Meet Aella: The Libertarian Rationalist Sex Worker Turned Data Scientist
"I am not okay with you making laws that prevent me from doing what I feel is good for me."
HD DownloadMeet Aella.
She's the daughter of evangelical Christians from Idaho, so poor they couldn't always manage to put food on the table. A former factory worker who never graduated college, she became one of the most successful performers on the adult subscription site OnlyFans, earning in some months over $100,000 on the platform. She still does one-on-one appointments but only with clients who can afford to pay her current rate of $3,000 an hour.
But Aella is also known for her oddball social media polls, for sexy and silly personal moments on Twitter, and for using her giant platform to spread hot libertarian takes, such as declaring, "I like capitalism."
"I think generally most of what the government does should be privatized," she writes. "I don't think it should be involved at all in healthcare, social security, or welfare."
"I am not okay with you making laws that prevent me from doing what I feel is good for me," Aella told Reason. "That is the border here. This is the respect of freedom."
She's also an outspoken defender of sex worker rights. She compares her current life to what it was like at the age of 19, when she would wake up at 4:30 a.m. to go do repetitive tasks on an assembly line in a windowless factory, often putting in 54 hours a week.
"Why do people talk about survival sex work but not like… survival factory work or survival burger flipping?" she wonders. Yes, there's exploitation in sex work, but "decriminalizing sex work would let workers actually go get police help if they needed it."
Even before she got rich and famous, back when she was "scraping change off the ground to eat," Aella says she still "had libertarian-leaning economic views."
Reason's Liz Wolfe met up with Aella at her home in Austin, Texas, for a wide-ranging conversation about everything from how sex work made her a better data scientist to why many successful practitioners in her industry are selling not just sex but the personal connections that so many of us are missing in our lives.
Interview by Liz Wolfe; edited by Zach Weissmueller and Isaac Reese; camera by Andrew Miller and Weissmueller; audio post-production by Ian Keyser; graphics by Nodehaus.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wow, the spammers are writing articles now.
I gotta admit, if I quit my job at rite aid, I would want whatever job it is that affords me the ability to spend $3K/hr. on my OnlyFans subscription rather than having to run an OnlyFans account for a measly $100K/yr.
earning in some months over $100,000 on the platform
I believe it was $100k a month.
If all I had to do was show my Adonis-like physique and earn $100,000 a month, you can be rest-assured I'd do it. But, female privilege and all that.
You can probably pretty easily get an audience of guys to fuck you if you wanted. Though, the supply curve on that side hurts your ability to charge for it.
This is a subject where Tony actually SHOULD opine.
Still, $3K/hr. is $480K/mo. if I work my male-privileged 40 hr. weeks, 4 weeks per mo. according to my man-math.
Well, I'm listening to the interview and while she NOW charges $3k a month, there's some nuance there. She experimented with raising her prices to levels which were-- as she essentially describes it--- experimental. She said it reduced her client based tremendously, but she still gets work. The implication as I interpret it is, she does get 'escort dates' at the $3k rate, but she's not getting them 8 hours a day, five days a week. She didn't say explicitly, but I'm guessing she gets a few dates a month.
She actually says some fascinating things--- things which would probably hurt her clientele base if her clientele heard this interview. Like, yeah, Mr. 'I pay $3000 an hour for a hooker', you're being played. You're a mark, and you're being manipulated. Hard.
But can you buy a new Alfa-Romeo for 6400 after just a few weeks?
should you ever buy an Alfa-Romeo?
Depends on whether you want a car that works or one that's nice to look at.
Like most porn stars.
There seems to be some confusion here. The $3000 is what she charges for an hour of old fashioned prostitution
Thanks for your beyond belief blogs stuff. Check out this!
Looking for a few delivered supply of earnings? This is how you could make a respectable earnings each month! After being with out pictures for six months, I commenced finishing a easy on-line pictures over this internet site I located on-line, and I could not be happier now. (res30) After three months of doing this my month-to-month earnings improved through $100,000 in line with month through running for simply numerous hours in line with week... https://reason.com/video/2022/04/20/meet-aella-the-libertarian-rationalist-sex-worker-turned-data-scientist/
Well, Hello, Aella!... 😉
Ok, I'm starting to think maybe we need to be a bit more cautious regarding the bots...
I oppose laws against sex work, but "successful practitioners in her industry are selling not just sex but the personal connections that so many of us are missing in our lives"?
Honestly, I'd have more respect for the guy paying to get laid. Paying someone to pretend they have "personal connections" with you is just pathetic.
