description. Of course everything a democrat says is meaningless.
To leftists, all you are is a clump of cells. They can mold you to their liking, and dispose of you at will. Your so-called "rights" are a joke to them.
You don't think that principled Libertarians support the use of state violence to force people to bake cakes for causes that offend their conscience?
You are a hard case.
A fluff piece praising a Democrat who has a few good stances. When was the last time they did that for a Republican? Note the shot at DeSantis and Trump. And who could say Biden is good on the border with a straight face?
Honestly, my governor has all these same stances except that he's also very pro-2A, our only statewide lockdowns or mask mandates ended after the 2-week limit as promised (in April of 2020), and he basically let local governments (municipal, county, etc) feel their own way through the entire pandemic.
The only limit eventually set on them was that local orders had to be enacted through a legislative body and couldn't be dictated unilaterally by a mayor, county executive, or public health official.
So, why aren't we hearing about how libertarian Mike Parsons is? Oh (R)Right.
Parsons is a third generation farmer, so of course!
What do you have against farmers, Queenie. Do you not eat?
Classic Farmer bumper sticker line!
Queenie is such an idiotic elitist. She wrongly believes she is smarter than farmers and ranchers, who are some of the most astute business people you'll ever meet, and many who have university degrees in actual sciences as opposed to Queenies woman studies useless degree. It's her sense of envy that makes her so bigoted, because the farmers are driving new trucks while she takes the bus to her job at Starbucks. BTW Queenie I ordered a Venti Salted Caramel triple shot, and you got it wrong. Luckily for you I didn't complain to your manager because I know you are on thin ice and keeping those orders straight is hard.
The best place for Queen would be a lonely island, with a box of tools and seeds.
No. The best place for Queenie is face down, in a landfill. Piled in with her fellow travelers.
Don't worry, that's how that scenario would end anyway.
Useless and incapable.
What a good lil' fascist this one is!
No, you’re the fascist. You are free to live 8n peace. All you need to do is abandon all your bullshit beliefs, and renounce the democrat party and all it’s evil works.
Shrike has no idea of the amount of money, technology, engineering, business skills and education needed to run a farm these days.
Even the smallest non-hobby farms are multi-million dollar enterprises dealing with the latest in veterinary medicine, agronomics, biotechnology, etc.
Shrike apparently think's it's still 120 years ago, and pa's hitching up the mule to plow the back forty, while ma's slopping the pigs.
Yeah, I told someone this. You step into the operating seat of a modern harvester and it's more computerized than a 747 cockpit.
See, they literally love their farmers. Libertarian farmers!
Well, unlike lawyers and activists, they provide actually necessary things to society.
"farmers and ranchers, who are some of the most astute business people you'll ever meet"
Let the Farmers For Trump meeting come to order!
Hahahahaha, fuck you’re such a bigoted piece of shit.
Nothing is more bigoted than a democrat.
Lol, 'won't somebody think of the farmers!'
Where do you think your food will come from when your mush headed master destroys the agricultural industry with his disastrous policies?
Reason is pretty clearly a branch of the DNC.
They write what they're told to write.
Typical left-wing Reason piece from NICK GILLESPIE.
A fluff piece praising a Democrat who has a few good stances.
They're pretty supportive of Justin Amash, Thomas Massie, and Rand Paul.
Justin Amash is/was a Democrat in a GOP skin suit, and ENB, Boehm and several others have a raw and abiding hatred for Rand Paul.
Little leftist Leo, back to gaslight for faggot Reason.
Eat a bullet, groomer.
Amash they believed was a dreamboat, but not so much since Trump left office. Rand Paul doesn't get a fluff piece like this, and in the past couple years the majority of pieces on Paul have been more on how he is bad because he doesn't hate Trump enough for them. I haven't seen any pieces on Massie in ages.
Polis refuses to mandate masks = good guy libertarian
DeSantis refuses to mandate masks = becoming a culture warrior in ways that are likely to backfire.
Welcome to the revolution.
DeSantis, more than any other governor stood up to the lockdowns. Had it not been for the example of Florida remaining normal, God knows how long they would have gone on in other states. DeSantis deserves eternal respect and thanks for that. But because he is a Republican and doesn't think gays should be grooming grade school kids in public schools, Reason has declared him a Goldstein. Reason is very pro freedom like that.
No, Governor Noem of South Dakota stood up to them more than any other governor by refusing to _ever_ go along with them, unlike governors like DeSantis and Abbott who are hoping everyone forgets that they supported the COVID tyranny before they realized it was a losing issue.
