American as a Social Movement
The fifth post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
The fifth post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
Someone needs to do a study on this.
It's probably not a good idea to lead government bureaucrats follow their own idiosyncratic interpretations of the U.S. Constitution
The formal charges are child neglect and criminal negligence.
The fourth post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
The third post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
The decision does not reach the merits of President Trump's attempt to divert military funds to build his border wall.
So the Colorado Supreme Court held today.
Episode 266 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Jerry Taylor on why he now considers climate change a serious problem.
(1) If they're alleging sexual abuse. (2) If they're alleging they were libeled as sexual abusers. (3) Both. (4) Neither.
The second post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
A truly interesting and unusual Supreme Court line-up.
The symposium will include posts by contributors to this new book on what makes America and its history distinctive.
Sometimes Dershowitz gives really bad advice
An awful lot, but who's counting?
An interesting separation of powers question coming in the Female Genital Mutilation statute / Commerce Clause / Religious Freedom Restoration Act / Dawoodi Bohra litigation.
The President's effort to coerce Mexico into blocking the emigration of its own people undermines the distinction between keeping people out and locking them in. It thereby makes US immigration policy analogous to the Berlin Wall.
A lower court decision the Supreme Court is currently considering reviewing has important - and dangerous - implications for property rights.
Where is the treasure? Where are the assets? Where's the loot?
A 1922 case often cited as showing Italians may not have been considered "white" doesn't really support that inference
So holds a (nonprecedential) California Court of Appeal decision in the Jenni Rivera heirs vs. Univision case, though the decision is narrowly tied to these particular facts.
A recent dissenting opinion by Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights some of the dangers of the enormous scope of modern criminal law.
The symposium includes contributions by 16 legal commentators, including VC bloggers Keith Whittington and myself.
"Students are expected to attend classes. If they fail to do so without a valid excuse, their absence is duly-noted and appropriate action is taken. But the teachers at the center of this controversy expect different treatment."
A small step forward for self-defense rights.
In redefining "waters of the United States," the Obama Administration failed to follow the Administrative Procedure Act.
Some thoughts on a new draft article by Jeff Fisher and Alli Larsen
Sound words from a federal district court decision handed down last year.
Maybe a little, but don't get carried away
The appellate court reversed, though without reaching the First Amendment question.
More often than you might think
Russia's interference in the 2016 election was wrong. But the reasons why are harder to pin down than you might think. Not all foreign interference in elections is unjustified. Far from it, in fact.
Tire chalking, evidence tampering, and robocalls.
An interesting decision from the Fifth Circuit, allowing a negligence claim to go forward against organizer Deray Mckesson; the court's reasoning relies heavily on the illegal nature of the protest.
Prof. Josh Blackman (South Texas) asks this very interesting question.
Just filed yesterday, and I think it should prevail.
So holds a District Court decision, though stressing the "may be."
That's not how any of this works
So holds the Third Circuit, though in a narrow opinion.