Student Debt Forgiveness Folly
Plus: The editors field a listener question on abortion.

In this week's The Reason Roundtable, editors Matt Welch, Peter Suderman, and Nick Gillespie are joined by Associate Editor Liz Wolfe as they criticize President Joe Biden's recently announced student loan forgiveness program.
2:07: Biden's executive order to cancel student debt.
29:33: Weekly Listener Question:
Why is the abortion debate within libertarianism treated so dismissively by everyone on The Reason Roundtable? Most other topics are approached with an evenhandedness that attempts to at least acknowledge that those who disagree with the panelists are doing so in good faith and are at least attempting to be reasonable. It's not surprising that everyone on The Roundtable is pro-choice. But why can't you all acknowledge your disagreement with pro-life libertarians is over fundamental values that libertarianism can't resolve? The way you approach the subject makes your own colleagues like Liz Wolfe into pariah libertarians who have no place in the movement. Pro-life libertarians begin with the premise that life starts at conception and that all humans have human rights. Further, in this line of thinking, the most foundational right (if any rights exist at all) is the right to not be killed without just cause. And so we conclude that the right of a baby to not be killed outweighs a woman's right to not be pregnant or not to provide the sustenance a growing baby needs to live in her womb. It is perfectly rational for someone else to say that he values a woman's autonomy more than the rights of a potential human life (or even an actual human life), but these two positions are irreconcilable. Why does everyone on The Roundtable go around masquerading as if their position on abortion is based on pure reason and science and the only acceptable libertarian position instead of acknowledging that it really boils down to values and you don't value a baby's life before she is born more than the mother's autonomy?
49:58: This week's cultural recommendations.
Mentioned in this podcast:
"TGIF: Debts Forgiven and Debts Forgotten," by Nick Gillespie
"Emma Camp: Student Loan Forgiveness Is Bad News and Bad Policy," by Peter Suderman
"The Student Loan Debate Isn't Just About Money. It's About the Experiences Students Like Me Sacrificed." by Fiona Harrigan
"Forgiving Student Debt Without Abolishing the Federal Loan Program Is Morally Wrong," by Robby Soave
"Debate: Forgive Student Debt?" by Intelligence Squared Debates
"Get Ready for the Post-Roe Sex Police!" by Nick Gillespie
Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.
Today's sponsor:
Looking for your next podcast? Check out The Political Orphanage. Host Andrew Heaton is one of the funny guys in Reason TV videos—you may have seen him in "Libertarian PBS," "Game of Thrones: Libertarian Edition," or "Desperate Mayors Compete for Amazon HQ2."
The Political Orphanage is designed for people who don't feel at home in the Republican or Democratic Parties. Rather than explaining issues as a slap fight between Red Team and Blue Team, Heaton looks for the underlying problems to big issues and cracks jokes along the way. This month, Heaton flew to Berlin to interview a historian about Nazi economics and whether Hitler was a socialist or a capitalist. Over the next two weeks, he's going to talk to comedians about if social justice is a religion. And later this month, he's doing a special on what might happen in the event of nuclear war.
The Political Orphanage looks for the basic concepts affecting politics and explains them, so you can make up your own mind instead of just choosing a team to hate. It's a funny, wonky, nonpartisan show with cool guests, and we think you'll enjoy it. So check out The Political Orphanage.
Audio production by Ian Keyser
Assistant production by Hunt Beaty
Music: "Angeline," by The Brothers Steve
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's not surprising that everyone on The Roundtable is pro-choice.
A libertarian has to be pro-choice.
A person can be morally opposed to abortion but once you advocate using the police power of the state to imprison the mother/doctor you give up your libertarian credentials.
I know the Peanuts don't agree.
As wrong as SPB is here, there is no sense engaging him.
A few years back SPB posted kiddy porn to this site, and his initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead SPB keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get him to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
You Alex Jones QAnon Trump trash lie without conscience.
Nope, you’re the liar here and the link proves it. Anyone can (and should) read the thread and see it for themselves.
It's completely vague.
I notice how you conservatives can take a vague comment and extrapolate all kind of nonsensical shit.
Like "BIG GUY 10%"
You wingnuts saw that and began jumping around like howler monkeys.
What does it mean? Is it a bar tab? Who is the big guy?
It is why none of your "scandals" ever work out. They are all tiny dust particles in your 8-bit brains.
It's completely vague.
The link you posted wasn't vague. You were trying to make a point about how easy it is to find illegal things on the dark web, and so you posted a link to no-shit child pornography.
