Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Can Mark Cuban Make Prescriptions Affordable Again?
Cuban's Cost Plus Drugs project brings a bit of free market flair to the health care industry, but the lack of meaningful price signals is only part of the problem.

Why are prescription drugs so expensive in the United States?
"Drug prices in this country are so high because there is zero transparency in the system, and when there's zero transparency in a market, there is no way for it to be efficient," says Mark Cuban, the serial entrepreneur, investor on Shark Tank, and guest on the first episode of the second season of Why We Can't Have Nice Things.
When a market is inefficient, adds Cuban, "people learn very quickly how to take advantage of those inefficiencies to their own profit, and that's exactly what's happened in the health care and pharmacy side."
Cuban is trying to do something about the lack of transparency in the prescription drug market. In 2022, he launched CostPlusDrugs.com, a website that offers low prices and direct shipping for hundreds of pharmaceuticals and generics. By showing their markup—a standard 15 percent on everything—and encouraging consumers to make their purchases without going through insurance plans, Cuban's project is attempting to inject a bit of capitalism into a health care market that sorely needs it.
It's the perfect story to kick off the new season of Why We Can't Have Nice Things, which focuses on how bad regulations and anticompetitive rules are making Americans poorer and sicker. Over the next six weeks, this limited-run Reason podcast series will dive into some of the acute problems with the American health care system, examining how poor policy making is keeping doctors from treating patients and blocking patients from getting needed treatment.
The lack of transparency in drug pricing is one of those problems. Price signals are essential to a functioning market—but the prescription drug market seems designed to hide those signals as much as possible.
The result is higher prices for everyone. For a lot of Americans, those prices are a source of economic hardship. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 21 percent of adults say they have not filled a prescription because of the cost. Meanwhile, about one in 10 adults say they have cut pills in half or skipped doses of medicine in the last year because of the cost.
Cuban's newest venture could be part of the solution. A Vanderbilt University Medical Center study published last year found that the federal government could save taxpayers up to $2.15 billion annually if insurers operating in the Medicare prescription drug plans purchased seven generic oncology drugs at the prices obtained by Cost Plus Drugs.
More transparent pricing would have a bigger impact if more Americans were in control of their own health care spending, argues Michael Cannon, the director of health policy for the Cato Institute.
"You can show them the prices, but they're not going to care unless it's their money on the line," Cannon says. Unfortunately, close to 90 percent of all health care spending in the United States comes from the government or from private insurance companies, leaving individuals with little influence.
"As a result, we get a health sector that doesn't serve the needs of consumers and patients," says Cannon. "We get a health sector that serves the needs of employers and of the government and whoever controls the government, which ends up being the health care industry."
Further reading for this week's episode:
"Mark Cuban Has a New Job: Working at an Online Discount Pharmacy," by Joseph Walker at The Wall Street Journal
Recovery: A Guide to Reforming the U.S. Health Sector, by Michael Cannon
The War on Prices, by Ryan Bourne
Pharmacy Benefit Managers: History, Business Practices, Economics, and Policy, by David Hyman, Ge Bai, and T. Joseph Mattingly II
Overcharged: Why Americans Pay Too Much for Health Care, by David Hyman and Charles Silver
Written by Eric Boehm; produced and edited by Hunt Beaty; fact-checking by Anthony Wallace.
- Producer: Hunt Beaty
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The primary costs of generics stems from difficulty in FDA approvals for generic drug makers opening new manufacturing sites. Cuban on X has supported the regulatory framework of this control.
Of course he has. Any brains he has don’t appear to translate to politics. He’s just largely a mouthy jackass who supports some of the worst democrat pablum.
Cuban is a fool and demagogue. The high prescription prices in this country are because of a couple of reasons. Over regulation driving up research and development costs is one. Mandatory pricing in other countries like Canada which force the companies to recoup their costs on the American taxpayers back is another.
If that tool gets his way and artificially caps prices it will destroy the incentive for companies to develop new drugs. Who will drop billions and years on something if there is no way to get that money back?
