Jeffrey Singer: Get Government Out of Health Care
Longtime surgeon and Cato Institute fellow Jeffrey Singer argues that government overreach in health care undermines patient autonomy.
Jeffrey Singer, a Cato Institute fellow and longtime surgeon, argues that government overreach in health care undermines patient autonomy, which should be the guiding principle in medical decision making. Drawing from historical examples and personal experience, he critiques licensing laws, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) drug approval monopoly, and Certificate of Need (CON) regulations as protectionist measures that limit competition and innovation. Singer contends that private institutions—like insurers, hospitals, and certification boards—already create strong incentives for safety and quality, making many government controls unnecessary.
Reason's Nick Gillespie and Singer also explore complex topics like end-of-life choice, trans youth health care, and antibiotic regulation, emphasizing the balance between personal freedom and legitimate public health concerns.
This interview was recorded at The Reason Speakeasy, a monthly event in New York City that doubles as a live taping of The Reason Interview. Go here for more information on upcoming Reason events.
Subscribe to the new YouTube channel for The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie here.
0:00 — Introduction
0:50 — Singer's medical career
3:55 — Your Body, Your Health Care
8:40 — Government interference in your health care
14:23 — CON laws
20:00 — Licensing and credentialing rackets
29:48 — The FDA's drug approval monopoly
31:30 — The thalidomide scandal
34:11 — Off-label drug prescriptions
37:00 — FDA approval for naloxone and Plan B
40:20 — The American Medical Association's push for licensing
43:00 — RFK Jr.: reformer or madman?
45:05 — The food pyramid and other government follies
45:57 — Intersex infants and trans health care
50:09 — Right to die and patient autonomy
- Video Editor: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yup.
Whoa! TWO articles in one week arguing for reduced government meddling. But "trans-youth"? You lost me right there. You may as well discuss "flat earth youth" healthcare. I don't give a shit what they believe or if they want to cross dress, but once you start "treating" them for it as youths, you've lost me. They can get their own treatment as adults.
Fire KMW.
Get out of DC.
Publish libertarian content.
Bitch if they do, bitch if they don't.
Trump defenders hate Cato, which makes everything this guy says wrong.
Bitch if they do, bitch if they don't.
Sarc is just a bitch. Period.
If Trump started getting the government out of healthcare, Reason would scream, "You're doing it wrong! You can't just... get the government out of healthcare!"
Alternatively, the other side of that critique (like we saw with deportations) is "Why aren't they getting out of healthcare faster?! Why even bother if it's this slow?!"
If Suderman writes the article, it'll be "What will Trump replace it with?!!"
My mom loves Cato. Shops there all the time.
Healthcare providers want government money in the healthcare sector. How else can they enjoy earnings that vastly outpase the rest of the economy?
Why does my local hospital get to claim non profit status? They should join Harvard in the cry me a river pile.
It's no coincidence that the two sectors where costs vastly outpace the rest of the economy are heavily subsidized by government. Those being health care and education.
^Well Said +1000000000000000000000........
"Why does my local hospital get to claim non profit status? "
That is a very odd question, but I would assume it is because they are operating as a nonprofit organization (NPO), since most hospitals do.
NPO has nothing to do with earning, govt. subsidies, or even the ability to make a profit (even a very large one). It has everything to do with dividends and ownership. NPOs must use any profit in support of its core mission (more or less), which can include things like investments for the future and expansion. They simply cannot pay out to any sort of owners or stockholders a part of that profit (NPOs do not have "owners", they are controlled by a board).
You really don't want to hospitals to lose NPO status. Not only would the extra taxes raise prices of all medical care (just like all taxes, added costs get passed to consumer), but what little transparency that does exist within the hospital system is almost entirely due to NPO reporting and transparency requirements.
just like all taxes, added costs get passed to consumer
Not true. Trump's tariffs don't. They're magic.
Amazing how you keep lying about the arguments of others lol.
Dumb, ignorant, pathalogical liar?
We are asking you to show the dorect correlation. Can you find the signal? Do you understand boad inflation is a monetary issue? At one point you did.
Explain bidens 21% inflation over 3 years.
You see, Sarc is a drunken, retarded, leftist cunt.
What is this? Sarc trying to shoehorn Trump into a conversation not about Trump. I've never seen that before... except for every fucking comments section since I've been here.
I'm going to ask until I'm blue in the face (or fingers, as the case may be) for a transcript of the interviews and podcasts. The technology exists, Reason. Use it!
Indeed. I can read the transcript for an hour long interview in a few minutes. And I can do that in a noisy environment.
" . . . government overreach in health care undermines patient autonomy."
Well, that was the point, after all.
The last thing the socialists want is autonomous citizens.
Great Article. Nice to see Reason still has some Libertarian principles that go beyond their TDS.
Even if RFK turns out to want to replace one authoritarian regime with another just as authoritarian, the shakeup is worthwhile because it will undermine the assumptions behind support for authoritarianism in the field. That is, if people see that one orientation is just as arbitrary as the other, good will tend to flow from that realization.