Kevin Kelly: Excellent Advice for Living From the World's Leading Optimist
Wired's "senior maverick" on his new book of accumulated wisdom, backlash against tech, and why the future still looks bright.

My guest today is Kevin Kelly, one of the original gang of people at Wired magazine back when it was not just reporting on but helping to create digital culture and cyberspace (he remains listed on the masthead as a "senior maverick"). He's a longtime techno-optimist who worked with people like Stewart Brand at the Whole Earth Catalog, Whole Earth Review, and CoEvolution Quarterly and has published a shelf's worth of books such as Out of Control, which helped popularize the idea of emergent orders and self-regulating systems as preferable to traditional, top-down systems of control.
Since 2000, he has published Cool Tools, "which recommends the best/cheapest tools available" and he is one of the people behind a weekly Substack newsletter that suggests interesting gadgets, books, and offerings. He is one of the founders of The Long Now Foundation, which pushes people to think in 10,000-year-long increments, and he maintains a comprehensive database of the writing, art, presentations, blogs, and other material he's generated over the past several decades.
His new book is Excellent Advice for Living: Wisdom I Wish I'd Known Earlier, a collection of 450 aphorisms and insights gleaned from a life spent traveling the globe and at the intersection of technology and culture. We talk about his body of work, how his Christianity informs his scientific beliefs (and vice versa), and not only why he believes optimism wins in the long run but also why he believes it's warranted by the facts on the ground.
Today's sponsor:
- BetterHelp. Are you at your best? Working with a therapist can help you get closer to the best version of you—because when you feel empowered, you're more prepared to take on everything life throws at you. If you're thinking of giving therapy a try, BetterHelp is a great option. It's convenient, flexible, affordable, and entirely online. Just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist, and switch therapists anytime for no additional charge. If you want to live a more empowered life, therapy can get you there. Visit BetterHelp.com/TRI today to get 10 percent off your first month.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just read it.
It’s a quick read, and could have been done as a few blog posts or something similar. I think Kelly might have published it in book form primarily because he is a connoisseur of well-made books with good typography, etc.
This guy is a bigger virtue signaling retard than you. No wonder you read his book.
https://muckrack.com/kevin2kelly/articles
Amazing! I’ve been making $85 every hour since i started freelancing over the internet half a year ago… I work from home several hours daily and do basic work i get from this company that i stumbled upon online… I am very happy to share this work opportunity to you… It’s definetly the best job i ever had…Check it out here…… http://Www.Easywork7.com
Wired's "senior maverick" on his new book of accumulated wisdom, backlash against tech, and why the future still looks bright.
That backlash against tech wouldn't have anything to do with Tech's backlash against free speech?
No, it wouldn't. Since tech is supporting unprecedented levels of free speech.
Don’t you ever feel shame lying like that?
That would require him to feel.
Lolwut?
Even after the backlash tech is still full on censoring viewpoints.
Dumb and/or dishonest?
True. Elon Musk is shaking up the media by showing how free speech is done.
https://twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1674080105696567297?t=HIsUxE2E9cYK0udCUxaaoQ&s=19
I am by no means the smartest person in the room… But I’m not the dumbest either. This pivot from the White House is shockingly, brazenly, corruptly, dishonest.
It’s no longer @POTUS has “never spoken to [his] son about his overseas business dealings”.
Now it’s “the president was not in business with his son”.
Of course, even this shocking, brazen, corrupt claim is also a demonstrable lie.
[Link]
I do like his term "artificial smartness" instead of calling what we have 'AI'. And the AI industry keeps kicking terminology around. In the 80s and the 90s they called them "expert systems" which I actually thought was a decent term. Then for some reason we got back to calling it AI.
An "expert system" is a particular kind of artificial intelligence system. "Expert systems" was never a general label for all types of artificial intelligence.
https://twitter.com/greg_price11/status/1674081676773797888?t=-hn03INfGkL5st77svPRxA&s=19
I thought this was a paraphrase at first but, no, that's the actual text of the bill.
Michigan Democrats want to put people in jail for 5 years if they make someone "feel terrorized, frightened, or threatened" with their words.
[Link]
About time! As a collateral cousin of the Vanderbilts, I'm sick and tired of hearing or reading attacks on the so-called "robber barons."
Optimism is just a lack of information.
Wow. Never seen C Edward Koop out of uniform before.
I don't know who that is, but the first thing I thought is he had a significant resemblance to C Everett Koop.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/were-midst-coup-martin-armstrong-warns-neocons-will-rig-2024-election
Armstrong also says the neocons will try to start a war before the 2024 election so Biden will win because a wartime president has never lost an election. Armstrong says the cheating will be necessary because the real poll numbers for Biden are in the single digits and not the 40% approval ratings the Lying Legacy Media tells you. Armstrong contends Biden’s approval number is still stuck at 9.5% with his deadly accurate Socrates computer program, but the big reason for Biden and his crew to worry is the real inflation number.
Armstrong says, “Inflation is subsiding a little bit, but it is basically still over 26%.”
Armstrong says Biden’s approval numbers are so low and inflation is so high that they have to have war with Russia.
I've made that point in the past. Biden can't win a fair election without a war. And the way the neocons have engineered the Ukraine fiasco the timing couldn't be better.