Florida never locked down. And it is a much more important state and much harder to ignore than SD.
Florida has the oldest population in the country, and at no point had sweeping State mandates
Polis dropped mandates pretty early as well, at least for lockdowns. No articles about how he was experimenting in human sacrifice.
DiSantis never locked down. And they never mandated masks at all.
Yeah but he banned the mandate which made him literally worse than Hitler.
"doesn't think gays should be grooming grade school kids in public schools"
This tool belongs in Ace Hardware.
I feel your pain, libshit.
It's also clever for a sock puppet to talk about tools.
Piss off, Shrike. You of all people shouldn't be talking about pedophiles.
Shrike should be given a one day trial, a week for all appeals, then executed by slow torture for his crimes against children. Which is still better than he deserves.
DeSantis is right on the cultural issues for the most part. His actions seem fairly libertarian, giving the power to decide education on sex and gender for under 8 yo back to the parents as opposed to the government ran schools. That seems libertarian to me.
As for the Disney thing, his messaging sucked but it wasn't only Disney impacted and it removed a form of corporatism for ten entities. So arguably that was even libertarian.
"As for the Disney thing, his messaging sucked but it wasn't only Disney impacted and it removed a form of corporatism for ten entities. So arguably that was even libertarian."
Sorry cannot agree on that. He is on record saying this is retaliation for Disney's political speech. That isn't libertarian. That they needed to write the legislation in a certain way that also targeted 5 other districts out of over 100 others is even worse- not only is he being arbitrary (leaving over 100 districts alone as he attacks Disney) but he is arbitrary and indiscriminate (hitting those other districts as collateral damage). That isn't libertarian either.
None of these governors is libertarian. They are Dems and Republicans. Trying to argue which one is more libertarian is like arguing which dog is most like a lion.
Polis is horrible on freedom of association and gun rights. DeSantis is erratic on freedom of speech. Let's leave it at that.
Favored nation treatment of corporations is also not libertarian.
Selectively targeting private organizations privileges for daring to speak out against officials, that's libertarian for JesseAz (also would like some huge farm subsidies please!).
It wasn't selective targeting, ten different entities lost their status, he just mentioned Disney and called them out. But it wasn't just Disney impacted by this bill. It's piss poor reporting on this that leads to the confusion.
"He is on record saying this is retaliation for Disney's political speech. "
The only interesting question is why you're such a tool for the guy?
The only question is why you are so fucking stupid, judgemental, elitist and bigotted? Did you mommy tell you you were smart and you believed her?
Another question is why you purposely stated it was specifically targeted at Disney, than when corrected, reverted to personal attacks rather than admit you were misinformed? Oh that's right because your a leftist sycophant pretending to be a libertarian much like Polis.
FYI the legislation was in the works before Disney even decided to get involved in state politics.
Donald Trump is smarter, richer and better than you lol
The only interesting question for you, Shrike, is why you're such a tool for the Democrats?
Oh yeah, because you're paid to be.
Shrike, please go read the actual legislation. Your ignorance is fucking tiring. Go yell about rig counts again.
You mean like Operation Chokepoint and weaponizing the IRS against conservatives?
It didn't target Disney. The actual legislation will effect 6-10 special districts, they have to meet three criteria. It was in the works before the whole kerfuffle started. DeSantis was stupid for specifically naming Disney, but the actual legislation doesn't name Disney, or mention targeting them for the stance. The media is playing on DeSantis's stupid and badly times statement when he signed the legislation and using that to misrepresent what the legislation really does (and the legislation actually brings these special districts back in line with Florida's constitution). Much like the parental rights bills the media is misrepresenting the actual matter to make DeSantis look like a right wing kook out to place homosexuals in camps. It's all scaremongering. And Reason is playing right along. Are we surprised anymore?
Gaslighting us is the hallmark of TeenReason.
It's what distinguishes it from its previous libertarian incarnation.
Overt condemns fighting back and advocates submission.
Consistent.
I don't know why Reason does this thing of posting a video once, than posting it again a week later.
Oh well. Polis is whatever. He's not obnoxious enough to draw my rancor, particularly as I don't live in Colorado anymore. I think the tendency of Gillespie to desperately try to claim people who are not particularly libertarian for libertarianism is something he should resist more. Gillespie can actually be a good antagonistic interviewer. That is a beneficial thing.
Reason, he is not going to fuck you. Try as you might.
Nice to see Reason has become Vox so thoroughly. Next up: DailyKos!
