The Other Impeachment Count
Count Two's charges against the President are both more serious in their long-term implications for the constitutional separation of powers, and less defensible on Trump's part, than Count One's.
Count Two's charges against the President are both more serious in their long-term implications for the constitutional separation of powers, and less defensible on Trump's part, than Count One's.
Oral argument was in July, so why hasn't the court issued an opinion yet?
Ohio prohibits doctors from performing abortions if Down Syndrome is the reason. Does such a law impose an "undue burden" on the abortion right?
The first reference to the term "retcon" in a Westlaw-accessible court opinion.
If a case warrants an expedited appeal, the Justice Department should act like it.
No constitutional provision should be ignored just because it may be difficult to discern
The court was correct to reject most of the arguments, but was too dismissive of the First Amendment concerns.
This is really getting ridiculous, and I'd be embarrassed for the Times if I thought its editors were capable of being embarrassed these days
E-cigarettes, cyanide, and intergalactic trade monopolies.
The D.C. and Fourth Circuits used organized approaches to seating for high-profile arguments
A new review essay in Science warns of the dangers of prohibitionist thinking
Today's decision was based on the California Constitution.
but the New York City Regional Emergency Medical Services Council denied the application, by a 12-7 vote.
Criminal charges were eventually dropped, and the civil lawsuit has just been thrown out.
Seth Barrett Tillman and I defend the constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act in Atlantic
What an appalling customer service experience.
That's the claim in a federal lawsuit, which a federal judge just allowed to go forward.
Send us a self-addressed stamped envelope, and Randy and I will send you an autographed bookplate
has been approved by a 17-10 vote of the County Legislature, and will become law if signed by the County Executive.
An in-depth look at the written and unwritten rules to attend oral argument at the Supreme Court
That's the question in a First Amendment lawsuit, which a federal judge has allowed to go forward.
Seth Barrett Tillman and I suggest that the answer is yes.
I took part in panels on these topics at the recent Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention
An interesting question now being litigated in Vermont federal court.
Football prayers, Peanut M&Ms, and illegal palmetto berry harvesting.
The saga of Richard Liebowitz (alleged "copyright troll," though that's tangential to this particular controversy) continues.
Vanity plates are private speech in a nonpublic forum, the court holds; restrictions on such speech must be viewpoint-neutral and reasonable.