Why Electing Biden (or Trump) Won't Settle Anything for Long
In an age of parties run by extremists, the next majority is just an election away, explains political scientist Morris P. Fiorina.
HD DownloadYou're kidding yourself if you think our long, national, electoral nightmare will be over on Nov. 3—and not just because it might take days or even weeks before we know who won.
If Donald Trump wins, anti-immigration, anti-abortion, and protectionist Republicans will continue pushing their largely unpopular agenda in Washington. If Joe Biden wins, then anti-capitalist, anti-school choice, and pro-regulation progressives will rush to pass legislation similarly out of sync with America's more centrist electorate.
But whoever wins, there's a good chance that power will flow to the other side in 2022 or 2024. That's because we're living in an era of "unstable majorities," according to Stanford political scientist Morris P. Fiorina. Since the Reagan era, Republicans and Democrats have sorted almost completely into ideologically conservative and liberal groups, raising the stakes of each election even as fewer people identify with either major party. For the past 20 years, control of Congress and the White House has jumped back and forth between increasingly extreme wings of both parties.
The incoming majority rushes to implement its highly ideological agenda, overreaches, and gets bounced in the next election or two, says Fiorina. That's what happened to the Democrats and Barack Obama in 2008. They won the White House and both houses of Congress in a landslide, only to surrender control of the House and Senate in 2010. Trump won in 2016 but the GOP promptly lost the House two years later.
Fiorina doubts that whoever wins the presidency and control of Congress will be able to enact an agenda that satisfies a large enough majority of Americans to keep power for more than a few years. "I don't think we're on the verge of civil war," he tells Nick Gillespie. "The fever swamps of our newsrooms and social media are just not reflective of the mood out there in general but there are big problems and no one seems to have a good idea of how to get a handle on them."
Written and Narrated by Nick Gillespie. Edited by John Osterhoudt. Feature Image by Lex Villena.
Music: "Believe" by Maya Pacziga; "Free Radicals" by Stanley Gurvich; "Discovery" by Kevin Graham
Photos: Ivy Ceballo/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Everett Collection/Newscom; Adam Schultz/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Dominick Sokotoff/Sipa USA/Newscom; Ron Sachs/Pool via CNP/SplashNews/Newscom; Joel Gillman/Flickr/Creative Commons; Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0; NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization/Flickr/Creative Commons; Gina M Randazzo/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Luis Santana/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Michael Nigro/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Mindy Schauer/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Mindy Schauer/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Jay Janner/TNS/Newscom; JASON REED/REUTERS/Newscom; John Rudoff/Sipa USA/Newscom; Erica Price/Sipa USA/Newscom; Michael Nigro/Pacific Press/Newscom; Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom; Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom; Niyi Fote/ZUMA Press/Newscom; Richard B. Levine/Newscom; Dominick Sokotoff/Sipa USA/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This has been going on longer than since the Reagan era. What is new is democrats insistence that the president must win some popular vote that has no basis in law. Then when they don't win they blame gerrymandering, or ballot rigging, or preventing people from voting, or russian interference, or whatever comes to mind in order to distract their side from the very real fact they lost and they cannot understand why (hint: their candidates aren't as popular or as intelligent as they believe)