Was the customer who said "[sic] I'm paying her $3K/hr. for her personality." available for comment or is Liz Wolfe just going to take the word of someone who literally gets paid to pleasure people?
She missed the memo, you don't pay hookers to stay, you pay them to leave
Getting laid is a personal connection.
I am not okay
And Certified Zoomer!
adult subscription site OnlyFans
The CEO of OnlyFans has a bone to pick with your description of their business model.
but only with clients who can afford to pay her current rate of $3,000 an hour.
But Aella is also known for her oddball social media polls, for sexy and silly personal moments on Twitter, and for using her giant platform to spread hot libertarian takes, such as declaring, "I like capitalism."
If you make $3000 an hour showing your ass to overpaid thirsty Silicon Valley boys who've never known the touch of a woman, you'd better Gotdamned well like capitalism. Because we've kind of had our fill of $100k per month OnlyFans Thots shilling for Bernie and "liking" socialism. So I will admit, this is refreshing.
Yup. I can't see a single thing about this girl I dislike. I would not be happy if she were my daughter, but I am actually quite glad that a woman like this can make a very lucrative living.
I think that $3000/hr was for actual physical fucking.
It is. She moved from being a full time escort to full time cam girl who will fuck a guy if the money is right
Someone HAS to explain to me how this woman, and women like her earn so much on TwitchFans. I mean, she's not unattractive, but compared to all the hotness I can get for free on the intertubes, I'm not paying one red cent, let alone $3000 an hour for a few minutes of one-on-one screen time with her.
And none of this is to suggest that there's something WRONG with her... there's not. But when you tell me your rate is $3000 an hour, there better be something exceptionally right about you.
My guess. She somehow got into the FinDom game.
I'm not googling that.
Basically its like catfishing, but the person being catfished is into that sort of thing
That's like... very meta.
Warren Buffett would love FinDom! After all, he's one of these types who say "The Rich should pay their fair share." Can't you just see him with nothing but a ball-gag, nipple clamps, and a locked humbler handing his wallet to Aella? 🙂
I googled it. It seems to be a new word for "marriage".
Sorry, Financial Domination. It's a new fetish I've seen rising out of the sewers where rich people basically get off to giving money to women who insult them.
It's absolutely fucking insane.
So Mother's Lament was accurate in his description.
In that regard, what do you think her going rate would be to write for Reason?
I've read her blog. She's better than the writers here.
Yep.
Like all of us and Liz Warren?
No, not grom the sewers, but from Keynesian/Socialist Academia...or do I repeat myself?
Save up $3000 and find out!
There are some very kinky people out there, and there are some very rich people out there. When they overlap, there is a very lucrative market in providing them EXACTLY the kink they want.
My wife works with a guy who gets paid several hundred dollars an hour to run a D&D game for kids' birthday parties. I don't see her job substantially different.
But when you tell me your rate is $3000 an hour
Inflation. It was $20/hour before Biden cancelled the Keystone XL setting off world wide price increases.
To be fair, she has to fill her tank like the rest of us do. $3000 an hour here, $3000 an hour there, eventually it all adds up to real money.
You’re in the wrong place Shreek. This is about sex with people older than 12. So there’s nothing for you here.
I think the $3000/hr was for actual physical fucking. Maybe a little expensive for a fuck, bit a fuck nonetheless.
but not "bit"
That costs extra.
Yeah, as usual, Reason's reporting is abject shit. As I indicated above, Aella makes it crystal clear that it's not, exactly, $3000/hr. for one-on-one OnlyFans as much as it is a niche $3000/hr. amateur/celebrity psychiatrist-with-benefits or physical-therapist-with-benefits. And Reason fumbles the description by, for reasons I can assume to be abjectly retarded from every imaginable angle, glossing over the fact that she's also an escort.
Which, when you think about it, $3000/hr. for a naked sparring session with Gina Carano (that could quite reasonably end up as just getting choked out for an hour with no actual sex taking place) seems exceedingly reasonable to me.
I can't imagine who Reason thinks they're persuading or doing a favor with the bait-and-switch, but it's certainly not the majority of dudes in the comments section who have no problems with women hooking. Just problems with consistent naive, anachronistic strawman leftist feminist framing on how good it would be for everyone if evul Konservutiv Kristchun men would get out of the way and allow more women to have sex for money.
why do you spend your time reading and responding to what you call 'shit journalism'?
$3000 for actual sex. They really weren't clear enough about how sheaves her money
why many successful practitioners in her industry are selling not just sex but the personal connections that so many of us are missing in our lives.
^When you try to commiserate with your audience but wind up outing yourself and being between loser and sociopath.