"Who will drop billions and years on something if there is no way to get that money back?"
Every democrat ever elected?
When the Dems take all pharmaceutical research to the Ivy Leagues (as a grants jobs program for votes)
Ha! Got me.
It's also a problem that the government has pushed it's nose into the companies as far as they have overseeing everything. And that the FDA gets the majority of it's budget from the pharmaceutical companies. I guess no one has made the connection of the Gov under Obama taking over the student loan industry and the subsequent skyrocketing cost of education.
"I guess no one has made the connection of the Gov under Obama taking over the student loan industry and the subsequent skyrocketing cost of education."
Lots of people have. I've also talked about how lottery-funded scholarships drove prices higher, too, and also led to the "luxury student housing" complexes near universities.
The sky-high price of drugs under patent covers not only the cost of research, approval, and manufacture of the drug but also the losses of research into failed new drugs.
If those costs can not be recovered, then only those new drugs already near approval will come to market and research on new drugs will stop. We will have cheap drugs but, after a few years, no new ones.
Here is the problem: Those costs probably wouldn't be recoverable in a free market.
The real problem is that health-care consumers are not price-sensitive. They are used to insurance paying whatever their costs, as long as they can get a Doctor to sign off on its necessity.
In a functional market, a pharmaceutical company would contemplate a drug and say, "Is there a market for this? Would they pay enough for it to support the R&D? Would they switch to the higher price from alternatives?" And then they would make a decision to bring the drug to market. But today, none of that price sensitivity enters into buying decisions, and so Pharmaceutical companies are incentivized to just make drugs and send reps out into the field to bug doctors into prescribing them.
If consumers were price sensitive, Pharma companies would have incentive to develop drugs that are cheaper, and to streamline their R&D costs. They would be looking for drugs that help transition people off of long term medication because most consumers would be unwilling to pay long term for these drugs if they had to actually pay out of pocket.
Consider the unregulated electronics market. The TV hanging on your wall has decreased in real price over decades, not through clever "Cost Plus" marketing gimmicks, but because dozens of suppliers and manufacturers have looked to find thousands of ways to source and produce their products cheaper. This market environment has created a place where you can get a good tv for a couple hundred bucks or less, or spend $10k on a monster with all the bells and whistles. You cannot command and control an economy into such dynamism. It requires starting with returning choice to the individual.
No Overt, you just have to be ‘joyful’ to fix things. Cackling incoherently and inappropriately helps too. Thats all it takes, and details don’t matter.
If Cuban is ‘joyful’ enough it will work.
Seriously. Cost plus helps increase transparency but very few are going to ignore their insurance and buy direct, but more importantly, as any government contractor knows, cost plus doesn't necessarily give any incentive to lower, you know, the actual cost to produce something.
The difference between the TV and drug markets is that if the TV goes on the fritz, you just go and buy a new one. If the drug is bad, people get very sick, or die. Should people gamble with their lives if a drug is adulterated? Hence the regulations found in 21 CFR 211. How would you know how a drug is made without standards and inspections?
We’ll have cheap drugs with shortages, like the baby formula thing. Research grant jobs are already out of control in the Ivy leagues. The Dems want all research moved to the federal government as a jobs program. The young EConOMiST girl Zach and Liz interviewed said it out loud. Inflation is okay because the government created jobs!
It’s not like there’s medical journals shutting down or anything, oh wait..
https://www.wsj.com/science/academic-studies-research-paper-mills-journals-publishing-f5a3d4bc
Also have to build in the price of inevitable lawsuits and class-action settlements if a drug is not 100% perfectly effective and has absolutely zero side-effects.
Eric Boehm is why we can't have a nice libertarian party. I have watched his degeneration from an idealistic libertarian to a technocratic authoritarian over night. Here is a perfect example of how he just accepts nonsense because it has "OFFICIAL SCIENCE!(TM)" stamped on the front:
"A Vanderbilt University Medical Center study published last year found that the federal government could save taxpayers up to $2.15 billion annually if insurers operating in the Medicare prescription drug plans purchased seven generic oncology drugs at the prices obtained by Cost Plus Drugs."