Like Overt, I don't understand why you thought people were going to forget that.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (am-03) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
Right, SPB just had all of his posts scrubbed by admins for no reason at all. You can see at the link, how all those posts were there one day, and gone the next. But for some reason that is "vague"
Keeping in mind that the number of people who have been banned from this site in the last 20 years can be counted on one hand, and doesn't include the Holocaust denier.
Hey, I've been trying for years and I can't get snuffed out. You can mute me, but I'm still here...
“I can't get snuffed out.”
Maybe posting links to snuff films?
Sniff films!!! Make that SNIFF films, dammit! R Mac LOVES sniffing the ground-up, desiccated poop of bunnies and of dust bunnies, know ass dust-bunny-dust!!! Ashes to ashes, R Macs and other asses to asses, and R Mac's ass is brain-control-locked-addicted to lick desiccated poop of bunnies!!! To HELL with Playboy Bunnies... Bring out the razor and the mirror, pink champagne on ice, and let's DO some poop of dust-bunny-dust, says R Mac! More-more-MORE, always MORE poop of dust-bunny-dust, until R Mac can't be trusted, the cops are disgusted, and he's BUSTED!!!
(Have YOU ever seen R Mac spaced out and gone wild on poop of dust-bunny-dust?!?! I have! It's enough to make you go and "groom" your teeth bacteria to become AIDS viruses! This will end civilization ass we know it, if we don't watch out! WAKE UP, dammit, Spamerica!)
Did they even scrub that psycho Mary Stack or her White Indian handle?
Nice work.
And since the main topic is Biden's student loan proposal, don't forget to mention that people who are not convinced it's a good idea should blame George W. Bush.
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
Biden's student loan proposal
Nah, Biden's loan proposal is uniquely stupid. Economically that is.
Politically it is akin to Trump insisting to sign all those COVID relief checks.
TRUMP GAVE ME $1400 FELLERS! I'M VOTIN' FER HIM AGIN!
We're fucked. Both parties suck.
"A libertarian has to be pro-choice."
Which person gets the choice, Shrike? Do they hold a vote?
A person can be morally opposed to abortion but once you advocate using the police power of the state to imprison the mother/doctor you give up your libertarian credentials.
Similarly a libertarian can be morally opposed to murder, but once they advocate using police power to arrest a murderer they give up their libertarian credentials.
The reason left wingers end up with so many unsupportable positions is because they can't accurately analyze anything.
You don’t know the first thing about being a libertarian, shrike.
A "pro- choice" libertarian must believe that human rights are not an intrinsic quality of human beings and are therefore granted by the state. In other words, at a fundamental level, they do not really believe in human rights.
Let's just consider this thread a place of silent reflection...
SHUT UP THEN!
That escalated quickly
And so we conclude that the right of a baby to not be killed outweighs a woman's right to not be pregnant or not to provide the sustenance a growing baby needs to live in her womb.
That opinion is acceptable as long as the state doesn't categorize it as "murder" and mete out punishment to the mother and/or doctor.
You assume the conclusion.
Yup.
he's going to talk to comedians about if social justice is a religion.
Sounds like some hare-brained late night Fox News topic.
Those idiots are prone to stupid comments like WELL ATHEISM IS A RELIGION TOO!
Turn yourself in for your crimes against children, pedo.
Wokianity is Christianity with God and redemption removed and then repackaged in postmodernist language.
"ATHEISM IS A RELIGION"
Atheism is a set of unproven and currently unprovable but deeply held beliefs. Agnosticism is the free thinking rational stance.
WELL ATHEISM IS A RELIGION TOO
It is.
Atheism Plus!
Dogmatic atheistic fucks like you are religious in your zealotry and hatred of any other religion.
whether Hitler was a socialist or a capitalist.
He was a fascist. The glorification of the nation/race meant everything.
Words have meaning.
Next let's debate if quartz is a vegetable or a fruit.
He was also a socialist. He was the leader of a socialist party. He wrote a party platform dedicated to institutionalizing socialism. He praised socialism in every speech he gave. When he gained power he socialized huge swaths of German industry, he socialized medicine, he socialized energy production, he socialized transportation.
Words have meaning.
You're full of shit:
Richard Evans, in his magisterial three-volume history of Nazi Germany, is quite clear on whether Hitler was a socialist: “…it would be wrong to see Nazism as a form of, or an outgrowth of, socialism.” (The Coming of the Third Reich, Evans, p. 173). Not only was Hitler not a socialist himself, nor a communist, but he actually hated these ideologies and did his utmost to eradicate them. At first this involved organizing bands of thugs to attack socialists in the street, but grew into invading Russia, in part to enslave the population and earn ‘living‘ room for Germans, and in part to wipe out communism and ‘Bolshevism’.