Factory Work is for Uggos
She makes an interesting argument about locking out lower-income customers to make her business safer. There are a lot of layers to peel back on what she says that could piss off people all over the political spectrum.
So instead of Atlas Shrugged, we get Atlas Shagged? Of course she doesn't want anybody interfering with her income stream -- she's in a race she can't win with gravity and biology.
she's in a race she can't win with gravity and biology.
That's why $100,000 a month can help her win that race.
Well, maybe not win it but certainly stay in the race a lot longer than she otherwise could.
More accurately, drop out wealthy when Gravity and Biology win... and win hard.
She's already gotten implants and multiple facial surgeries in the recent past. Just turned 30
Right. Professional athletes have a very similar problem.
4 words 1 acronym
GILF
You know that the "G" could mean "Grandma" or "Grandpa," right? 😉
Golfers?
Not golfers you great fool! Goffers!
Have you seen Susanne Somers, Barbara Eden, Joan Collins, or the late Jack LaLanne? Money can defy a lot of gravity and biology if applied properly.
If the Extropians/Transhumanists/Singularitarians achieve their goals, we'll one day be saying: "What was all that Ben Franklin said about 'death and taxes?'"
Well, at least "What was all that Ben Franklin said about 'death' anyway?
Presumably, we outlived Washington and all the States throughout the Planet and moved on.
A rationalist sex worker... as opposed to what? An empiricist sex worker?
See my pick-up lines below. It's alĺ good in da philosophical hood! 🙂
Do Liz and Zach know that they're encroaching on ENB's schtick? The next staff meeting is going to be awkward.
Also,
"She's the daughter of evangelical Christians from Idaho"
Top Christian haters Shrike and Tony are going to be absolutely thrilled.
Maybe the two Lizzes and Zach will iron things out with a threesome. Definitely Substack content there...
Hoo boy, listening to the interview is even more illuminating.
But I don't wanna. Can't you just give me the jist?
She's an interesting young woman. She's been able to intellectualize what most women do intuitively. She figured out what men respond to, how they respond and why and has built a set of insights based up on her analysis.
She says at one point (when talking about the type of person that pays $3000 an hour for a date) that she's not only selling her identity, she's selling them an identity about themselves. Specifically, she says that men sometimes lie to themselves about what type of woman they're interested in-- ie they may not REALLY be interested in X type of woman, but they want to believe they are.
Her example was: The man that pays $3000 an hour because this woman is both sexually attractive AND a data scientist, they convince themselves that they're interested in this type of woman, "smart AND beautiful" because it makes them "feel like they're a really deep person".
I kind of like her. I find her interesting and thoughtful. But if you read between the lines on how she's running her business, she makes it pretty clear it's all marketing, you're being played and she's maximizing her profit by pushing your buttons.
She does have... a 'controversial' view of sexual assault and hint: It's not in alignment with the #MeToo movement. Like "you're gonna get canceled as fuck if this gets out on twitter" not in alignment with the #MeToo movement. LIke... internalized misogyny not in alignment with the #MeToo movement.
"But if you read between the lines on how she's running her business, she makes it pretty clear it's all marketing, you're being played and she's maximizing her profit by pushing your buttons."
Perhaps, or she is selling a fantasy. And people are ok with that. Honestly, that's what I feel most companies like BP are selling when they push woke agendas.
Can't you just give me the jist?
That's what you're supposed to do to her... Oh wait, I thought you said "jizz." Nevermind, I'll see myself out.
My favorite part is @12:34 where you can, seemingly, witness Liz's brain turn off and then back on.
"I am not okay with you making laws that prevent me from doing what I feel is good for me."
Kind of a lame pull quote though. That's true of everyone. The question is how she feels about laws preventing over people from doing things she things is bad for them.
Listen to the interview, she has a very liberal view ("liberal" being used in the proper sense, not the political affiliation sense) of sexual assault.
It feels like a slightly rigorized version of late 60s sexuality to me. I think there are reasonable points there. She is extremely, extremely Stoic (capital S) in her philosophy as well.
I did think it was interesting at the end how they made explicit the somewhat Utopian aspects of their argumentation. I think they used the term Sexual Utopia slightly in jest, but it was actually a theme running throughout her discussion. Probably the biggest actual divide on my views and most of Reason's editorial. Might be the Left-Libertarian/Right-Libertarian divide as well. That latter point I haven't thought too, too much about though.
I will be curious how her view on things develops. I think she makes some good points, particularly on the margins. I think the justifications against marriage and relationships and compartmentalization of different aspects of our emotions comes from some motivated reasoning as well. The most interesting portion was just hearing survey results though.