This is absurd and only a person who doesn't grasp supply and demand would think this is true. If you really think some generic drug company is going to suddenly ramp up supply to meet a billion dollars of new demand, you are insane.
Further, Insurance Companies don't want to lower drug costs. They are limited by Obamacare (I love that my spell-check doesn't object to that word) as to how much profit margin they can make. The only way they can increase profits is by increasing the base price of their expenses. So what you will see is them not reducing expenditures but spending it elsewhere.
And for the record, Mark Cuban is a crony capitalist of the highest order. He learned all the wrong lessons about rent-seeking from Musk and has figured out that if he just says the right things about Team Blue, his sun will never set. And like so many of the team blue folks, he is likely a sexual predator and certainly enabled it in his toxic sports organization, all while professing his compassion as a smoke screen.
"If you really think some generic drug company is going to suddenly ramp up supply to meet a billion dollars of new demand WITHOUT ALSO RAISING PRICES, you are insane."
Sorry, fixed it.
Some of these VCs are fine with price controls. See Reid Hoffman on the All-In podcast.
The good kind of fascism.
"Why We Can't Have Nice Things:.."
Because the peasantry in the US are not entitled to nice things according to our obvious betters who rule over us.
After all, doesn't it make sense those who burden us with unnecessary bureaucracies, onerous taxes and laws that restrict our socioeconomic status should be better off than us?
Why are prescription drugs so expensive in the United States?
Check this book out, especially if you think "Medicare for All" is going to save us: Overcharged: Why Americans Pay Too Much for Health Care.
Imagine the grocery market once all the prices are controlled by the Harris/Walz Administration...
Don't imagine. Just go visit Caracas or Havana. And go beyond the Potemkin tourist sections.
No, thanks.
I have a hard enough time sleeping as it is.
O/T. Figure id post this since all search engine results place this at the bottom of this isn’t happening. 120 videos and lender private investigation attached at bottom. Pedophilia trafficking included. Search results on this:
This isn’t happening
This is a figment if your imagination - Governor Jared Polis -Democrat
Aurora Police- this is not happening it’s fake news
Aurora Police during gang gunfight- “We’re not coming”
Colorado residents are hysterical about a nothing burger
Residents (living in previously vacant apartments) say it’s not happening
Not happening
Racist right wing rhetoric promotes conspiracy theory on newcomers
No- gangs have not taken over apartment buildings
Gang members have been arrested in connection with Aurora apartment takeover (in Colorado that means if they’re sentenced to 20 years, they serve 6 months btw)
Here’s the banks private investigation:
https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/colorado-law-firm-report-claims-venezuelan-gang-stranglehold-apartments-takeover-began-2023/
Please spread this on social media before it’s memory holed
difficult to take him seriously even when he's serious.
'Why are prescription drugs so expensive in the United States?'
Even if we can overcome market distortions, the realties include that people see value in drugs and are willing to pay, and some drugs are really, really expensive to make.
Can Mark Cuban Make Prescriptions Affordable Again?
As long as the hires the right combination of BIPOC/LGBTQI2MAP+ 'cause diversity is his strength.
The "high cost" of pharmaceuticals is not the problem. The problem is the obesity epidemic which is killing America and American's insistence that just 1 pill will fix everything so they don't have to stop the 2 Whopper lunch followed by sitting in a chair 6hrs watching Netflix.
Problem isn't this lack of "meaningful price signals" thing. It's that the FedGov grants patents which allows the holders to extort monopoly prices. see https://www.stephankinsella.com/own-ideas/
Mark Cuban's something of an illusion. He mostly sells generics, which are generally cheap already. It's like opening a grocery store that only sells white label products. Sure, they might have the best price on Kola, but there's no Coke or Pepsi to be found. He sells very few brand name and specialty drugs, which are much more expensive, and would greatly cut down on his ability to demagogue everything.