It isnt the neocons. It is the security and diplomatic state and think tanks like The Atlantic Council which courts both dems and neocons.
Madonna ded
“I’m not dead yet.”
https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1674184903716487169?t=SJvx0D3iDhS7vmmmq0YlNg&s=19
Mother of God they kicked out 44 but kept 4 to do their landscaping roofing, and painting.
They lived up to the meme of NE libs 1000% and they sincerely believe this is owning the cons
[Link]
It really is a parody in real life.
Durham Ignored His Assignment
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2023/06/28/durham-ignored-his-assignment/
Barr's charging document
“The Special Counsel is authorized to investigate whether any federal official, employee, or any other person or entity violated the law.”
Durham was not only tasked with investigating any federal official/employee. He was, in fact, authorized to investigate “any other person or entity” he found participated in the conspiracy—inside of government or not.
“[I]n connection with the intelligence, counter-intelligence, or law-enforcement activities.”
Durham was not limited to looking into strictly law-enforcement investigations but also all intelligence and counter-intelligence activities. Please note also that it does not say “of the United States government.” So the activities of individuals and entities—be they private or connected to foreign governments—would also fall within his scope.
“[D]irected at the 2016 presidential campaigns, individuals associated with those campaigns.“
Notice that it says campaigns—plural. So activities related to the 2016 presidential campaign of Secretary Hillary Clinton were every bit as much within his scope as that of President Donald Trump.
“[A]nd individuals associated with the administration of President Donald J. Trump“
Durham was specifically authorized to investigate intelligence, counter-intelligence, or law-enforcement activities of anyone who worked in the Trump administration (i.e., any Executive Branch official or employee for the entirety of President Trump’s term in office).
“[I]ncluding but not limited to Crossfire Hurricane and the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III.”
While the charging document specifically tasked Durham to look into the activities of the FBI’s ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ and the Special Counsel investigation of Robert Mueller by name, it made it clear Durham was not expected to limit himself to those investigations.
“If the Special Counsel [Durham] believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from his investigation of these matters.”
Durham's interpretation
“We have not interpreted the Order as directing us to investigate the Department’s handling of matters associated with the investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.”
Right off the bat, Durham states he has no intention of looking into the DOJ’s handling of the Clinton private email server investigation. Durham was explicitly tasked with investigating “law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns”. That would certainly include the Clinton classified email investigation. This was the entire reason the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax was concocted in the first place—both to distract the public’s attention from Clinton’s mishandling of classified information and assist the FBI in covering it up. It is simply inconceivable any serious effort to investigate Spygate could be done without looking into the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton email investigation.
“For a review of those matters, see Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of Justice, ‘A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election’ (June 2018).”
In order to justify this glaring omission, Durham instead points to a previous report prepared by Michael Horowitz and the DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) in June 2018. Let’s not forget Durham was asked to begin his investigation into these matters in May 2019 while still U.S. Attorney for Connecticut. This following a review by the newly appointed Attorney General (Bill Barr) into issues with those investigations—nearly a year after IG Horowitz issued his report. So the OIG report clearly was not considered sufficient at the time of Durham’s original appointment.
We must also point out that OIG is not a criminal investigative agency. OIG is a creation of Congress that acts as a fact-finding organization to assist Congress in its constitutional oversight role. OIG does not even have subpoena power to compel former or non-government employees to submit to questioning. By punting the Clinton email investigation to OIG, Durham has now ensured there will never be any meaningful review of that investigation by any law enforcement agency.
“We also have not interpreted the Order as directing us to consider the handling of the investigation into President Trump opened by the FBI on May 16, 2017. See FBI EC from Counter-intelligence, Re: [Redacted] Foreign Agents Registration Act – Russia; Sensitive Investigative Matter (May 16, 2017). (The following day, the Deputy Attorney General appointed Special Counsel Mueller “to investigate Russian interference with the 2016 presidential election and related matters.” See I Mueller Report at 11-12 (describing the authorities given to Special Counsel Mueller).”
This is the most bewildering passage in the entire Durham Report. It’s hard to fathom how they could bring themselves to put it down on paper, and this is what most stunned Rep. Gaetz in the hearing. The Durham Team actually said they interpreted the order as not directing them to investigate the actions of the Mueller Special Counsel Investigation, even though it says precisely the exact opposite.
https://twitter.com/alx/status/1674204228682764290?t=3A6bvKIuswt9LhkrhgIjyA&s=19
PAUL RYAN: “It's a disaster if we nominate Trump...but he could win. I’m for anyone not named Trump”
[Video]
https://twitter.com/RealEJAntoni/status/1674125652511936524?t=6k9TFRexm1PqD4tbEbJ9Jg&s=19
What is #Bidenomics? In a word, failure. Talking points aside, here's a thread of nothing but the facts on how the American people have been impacted...
[Thread, links]
Good news: Glenn Greenwald takes Republicans to task.
Bad news: It's not Ron DeSantis.
I was thinking about Promethean Transformations when I ran across this.
'So FBI Leadership Knew It?': Chip Roy Grills John Durham About Steele Dossier
I don’t trust a man with a beard and no mustache. Taint natural.
Well, if you're Amish you wouldn't want to be confused with a military man by growing a mustache.
Otherwise, it's ridiculous, of course.
I was with him until "The public owns your face." What????
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/