Holy shit, this interview might get her canceled.
I feel like you're overselling her... but I don't care enough to listen myself.
I mean, congrats to her for scamming dudes out of lots of money... but she doesn't exactly strike me as in any way special or above average.
https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1516438016046338061?t=RcDp-lFUf6R2coe0a5UIoQ&s=19
when i bring up libertarian issues and ppl are like 'aella u r stupid', it feels to me like im like 'hey i know you're really sick in bed but it looks like ur bedroom has toxic mold, maybe you should get out of bed' and they're like 'you don't want me to recover? you cruel idiot'
Like, my recommends don't come out of isolation! This feels super important - I'm not like "Yes, let's take this thing you're doing to help and just stop that. For no reason. Because I'm an idiot"
My views here feel like they come from an attempt to fix much, much deeper problems; getting out of bed when you're sick might suck and make recovery slower, but *not being exposed to toxic mold* will make recovery faster, and if u cant see the mold it won't make sense to you.
And I'm not saying I'm definitely right; there's a lot of judgment calls to be made in where and how to fix deeper toxic mold problems, but I feel strongly principled in the method of the thing; if the problem is too deep to be obvious, then the solution will be counterintuitive.
She’s a Data Scientist! She went to Data College!
You know where else has a toxic mold problem due to buildings being blown up and exposed to the elements?
Fuck Off, Revanchist Putineer!
love it. if I was a girl (with my current attitudes lol) I'd do the same.
Whore.
Shorter Reason: You will fund degeneracy in public schools, you will worship corporate power, and you will recognize "sex work" as a legitimate business practice. And you will be happy.
By the way, this slut thinks that computer-generated child pornography should be legal.
I'm of two minds on that.
1. It feeds a horrific fetish that shouldn't be fed. Especially with people who get into it because they are bored and looking for novelty and taboo. It can create future offenders.
2. It's completely imaginary and nobody is hurt. You can't and shouldn't punish people for fantasies and things that didn't happen. If nobody is affected, violated or hurt what's the problem?
I'm really torn. #2 is the rational, logical, libertarian view, but my gut instincts say #1 is correct.
It's the intention and what the depiction is. They're sick fucks who want to have sex with little kids, whether they crank to assault or animation.
It's the actual, not necessarily the intention, that harms.
Is it better that actual children be used in its production? Maybe it would be better if computer-generated displaced that produced using actual children.
Sooo...The Holy Bible, Al-Qu'ran, and The Book of Mormon are all verboten for computer generation too?
After all, there are horrible things done to children in all of those works, viable born little children too, and all of humanity is destroyed...twice.
And these Grim Fairy Tales are just as real as any computer generation.
I wonder what her “odd”’sexual desires are?
$3,000 can find out.
I wish Crusty was still around to weigh in.
Don't cry because he's gone, smile because we had him for even a moment.
Crusty Juggler and Agile Cyborg were awesome! I just hate I joined after they left. (Sometimes, I think they were the smart ones!)
Look her up on FetLife...
She was recently banned. Not sure if reinstated
Meet Aella: The Libertarian Rationalist Sex Worker Turned Data Scientist
Now I'm working on my lines:
"Hey, Baby! There's no Dichotomy or Straight-otomy or Gay-otomy or Bi-otomy or Trans-otomy or Pan-otomy between Rationalism and Empiricism!"
"What say we explore the world of the sensory and both give and get in each other's heads too?"
"Let's blow this Nihilist, nothing scene and instead of going for Supernatural "Pie-In-The-Sky," let's enjoy "The Garden Of Earthly Delights!" 🙂 😉
"And You Can Leave My Fedora On!"" 🙂
Joe Cocker--You Can Leave You Hat On- (Official Video) HD
https://youtu.be/hfgwrdYUQ2A
Watching the morality totalitarians here struggling to say "I love what she says, but no one should be allowed to do what she does" without exposing their hypocrisy is hilarious.
Sex work of all kinds should be legal. People will pay a shit-ton of money to have sex. If you're willing to supply that market, why should someone else's moral self-righteousness stop you? Sex, gambling, and drugs shouldn't be illegal.
Lysander Spooner explained all that at great length in 1875. He also explained how priggish coercion made government unworkable, and explains how basic libertarian government is a good thing. Communists and fascists both screech that Lysander was anarchist, but that too is easily seen to be a lie. Search: "Lysander Spooner" +Librivox
This is how you weed out the cosplay Libertarians.
That's a fetish too? Rule 34 confirmed! 🙂
Who among us has not come in our pants upon seeing a hot babe at a Con dressed up as Rothbard?