The key element here is what Hitler did, believed and tried to create. Nazism, confused as it was, was fundamentally an ideology built around race, while socialism was entirely different: built around class. Hitler aimed to unite the right and left, including workers and their bosses, into a new German nation based on the racial identity of those in it. Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state, whatever race the worker was from. Nazism drew on a range of pan-German theories, which wanted to blend Aryan workers and Aryan magnates into a super Aryan state, which would involve the eradication of class focused socialism, as well as Judaism and other ideas deemed non-German.
https://www.thoughtco.com/was-adolf-hitler-a-socialist-1221367
Gosh, I can't imagine why a left-wing Oxford scholar and writer for The Nation and Vox would try not to associate the Nazis with socialism. Richard Evans is practicing your favorite rhetorical technique, twisting the truth.
The Nazi's were crystal clear about their socialism:
Why Are We Socialists?
by Joseph Goebbels
We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state.
Socialism is the doctrine of liberation for the working class. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and regaining German freedom. Socialism, therefore, is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the German people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy. Socialism gains its true form only through a total fighting brotherhood with the forward-striving energies of a newly awakened nationalism. Without nationalism it is nothing, a phantom, a mere theory, a castle in the sky, a book. With it is everything, the future, freedom, the fatherland!
The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism’s nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions. The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence. An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.
The bourgeois is about to leave the historical stage. In its place will come the class of productive workers, the working class, that has been up until today oppressed. It is beginning to fulfill its political mission. It is involved in a hard and bitter struggle for political power as it seeks to become part of the national organism. The battle began in the economic realm; it will finish in the political. It is not merely a matter of wages, not only a matter of the number of hours worked in a day — though we may never forget that these are an essential, perhaps even the most significant part of the socialist platform — but it is much more a matter of incorporating a powerful and responsible class in the state, perhaps even to make it the dominant force in the future politics of the fatherland. The bourgeoisie does not want to recognize the strength of the working class...
We are socialists because we see the social question as a matter of necessity and justice for the very existence of a state for our people, not a question of cheap pity or insulting sentimentality. The worker has a claim to a living standard that corresponds to what he produces. We have no intention of begging for that right. Incorporating him in the state organism is not only a critical matter for him, but for the whole nation. The question is larger than the eight-hour day. It is a matter of forming a new state consciousness that includes every productive citizen. Since the political powers of the day are neither willing nor able to create such a situation, socialism must be fought for. It is a fighting slogan both inwardly and outwardly. It is aimed domestically at the bourgeois parties and Marxism at the same time, because both are sworn enemies of the coming workers’ state. It is directed abroad at all powers that threaten our national existence and thereby the possibility of the coming socialist national state.
Socialism is possible only in a state that is united domestically and free internationally. The bourgeoisie and Marxism are responsible for failing to reach both goals, domestic unity and international freedom. No matter how national and social these two forces present themselves, they are the sworn enemies of a socialist national state.
We must therefore break both groups politically. The lines of German socialism are sharp, and our path is clear.
We are against the political bourgeoisie, and for genuine nationalism!
We are against Marxism, but for true socialism!
We are for the first German national state of a socialist nature!
We are for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party!
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/haken32.htm
Hahahahaha, goddamn I love when he gets destroyed like this.
Goebbels the propagandist would be your beloved authority, you Nazi fuckface.
Goebbels was referring to NATIONAL SOCIALISM aka NAZIISM. Right wing Race/Nation elevation based on race, idiot.
You are truly a fucking Nazi.
Now let's look at the official Nazi Party Platform, which was a 25-point program for the creation of a Nazi state and society.
Do you think that we'll find some socialism, Shrike?
1. We demand the union of all Germans in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of national self-determination.
2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in its dealings with other nations, and the revocation of the peace treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) to feed our people and to settle our surplus population.
4. Only members of the nation may be citizens of the State. Only those of German blood, whatever their creed, may be members of the nation. Accordingly, no Jew may be a member of the nation.
5. Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.
6. The right to vote on the State’s government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.
We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.
7. We demand that the State shall make it its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens. If it should prove impossible to feed the entire population, foreign nationals (non-citizens) must be deported from the Reich.
8. All non-German immigration must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany after 2 August 1914 shall be required to leave the Reich forthwith.
9. All citizens shall have equal rights and duties.
10. It must be the first duty of every citizen to perform physical or mental work. The activities of the individual must not clash with the general interest, but must proceed within the framework of the community and be for the general good.
