Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Blumenthal v. Trump
Petitions for certiorari in the other two Emoluments Clause cases remain pending.
Petitions for certiorari in the other two Emoluments Clause cases remain pending.
At least four judges (and one senior judge) believe the standing question is worthy of en banc review. Will the Supreme Court think it's worth certiorari?
In a brief, direct opinion, the D.C. Circuit concludes that members of Congress lack standing to sue the President alleging a violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause
The Practices of our First President Suggest That President Trump is not violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses
DOJ’s Schrödinger’s Briefs in the Emoluments Clauses litigation are in tension with a 2009 OLC Opinion
CRS has relied on Tillman’s Scholarship about who holds an “Office . . . under” the United States
[I'm delighted that Profs. Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman, have passed along this response to the recent decision in the Emoluments Clause litigation against President Trump; naturally, I'd be delighted to post a response in turn from their adversaries. -EV]
Are we all about to get a look - finally! - at Trump's tax returns?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10