He stands by his argument, made in the pages of Reason in 2014, that libertarians should vote for Democratic candidates because they are "supportive of individual liberty and freedom."
So he's not into broads (NTTAWWT), but he paints with a really broad brush.
He lies.
"Colorado has one of the lowest COVID death rates in the country."
Any chance at all it is due to the altitude and how a virus survives?
Nope, must be the gay democrat.
While critical of President Biden on immigration and free trade, he stands by his argument, made in the pages of Reason in 2014, that libertarians should vote for Democratic candidates because they are "supportive of individual liberty and freedom."
El Oh El.
"I think it's a time for rediscovering who we are," he says. "The left is right [about] coming to terms with legacies of slavery and racism that absolutely existed; pretending that they didn't doesn't serve anybody. And the right [is correct in] understanding that there's not some collective guilt today for what might've happened 100 or 200 years ago. It's important to be honest about it, but being honest about what your great-grandfather might've done doesn't mean that you have culpability…. We don't believe in blood guilt in our country."
Where's the Jared Polis statue I can tear down?
pretending that they didn't doesn't serve anybody.
By the way, this is a strawman lie. We can recognize that Thomas Jefferson had slaves at a time when Slavery was pretty much commonplace throughout the world, especially so in the Arab east and Ottoman empires. It's not 'pretending slavery didn't exist' by keeping his statue up, or keeping his moniker on the elementary school in place.
Jefferson owned slaves and lots of people in his time did. But here's the thing: lots of people in his own time that he mixed with regularly did not and opposed slavery. So the question might be, who're you going to choose as your *heroes* to monumentalize? It's easy to have an *excuse* for Jefferson, but why honor him over others who lived up to our values much more?
"We don't go to him for his views on race, we go to him for his view on economics!" --Leftist
Lol, do we have many schools named after Marx or publicly maintained statues of him?
You're...not good at this, are you?
LOL. QA is an elitist bigot, who has an overinflated sense of her own worth, and delusions of grandeur related to her mediocre intelligence.
Fremont, Seattle Wa has a Lenin statue, does that count?
No, can you read?
Lolol he got you with Lenin and now you’re applying a no true Communist fallacy
So uncreative lol
Nazi Germany didn't have many Hitler monuments before 1933.
You're...not good at this, are you?
do we have many schools named after Marx or publicly maintained statues of him?
Oh, well that makes it okay then.
Fucking retard.
No. Marxism is treason, so we wouldn’t do that.
It is fundamentally the LEFT who argues that "slavery didn't exist" via a one-side argument of omission.
Slavery did exist. You wanna know where else it existed, existed for much, much longer than it did in the US, and was, by various measures far more brutal? Do you wanna talk about that? No, I didn't think so. Fuck off.
It still exists today.
Obo had a lot to do with that.
Interesting side note that most leftist probably wouldn't like, but the 13A didn't apply to Amerindians tribes, and several of them, the so called five civilized tribes, owned thousands of slaves of African descent and kept those slaves for decade after the 13A was ratified. They were also considered far crueler owners by most contemporary accounts.
The question I have for people who say stuff like this is who really doesn't admit our history of slavery and racism?
Seems like a strawman argument/statement to me.
Nobody. Nobody denies America’s history. Not even your most ardent secessionist southerner.
Well except leftist trash who refuse to acknowledge that slavery didn’t end in a vacuum, nor did civil rights just magically happen.
Boy, when I saw that headline I thought: the Farmer's For Trump contingent here is going to be pretty upset.
Clicked through and yeah, as expected.
Give up on your ali sock shrike?
Shrike is orders of magnitude smarter than Jiggly Puff.
Jiggly Puff has a talent though: It can sing. Does the cuck queen have any talents? I have yet to see evidence for that.
Carry on, libshit. The abortion whining isn't gonna prevent the red wave. People are seeing right through it by now. Thanks to Donald Trump. Who is much more successful and smarter and more relevant than you lol
Political movements improve their chances when they overcome base partisanship. Look at the labor movement, to the extent they became a Democrat only one they took big hits. For libertarianism to succeed they have to influence Democrats and Republicans who take up some of their causes though not perfect.
But of course you're not going to hear that from the Farmers for Trump contingent here. They're not libertarians, they're conservatives, indistinguishable in every way from what most rural, older white farmers think. So they see this and think: that guy has a D by his name. How dare anyone suggest he has anything to offer. And so you get their comments here.
Name a political movement that is not partisan.
You could save space by stating "I'm a stupid, bigot" instead of your entire last paragraph. Didn't vote for Trump but people like you fucking disgust me with your elitist fucking attitudes.
