A Skeptic's Look at Administrative Constitutionalism
It's probably not a good idea to lead government bureaucrats follow their own idiosyncratic interpretations of the U.S. Constitution
It's probably not a good idea to lead government bureaucrats follow their own idiosyncratic interpretations of the U.S. Constitution
The formal charges are child neglect and criminal negligence.
The fourth post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
The third post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
The decision does not reach the merits of President Trump's attempt to divert military funds to build his border wall.
So the Colorado Supreme Court held today.
Episode 266 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Jerry Taylor on why he now considers climate change a serious problem.
(1) If they're alleging sexual abuse. (2) If they're alleging they were libeled as sexual abusers. (3) Both. (4) Neither.
The second post in the Volokh Conspiracy symposium on "Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative" (ed. by Joshua Claybourn).
A truly interesting and unusual Supreme Court line-up.
The symposium will include posts by contributors to this new book on what makes America and its history distinctive.
Sometimes Dershowitz gives really bad advice
An awful lot, but who's counting?
An interesting separation of powers question coming in the Female Genital Mutilation statute / Commerce Clause / Religious Freedom Restoration Act / Dawoodi Bohra litigation.
The President's effort to coerce Mexico into blocking the emigration of its own people undermines the distinction between keeping people out and locking them in. It thereby makes US immigration policy analogous to the Berlin Wall.
A lower court decision the Supreme Court is currently considering reviewing has important - and dangerous - implications for property rights.
Where is the treasure? Where are the assets? Where's the loot?
A 1922 case often cited as showing Italians may not have been considered "white" doesn't really support that inference
So holds a (nonprecedential) California Court of Appeal decision in the Jenni Rivera heirs vs. Univision case, though the decision is narrowly tied to these particular facts.
A recent dissenting opinion by Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights some of the dangers of the enormous scope of modern criminal law.
The symposium includes contributions by 16 legal commentators, including VC bloggers Keith Whittington and myself.
"Students are expected to attend classes. If they fail to do so without a valid excuse, their absence is duly-noted and appropriate action is taken. But the teachers at the center of this controversy expect different treatment."
A small step forward for self-defense rights.
In redefining "waters of the United States," the Obama Administration failed to follow the Administrative Procedure Act.
Some thoughts on a new draft article by Jeff Fisher and Alli Larsen
Sound words from a federal district court decision handed down last year.
Maybe a little, but don't get carried away
The appellate court reversed, though without reaching the First Amendment question.
More often than you might think
Russia's interference in the 2016 election was wrong. But the reasons why are harder to pin down than you might think. Not all foreign interference in elections is unjustified. Far from it, in fact.
Tire chalking, evidence tampering, and robocalls.
An interesting decision from the Fifth Circuit, allowing a negligence claim to go forward against organizer Deray Mckesson; the court's reasoning relies heavily on the illegal nature of the protest.
Prof. Josh Blackman (South Texas) asks this very interesting question.
Just filed yesterday, and I think it should prevail.
So holds a District Court decision, though stressing the "may be."
That's not how any of this works
So holds the Third Circuit, though in a narrow opinion.
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on other grounds?
Congress should fix its FGM statute—and all the other ones too.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks