Can the ACLU Serve Progressives, Libertarians, and Conservatives?
ACLU legal director Ben Wizner warns that Donald Trump’s war on dissent endangers the First Amendment, urges Americans to protect speech they dislike, and reflects on Edward Snowden’s enduring legacy.

The Reason Interview with Nick Gillespie goes deep with the artists, activists, entrepreneurs, policymakers, and visionaries who are making the world more libertarian—or at least more interesting—by championing free minds and free markets.
Today's guest is Ben Wizner, deputy legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). He says that President Donald Trump's second term has brought an all-out assault on free speech—targeting comedians, immigrants, universities, and even law firms that take the "wrong" cases.
Gillespie and Wizner put Trump's actions in the context of past presidents and discuss whether the ACLU has strayed from the days of defending the free speech rights of American Nazis in Skokie, Illinois, Unite the Right protesters in Charlottesville, Virginia, and the National Rifle Association (NRA) in New York.
They also discuss the legacy of Edward Snowden, with whom Wizner worked, and whether government spying on citizens has gotten better since the whistleblower revealed illegal mass surveillance of Americans during the Obama administration.
0:00—Introduction
1:04—Free speech under Trump
5:33—Comparing Trump to Biden on free speech
9:42—Have Americans become more comfortable with censorship?
16:21—The Federal Communications Commission and Jimmy Kimmel
25:43—What are Trump's standards for protected speech?
28:46—ACLU cases protecting the speech of immigrants
40:12—Why the ACLU defended the NRA
45:02—Has the ACLU remained committed to its mission?
53:52—Protecting the rights of students on college campuses
55:46—Snowden and the state of mass surveillance
- Producer: Paul Alexander
- Audio Mixer: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can they, sure. Will they? No.
. Fucking commie scum can GDIAF
I don't know that they can in practice. ACLU has been a captured partisan organization for decades and there is little evidence that theyare willing to defend the right.
FIRE is a more modern version that initially mostly took on cases of the right being censored but was willing to defend both sides. They have since flipped and almost exclusively protect the left.
Yeah that was disappointing because they were my go to when the ACLU got hijacked.
I'm sure there are still some individuals there that are trying. The organization as a whole can go in the same bin with Cato.
Organizations like this have the real risk of failing to live up to the original charter. Instead of creating one big endowment with your wealth when you die, diversify and spread that shit around. Otherwise the world is better off if you just spend it all on hookers and blow - now - while you are still alive. Bill Gates wealth will probably end up causing death and suffering for hundreds of years after he is done with this life.
Speaking of original charters, the 1972 LP platform grew at 11% per year in 1972 with a slope of 42. Then infiltrating "helpers" doubled the word count and slope went to 4 in 1980, turned negative in '84 and never returned to 2 until 2016. Thanks to the Jesus Caucus we now have votes, membership and funding all converging on zero. The LP needs a reset to the original platform--and mebbe a rope.
More access to horseless carriages. And goddammit, more Comstock.
The ACLU was once high on my list of respected institutions and I even donated to the a few times through my American brother-in-law.
But they threw that all away to become DNC mouthpieces and take (D)ecidedly anti civil-liberties stances in favour of party narratives.
Pretty much everything they say nowadays is worthless because of their activities of the past decade.
ACLU except number 2.
...except number 2.
I have not noticed any civility from them to either property rights or free association either.
/poop emoji.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⡛⠛⠷⣶⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠙⠻⣷⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣾⠟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣹⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⡴⠞⠉⠈⠻⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣤⣿⡧⠤⠤⠶⠖⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⠟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣦⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣴⠞⠉⠀⠉⠙⠻⣶⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⡴⠞⠉⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠘⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢈⣿⣆⣴⠟⠉⠉⠉⠛⢶⡖⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⡾⠋⠉⠈⠉⠻⣦⣰⣿⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣾⠟⠋⡿⠁⢀⣾⣿⣷⣄⠈⢿⡀⠀⠀⠀⢠⡟⠀⢠⣾⣿⣷⡄⠘⣿⠉⠛⢿⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⠏⠀⠀⢸⡇⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⢸⡇⠀⠀⠀⢸⡇⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⢹⡇⠀⠀⠙⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⡏⠀⠀⠀⠘⣧⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⣸⠇⠀⣀⣤⢾⣇⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⣾⠁⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣧⡀⠈⠉⠁⢀⣴⠿⠞⠋⠉⠀⠀⠻⣦⡀⠈⠉⠁⣠⡾⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢀⣠⣶⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠉⠙⠛⠒⠛⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠚⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡼⠿⢷⣦⣄⠀⠀
⠀⣠⡿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣟⠛⠛⠒⠶⠶⠶⠶⠶⠶⠶⠖⠚⠛⢛⡷⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⠋⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣷⡄
⢰⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢷⣄⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⡶⠛⢁⣠⡴⠞⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿
⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠓⠶⠶⠦⠶⠶⣚⣫⡥⠶⠚⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿
⠈⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⡤⠴⠖⠚⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣴⡿⠃
⠀⠈⠛⣷⣦⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣶⡶⠾⠿⠟⠿⠿⠿⠶⣶⣶⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣤⣶⠶⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀
>>ACLU legal director Ben Wizner warns that Donald Trump’s war on dissent endangers the First Amendment
ACLU is feckless with the warning and the endangering
The former director of the Maine chapter of the ACLU, Shenna Bellows (D), is currently the Pine Tree State’s SoS.