And for your information I know and work with lots of farmers. I would state by and large they are smarter and less judgemental than you are. They also run the gambit politically from far left Democrat, to far right republican, to monarchist libertarian. In fact, the majority of farmers and ranchers I know lean more libertarian than most of the people who live in town.
" Didn't vote for Trump"
Cool story, bro!
" I know and work with lots of farmers"
That's not hard to believe!
Carry on. You have generated so many red voters already. I appreciate your work. Because I could care less about impotent libertarians and weak. woke, defeated, mollycoddled liberals at this point.
And you think that's an insult? I'll take farmers and ranchers over elitist fuckheads who have an overinflated and undeserved sense of entitlement like you any day of the week. You just aren't smart.
Accusing others of having Trump fantasies, while your entire head space is literally part of Trumps real estate empire.
Trump owned you and still does. He made leftists drop their masks for good. One of the most significant achievements of a politician in recent times.
Trump is hyper-successful, a winner by any reasonable metric. You are a loser. Trump is better than you lol
It simultaneously shames and arouses Queenie that Trump is better than her by almost any metric. Hence all the weird fetishizing.
Now that more people are recognizing the democrat threat we can finally get around to putting an end to them and their party.
The democrat party is a Marxist revolutionary group. It has no right to exist.
Lol, 'you're obsessed with Trump, but I'm here to tell you how AWESOME he is!'
You're really a dolt.
Lol look at the triggered libshit 😀
Sorry Donald owns your head forever lol
And its population is growing, while California and New York shrink.
The population is growing with California and NY escapees, see Telluride as an example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telluride,_Colorado#Skiing_era
When it gets sufficiently fucked up they'll be on the move again.
If reason is calling polis a libritarian then reason has gone of the leftist rails. No enemy to the left here
Reason is not just calling Polis libertarian, they're running multiple articles to set up his candidacy.
Reason is an arm of the DNC, and it has been assigned to the Polis campaign.
I'd love to see more centrist Democrats. To be represented by a libertarian-ish Democrat would be better then the far-left or conservative-right. Polis is friends with Justin Amash which says a lot about his character.
Libertarian-ish views seem to be growing in the center. If not-quite-libertarians like Andrew Yang, Joe Rogan, and Elon Musk can continue to drive people toward libertarian-ish views, maybe the Libertarian party will have an actual voice one day.
LOL
More gaslighting sockpuppets
There is no such thing as a centrist democrat.
Read the party platform they support.
I appreciate when Polis deviates from the woke party line (and then how the alt-left contingent in Colorado screams). But during COVID it did not do much good when the majority of city and country health Karen statists followed more extreme lock-down protocols. That included refusing to ratchet down local rules when the state eased off.
They called him a "libertarianish" democrat, not a libertarian. What's with all the hardliners here? If you're looking for an electable politician who checks 100% of the same boxes as you... well... good luck with that.
I'm kinda getting the sense there are a lot of self-described libertarians around here who are really just Republicans who don't want to admit it.
It feels like that in the comments. The Reason editors seem to be mostly urbanites that are a bit more pragmatic and used to living among Democrats. Representatives that actually look like their districts would probably look a bit libertarian-ish in most places. It would be nice to see some politicians I don't absolutely hate.
They’re too used to cocktail parties on the beltway, or Manhattan. Filled with assholes like Bill Maher. Who sneer at us and think everything is here for them. They don’t live in the real world anymore.
Or maybe we are actually familiar with Polis's policies and the article listed his few actual libertarian leaning policies while ignoring the plethora of policies that makes him far closer to the hard left. He is no friend of individual rights, but he talks a good game.
And if you bothered to read the comments instead of just dumping on "Republicans" (e.g. anyone who doesn't buy the recent leftward lurch of many Reason writers) you would see several of us have listed Polis's policies that are far from libertarian while also listing Republican Governors' who are far closer to the libertarian spectrum but never get fluff pieces written about them in Reason. Fuck, even DeSantis, who the authors chose to bash, has far better libertarian credits than Polis.
I get the sense that these new sockpuppets popping up work directly for the DNC, and are here to gaslight readers into Reason's mission of ushering leftist totalitarianism.
Another reason to eliminate the DNC. Now and for all time.
There’s a difference between being not quite 100%, and being 25% libertarianish.
"I'm kinda getting the sense there are a lot of self-described libertarians around here who are really just Republicans who don't want to admit it."