But how much more nifty would she be in handcuffs and chained to the floor. Now imagine it was YOUR rothbard. You're too easy. Put the lotion down.
For the old-timers maybe. A young Rose Wilder Lane would be a sexy look for women and a Frederic Bastiat would be a sexy look for men.
""Why do people talk about survival sex work but not like… survival factory work or survival burger flipping?" she wonders."
Marxists talk about that all the time. It is one of their central criticisms of free market systems.
One thing about sex work is that it has a time limit and does limit one's ability to have regular romantic relations
Well, she is certainly putting a new spin on the Protestant work ethic.
To paraphrase Mae West: "'Protestant''s got nothing to do with it. I don't see her protesting."
And the Monty Python "It's" Man says: "I'd like to nail her 95 Theses!" 🙂
Nailing faeces to the bejewelled Vatican doors?
"Hey, Marty, why not use Post-It Notes instead?" 🙂
I'm willing to forego some personal freedom for a society that prevents women like this from existing.
Why? How is she harming you?
She's harming every man that ever lived. We all fought and died for a nation were women could be free of being randomly raped pregnant by any random stranger that had the idea in their natural mind. Not sure why we did that sometimes but for fact she's abusing our legacy and basic meaning of life. Women were not provided with society so that they could use it against us an literally steal from us by pawning her ass. Society was never ment to be used as a diseased-ass market place for something that already belongs to us.
Yaknow, besides the point that a prostitute is a plain cut sex offender...
If a fishing hook isn't a hunting weapon, what is?
If a hooker isn't a sex predator, what is?
I see we've attracted another lunatic. How lovely. Well, hopefully this one won't be a coprophage, at least.
Woops... just banned another nationalsocialist sockpuppet. The average IQ here has doubled since Reason added the "Mute Loser" button. Let Bill deal with the hissing and screeching rejoinder. Bye bye crowdbluster...
Said every serial murderer upon being sentenced for his little crusade against "immoral" women.
"Meet Aella: The Libertarian Rationalist Sex Worker Turned Data Scientist"
If you were trying to write the perfect parody of a Reason headline, would you be able to do better than with this real headline?
Lights and smoke and loud loud music, you'll never make a wife to a home loving man.
Truth is, prostitutes are sex predators. I see no reason at all thar women should be allowed to prostitite where male sex predation should remain illegal. Prostitution is not about equality. Simply because a woman uses a hook instead of brute force to hunt their prey does not then make it any less predatory. Fishing is still carnivorous and we're talking about human cannibalism here, not fish.
You might argue that prostitution is natural, and you'd have a solid argument. It is natural. The constitution was written to reflect natural law. So it should be legal. Wait, am i arguing against my own point? No. Prostitution is natural and should be legal, but so too is pimping. Which way would you rather have it? You wanna be a legal slave? Cool, cuz i want that for you also.
"Mankind was created to be equal" whatever, so the loosest interpretation of a clearly unintended broader definition of "mankind" encompassing the species as a whole when written by men who literally kept women as house pets at the time somehow was meant to mean women are unnaturally equal.... thats right, females are not naturally equal. "Anything separate cannot be equal." Few more truthful words, ever spoken. There's no clearer separation amongst mankind than the separation between male and female. One half of the phenotype forces the other half of the phenotype down and fks it pregnant, regardless of anyone's opinion of it, especially the impregnated one. Mankind as a whole was stronger for this than any other way we could have been proven by the fact it's exactly how we've been for at least 50,000 sold years of history. Yup, up until we literally dominated an entire planet to the point people could be comfortable enough to deny reality itself.
But know what? Ideals are nifty and all but if those ideals just don't reflect reality and natural law, thats tyranny.
Deflection and denial of these solid and irrefutable points im making, is all together misogyny, misandry, pederasty, and simultaniously. Quite a few much more heinous nouns than "rape." Rape is literaly a fictitious noun. It's pure subjectivity. It literally means so many different things its just a meaningless word and even encompasses every virtue of your existence. If there never was most definitions of rape, you would not even exist. Denying most definitions of "rape" are perfectly natural to human beings is denying your own existence. Thusly, you should have no vote. You're vapor.
Its literally when we stopped raping them that america went full psychotic and collapsed under the weight of its own bullshit.
Hey, hookers, lesbians, fags, junkies, imagine some guns and go fight putin. No? Well pfft. Fk you then. Im going back to my ps1 emulator now. Die softly. Need you for nothing. You're not even human anymore.
https://randomwordgenerator.com/
That site assures me Libertarian is not a word.
What an odd performance!....
I can afford 250 for 5 minutes, and that is enough for me.