Under Bellows’ watch, hundreds of election ballots mysteriously ended up in the hands of a private citizen instead of the intended election board.
In 2024, Bellows removed DJT from the Republican primary ballot until a scotus decision compelled the state to reverse that action by Bellows.
7:22 - The civil servants getting fired and soldiers being kicked out of the military for refusing the Covid shot, and the mass censorship of millions of Americans on social media for saying that just maybe the pandemic didn't start at a Chinese farmer's market, are "routine" and common to every president.
This guy isn't just disingenuous, he's actively making excuses for one of the biggest violations of American's civil liberties in the republic's history.
The ACLU has become anti-civil liberties in a certain (D)irection. This is true fascism.
Must (D)efend The Narrative
ACLU chapters around the country SUED schools to force children to wear masks and stick needles in their arm.
I don't care if you think masks worked or not. I don't care if you think vaccinations worked or not. If you think those "good things" are so good that you can FORCE citizens to do them, you are not on the side of Civil Liberty and you should abandon the moniker.
Again this isn't just that they hypocritically stayed silent while their buddies on the left bullied children in school. They actively joined in the hazing. If this asshat Wizner had any principle, he would spend at least some token breaths clearing his throat and admitting that they were wrong.
But he won't.
The ACLU was trying to reduce the number of bears in trunks. Reluctantly and strategically.
Yeah, the ACLU completely lost me when they pulled that bullshit. As far as I’m currently concerned, fuck them.
I am old enough to remember when the ACLU was against vaccine mandates for nurses during the Swine Flu pandemic.
The answer is no, the ACLU serves only one master, which isn't "civil liberties".
9:42—Have Americans become more comfortable with censorship?9:42—Have Americans become more comfortable with censorship?
*Looks at the 4.5 years of COVID hysteria and the ACLU's response to it*
Yes, very.
Oh, if you think the ACLU can serve conservatives and progressives, I submit not:
Civil liberties are at their most vulnerable at times of crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. As with wars, political strife, economic downfalls, and natural disasters, it’s all too easy for governmental and other seats of power to declare civil liberties a luxury.
Indeed, with you there, ACLU!
But not on our watch. The ACLU has been fighting for civil liberties for 100 years through crises of national, state, and local proportions.
Awesome, so what's the plan?
In keeping with this legacy, the ACLU of Southern California is demanding that those liberties framed by the U.S. and state constitutions be upheld during the current pandemic.
Nice, what are you asking for?
Attorneys, organizers, and others from the ACLU SoCal are reaching out to numerous agencies to remind them that we’re counting on them to protect the health and safety of all Californians while never losing sight of our rights and civil liberties.
Uh, hmm... *looks around* why is this beginning to look like a 'balancing act'? But what about mask mandates and forced vacc...
This includes due process rights, protections for vulnerable populations such as incarcerated people, and equal access to care regardless of immigration status.
*facepalm*
In a campaign aimed at reducing jails population, the ACLU SoCal has asked the district attorneys, public defenders offices, and presiding judges to eliminate or greatly reduce bail amounts. We also urged that court proceedings be modified to reduce the number of in-person appearances.
So, letting people out of prison is the priority here?
The ACLU SoCal — in coalition with the ACLU affiliates in Northern California and San Diego & Imperial Counties — reached out to the California Department of Public Health in regard to the state’s homeless shelters. These facilities, far too-often plagued with severely unhygienic and unsafe conditions, are especially in danger of COVID-19 outbreaks.
You oughta see the conditions outside the shelters, you ACLU cunts!
FYI, for those who don't live in an bluer-than-blue-found-in-nature-blue city, this is a clever game used by the Homelessness Industrial Complex to keep the homeless on the street.
The ACLU is an active participant in that destabilizing Marxist dream: Keep the homeless on the street in horrific conditions at all costs. It's more useful that way if we're going to destroy the nation-state, break up the nuclear family and bring about the end of the late-stage capitalist order, thus bringing about The End of History.
1. Target a respected institution
2. Kill & clean it
3. Wear it as a skin suit, while demanding the respect it was given
#Democrats
Same reason hamas starves the palistienians
Thanks for the reminder. ACLU is pretty much irredeemable at this point.
Here are the major priorities of the ACLU:
Immigrants
trans
abortion
Speech isn't even fucking listed. Fuck off ACLU.
Can it? Of course it can - it used to.
But those in it today do not want to do so anymore.
I'm old enough to remember Skokie. This is not your grandfather's ACLU. Trust me on this.
Why is it different? The aclu defended only socialists then
Socialists, National Socialists... the list is long.
Point taken.
More ACLU priorities:
These people are not about civil rights. They're just a roving agency racializing the American polity through lawsuits and other actions which have nothing to do with civil rights at all. Reparations are definitionally a violation of the rights of the citizenry. It's a collective punishment against the citizens of the country.
Two outta three in this case is worse!
Does anyone actually take the ACLU seriously? They have squashed dissent more than most organizations by pushing everything left. Were they not a large part of the woke and D.I.E. ideology?