Ding, ding ding! Most of these commenters hold views that would be indistinguishable from a Farmers For Trump rally.
When the food crisis hits, it's going to be hilarious when you can't get your avocado toast.
Wow!
He reduced the State Income Tax by 0.07%?
This guy's hard core!
IKR. In two cuts, he managed to reduce the tax by a measly 1.5% (0.07 / 4.63).
Thanks for the revisionist history, Reason. Phony libertarians, Gillespie & Co.
"Just wear the Damn masks!" "Selfish bastards!"
- Gov. Jared Polis 7/13/2020
https://www.newsweek.com/colorado-governor-calls-anti-maskers-selfish-bastards-extends-covid-orders-1517401
You claim that Gov. DeSantis's leadership style will backfire. Yet his firm rejection of mask mandates and fines that waived local punitive mask and business closure measures that violated the civil liberties of Florida citizens actually protected the rights of Floridians to live in peace, whereas Gov. Polis used his regulatory agencies to force compliance with business and professional licensing fines and revocations for non-compliance and allowed local authorities and schools to muzzle people, harming their personal health and harming the civil health of residents in Colorado. Now he supposedly basks in being the non-mandate libertarian Democrat governor?!?!
Sleight of hand approach to mandates aren't libertarian. Empowering and enabling proxy actors like coordinating state officials with local government officials to mandate desired state public policy and compelling/coercing business to do the state's bidding is classic fascism. The phony libertarian refuge of authoritarianism. Authentic libertarian Constitutionalists see through the illusions of phony libertarians who <3 *heart* Facism.
The headline is laughable.
Polis unlawfully put every person in Colorado under house arrest during the Covid panic. His actions caused thousands of suicides, opiod overdoses, homicides, bankruptcies and business failures.
BTW - Polis had nothing to do with the reduction in Colorado income taxes. That was a Constitutional amendment
Correct.
They've treated people's lives during the pandemic like a big game. Their words, not mine. His Lt. Governor, Dianne Primavera said this:
"“I compare us addressing the COVID-19 pandemic to almost an arcade game — you try to fight one problem and another one pops up,” she said. “It’s a balancing act trying to address physical health, economic health, spiritual health.” "
https://coloradosun.com/2020/12/17/teen-suicide-on-eastern-plains/
An arcade game!?!?! There's a classic movie from the 1980's, War Games, where the AI computer, Joshua, offers this advice about playing arcade games:
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."
Had Primavera, Polis, all of the leaders directing the pandemic response heeded that advice and not treated people's live's as arcade games - like Gov. DeSantis was wise enough to know early on - then the suicides, overdoses, homicides, bankruptcies and business failures, the economic devastation, devastation to constitutional liberty and freedom would've never happened. Joshua was correct, the only winning move was not to play.
Big fucking deal. TX has far more freedom and no state income tax.
Polis is only “libertarianish” while campaigning. Otherwise he is anything but libertarian. He (this article) cannot even properly reflect back on the breakdown of masks/No masks cities in his own state. His actions regarding masks were a very weak attempt to get his opponents to forget how awful he has been, and the useless masks were a harmless tool to use for that.
The disconnect between Reason and its readers baffles me.
Readers are libertarians.
Editorial staff and writers are conventional leftists who emphasize any shred of libertarian leanings in the leftist pols they love.
Correct. Part of the coordinated takedown of conservative and libertarian thought forums. Infiltration from within. Aka Controlled Opposition. Like Fox, Newsmax, Conservative, Inc., Cheney, Bush, McCarthy, McConnell, Luntz, etc. Let's stop calling them the Rino wing of the GOP and call them what they really are, the corporate-government authoritarian partnership. What Mussolini called the perfection of Fascism. The illusion of freedom and liberty since government not directly restricting rights and liberties, while it intensely uses its regulatory powers to coerce and manipulate business to be its enforcers. Sleight of hand. That's what Reason supports, calls libertarianism. It's true name is Fascism. Say it.
No, you're Farmers For Trump Republicans. Why do you hang out here?
Red wave is coming whiny little bitch
And your tampons wont save you lol
Momma Polis is busy getting good press for sonny Jared. She so wants him to be the first homosexual president she'll spare no expense. As far as being a libertarian it's the avenue Momma Polis fells is the best way to placate the center.
Jared Schutz. Real name. Not so good a name to win elections when you're a Fascist.
"Gov. Polis Wants You, to Be in Charge of Your Own Life" except if you want to defend it, if someone steals your firearm your ass is going to jail, (not a joke) because as we all know putting crime victims in jail will fix everything.
