Kat Murti: How To End the Drug War for Good
The head of Students for Sensible Drug Policy clarifies the misconceptions around decriminalization, safe injection sites, and whether Trump or Biden is better on drug policy.
- Video Editor: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another crazy chick.
Crazy and stupid.
How the fuck is this not the biggest story on Reason today?
DHS Advisory Made Up Of US Intel Spooks Is Ordered To SHUT DOWN
Is it because it was a group of Trumpy Trumpists who successfully shut down a shadow CIA agency?
"Is it because it was a group of Trumpy Trumpists who successfully shut down a shadow CIA agency?"
No. There was not a single mention of AI, Ron DiSantis, food trucks, or sex workers in that video. The issues raised are simply of no interest to libertarians.
In their defense, the epilogue to the story is "And nothing else happened."
As an aside, the last time I saw a woman like Jessica Burbank in a sleeveless leather top with makeup lines as bad as hers, I married her and had 3 kids.
Someone at The Hill has an interesting hiring process. I'd like to know more.
Giant Meteor 2024 has a plan to solve this. Rock the vote.
Or should it be iron-nickel the vote?
In the political space, everyone is in Trump's orbit.
Hoping for a meteoric rise in the polls but currently has an astronomically low chance of winning the election.
A true rising star?
In the political space, noone can hear you (R) scream.
I am currently favoring Giant Meteor so far.
This woman's hair is of a color found in nature and she has no visible face piercings. Are we supposed to take her seriously?
Remember the last time we legalized something under the proposition that what an individual did in their own home was none of the public’s business?
Well, it's the public’s business now, whether they like it or not.
Cheers!
This is true. As soon as people learn that an action has ever been subject to government policy, it's "in play" forever. The existence of constitutional provisions means people can adopt constitutions with whatever content they decide.
The question shouldn't be "should X be legalized?". The question needs to be whether the laws are morally and constitutionally justified in the first place. At the very least, federal prohibition fails on the constitutional question.
And who does the Constitution designate as the competent authority to interpret the Constitution? That's right! The courts!
And did the courts find these laws Constitutional?
Yeah, they kinda did.
So, where do you appeal when the authority entrusted with interpreting the Constitution (by the Constitution itself, no less!), interprets those laws as Constitutional?
Unfortunately, we don't all get to have our own personal Constitution to interpret as we see fit. We have an authority that's tasked with interpreting it. And if that authority rules a thing as Constitutional, then, by definition, it is.
Pack The Court until it agrees with my personal constitution.
The question shouldn’t be “should X (formerly known as Twitter) be legalized?”.
Drug prohibition is immoral because it's coercive.
I didn’t LTTFI, did anyone bring up the fact that the federal government has no authority to ban drugs?
TL;DL yet, but...there's no such thing as "for good". What has been done once can always be done again.
00:29:30—How to make safe injection sites Work
Progress: We're at least now admitting that they don't work, but will work once these common-sense changes are put in place!
More funding needed!
And the specific part of the piece was laughable. She/They assures us they don't have a pollyanna-esque view but then points right past the "This subway has been operating for X number of days since someone was stabbed in the neck." sign at New York as an example of how well drug abuse is being handled.
Can we lace all drugs with lethal amounts of fentanyl? Then I could get behind the drug legalization movement.
ngl, my first thought from the headline was "Capital punishment for drug crimes."
Which would absolutely work. And be a net positive in the grand scheme.
But, alas, I'm against capital punishment. So... mandatory rehab. And real cold-turkey rehab, not this "weaning" nonsense.
After re-introduced to society, if relapse occurs, life in prison.
Drug war solved.
I think the recent shenanigans on colleges across the West have pretty much killed any credibility that "students" might have had in the first place, which was basically none, since they don't live in the real world anyway.