How Special Interests Twisted Federal Sugar Policy To Cost Consumers $2.5 Billion Every Year
Meet Dwayne O. Andreas: The man most singularly responsible for the fact that it is corn, not sugar, in most American sweets.
Meet Dwayne O. Andreas: The man most singularly responsible for the fact that it is corn, not sugar, in most American sweets.
Meet Dwayne O. Andreas: The man most singularly responsible for the fact that it is corn, not sugar, in most American sweets.
Government policy bears much of the blame for the use of high-fructose corn syrup, and Trump's policies will not change that.
A new report from the GAO highlights how America's system of sugar subsidies and tariffs costs consumers about $3.5 billion every year.
Big corporations and entire industries constantly use their connections in Congress to get favors, no matter which party is in power.
The tech billionaire isn't alone among the mega-wealthy in getting piles of money from government at all levels, say the authors of Welfare for the Rich.
Sugar subsidies are welfare for the rich. They cost consumers billions a year.
Sugar subsidies are welfare for the rich. They cost consumers billions a year.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.