Colorado Governor [Jared Polis] Signs Bill Nullifying State Preemption
http://www.thegunmag.com/colorado-governor-signs-bill-nullifying-state-preemption
I guess that Polis doesn't really want you to be in charge of your own life.
So, He's good on free speech, covid mandates and free range kids.
He's good on occupational licensing, bitcoin and taxes.
He's pro abortion (which... whatever)
Now, if he really believes that tariffs and immigration would "solve inflation," then he has no actual idea what inflation is or what causes it, and that's a big problem.
And if he thinks Joe Biden has been GOOD on immigration, then that means he's for totally open borders, which is unbelievably stupid - probably the dumbest, country-destroying policy position any human can possibly embrace, especially in America's unfettered - yet broke - welfare state.
Anybody who really believes in "individual liberty" can't possibly support Joe Biden's and the Democrats' drive to centralize all power and control over America's economy into the hands of a few politicians and bureaucrats in Washington. So if he has a "libertarian" bone in his body, he'll recognize that the Democrat Party is the COMMUNIST party, and speak out against it.
Until he does, he's no friend of libertarians...
"he'll recognize that the Democrat Party is the COMMUNIST party, and speak out against it. "
Farmers.
For.
Trump.
????????????
Reason emojis are primitive
Your tears are delicious though 😀
Its gonna get worse for you. And you deserve every bit of it. And we will be here and continue to laugh at you 🙂
Soooooooooo................
Polis -- DeRegulate...
Trump -- DeRegulation Committee...
Author and Leftards in the Comments....
Polis Good --- Trump Bad......
Or just say what's slapping everyone on the face. Polis is a Republican in every way shape and form short of being gay.
Not really, but he pretends that way.
And Reason lies to pump leftist totalitarianism up.
He is pro-Second Amendment so law abiding citizens can use firearms for sport and self-defense. BUT, he says all "military-style firearms" should be banned. If we trust law-abiding citizens to use their non-military-style weapons to defend themselves, why can they not be trusted to do the same with a weapon that looks different? Public safety requires penalizing people who break the law, but must never endeavor to penalize innocent people because criminals violate the law. Now, military style means different things to different people. I suspect a rifle with a pistol-grip is prominent, whether the ammo is .22 or .50 calibre. That grip doesn't make the rifle much more dangerous, if at all, though it is easier to use in close quarter combat operations. It feels to me that Polis is borrowing a little of several points on the spectrum of left-wing to right-wing. It comes off as a feel-good set of unrelated policies likely to reflect short term popularity followed by steep decline. "Be in charge of your own life!! Unless your .22 rifle looks militaryish. Now you have a weapon he is determined to ban. He really has to think this through. I am not buying what he is selling.
Remind me again, what state is Masterpiece Cakeshop in?
As someone that was forced to move out of Colorado because of Gov. Polis's heavy-handed COVID dictates, Mr. Gillespie is off base on this one. He signed 307 executive orders re: COVID in 2020 alone (including "Ordering Coloradans to stay at home") and they just extended their latest COVID restrictions on 4/20/2022. Maybe since it was 4/20 Nick was covering something else that day. Normally I love Nick's videos, but here the video sounded like MSM with a politician lying and the journalist praising his lies. https://covid19.colorado.gov/public-health-orders-and-executive-orders
p.s That tax cut in 2020 that he takes credit for was voted in by referendum by the people (Colorado Proposition 116). He opposed it at the time and his quote on ballotpedia says he'll "make sure that there's no revenue loss to the state by reducing the income tax level." That's no libertarian, large or small 'L'
Polis is a democrat.
This is what democrats want as policy:
https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/
>We don't believe in blood guilt in our country.
Yeah, but an awful lot of people believe in skin guilt. And if this guy is so great, why is Colorado a cesspool of libterdism? Soros is proud, here's your cookie.
"Polis stands by his argument, made in the pages of Reason in 2014, that libertarians should vote for Democratic candidates because they are "supportive of individual liberty and freedom."
Since when?
That's absolutely delusional. Democrats stand for precisely the OPPOSITE of those things.
Reason, stop trying to make 'Polis' happen! It's not going to happen!
"libertarianish Democrat "
Hahahahhahhhhhaahhhaaa!!!
Funniest 2 word oxymoron I have ever heard.
He is doing his best to turn Colorado into a west coast progressive shit hole. I do not get Reasons infatuation with Polis. They pretty much give him a pass on his big government progressivisms and praise his empty lip service to libertarianism. That and he is a woman beater.