We demand therefore:
11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work.
The breaking of the slavery of interest
12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).
14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.
15. We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.
16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municipal orders.
17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.
19. We demand that Roman Law, which serves a materialistic world order, be replaced by a German common law.
20. The State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education (with the aim of opening up to every able and hard-working German the possibility of higher education and of thus obtaining advancement). The curricula of all educational establishments must be brought into line with the requirements of practical life. The aim of the school must be to give the pupil, beginning with the first sign of intelligence, a grasp of the notion of the State (through the study of civic affairs). We demand the education of gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.
21. The State must ensure that the nation’s health standards are raised by protecting mothers and infants, by prohibiting child labor, by promoting physical strength through legislation providing for compulsory gymnastics and sports, and by the extensive support of clubs engaged in the physical training of youth.
22. We demand the abolition of the mercenary [i.e. professional] army and the formation of a people’s army.
23. We demand legal warfare on deliberate political mendacity and its dissemination in the press. To facilitate the creation of a German national press we demand:
(a) that all editors of, and contributors to newspapers appearing in the German language must be members of the nation;
(b) that no non-German newspapers may appear without the express permission of the State. They must not be printed in the German language;
(c) that non-Germans shall be prohibited by law from participating financially in or influencing German newspapers, and that the penalty for contravening such a law shall be the suppression of any such newspaper, and the immediate deportation of the non-Germans involved.
The publishing of papers which are not conducive to the national welfare must be forbidden. We demand the legal prosecution of all those tendencies in art and literature which corrupt our national life, and the suppression of cultural events which violate this demand.
24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations in the State, provided they do not threaten its existence nor offend the moral feelings of the German race.
The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not commit itself to any particular denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialist spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.
25. To put the whole of this program into effect, we demand the creation of a strong central state power for the Reich; the unconditional authority of the political central Parliament over the entire Reich and its organizations; and the formation of Corporations based on estate and occupation for the purpose of carrying out the general legislation passed by the Reich in the various German states.
The leaders of the Party promise to work ruthlessly—if need be to sacrifice their very lives—to translate this program into action.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-party-platform
Gosh, "the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations, etc..." Sure sounds like socialism.
Socialism, in contrast, was a class struggle, aiming to build a workers state,
Socialism isn't a class struggle, Marxism is. Socialism is a economic organization principle. It's a category error to believe, or pretend to believe, that organizing to advance racism precludes that organization from being socialist. In fact it's so obviously wrong if this is the best rebuttal the assertion should be considered proven.
Hitler’s National Socialism, and quickly the only National Socialism which mattered, wished to promote those of ‘pure’ German blood, removing citizenship for Jews and aliens, and promoted eugenics, including the execution of the disabled and mentally ill. National Socialism did promote equality among Germans who passed their racist criteria, and submitted the individual to the will of the state, but did so as a right-wing racial movement which sought a nation of healthy Aryans living in a thousand year Reich, which would be achieved through war. In Nazi theory, a new, unified class was to be formed instead of religious, political and class divides, but this was to be done by rejecting ideologies such as liberalism, capitalism, and socialism, and instead pursue a different idea, of the Volksgemeinschaft (people’s community), built on war and race, ‘blood and soil’, and German heritage. Race was to be the heart of Nazism, as opposed to class-focused socialism.
MAKE GERMANY GREAT AGAIN! (Hitler 1933)
Build Germany Back Better!
What difference, at this point, does it make?
"Race was to be the heart of Nazism, as opposed to class-focused socialism."
As demonstrated in the links above, the Nazi's disagree.
Don’t you ever get tired of being embarrassed shrike?
Shrike had that part of his brain removed years ago.
Did they take to much when they gave him the pedo suppression treatment?
So... help me out here. This word "NIMBY" that's recently become a favorite of the left to throw around... why is it that the people who decry "nimbyism" (which is seemingly increasingly misused) are the ones who ushered it in. I get a very Paul Krugman feel... they create the problem, then suddenly act as if they're the ones who are uniquely qualified to get us out of it. To wit:
How the NIMBY mindset is affecting the future of EVs
The endless, over-cautious environmental review process, the ability for local residents most affected by the potential environmental second-order effects being able to have input into the process... all of it... ALL OF IT was championed by the very people bitching about "NIMBYISM".
You baked this cake, now eat it.
"the Indigenous Sami population in the north"
The funniest bit is that the "Indigenous Sami" are genetically far less indigenous to Scandinavia than your average non-Sami Swede and Norwegian.
The whole "indigenous peoples" racket is so phony.
You know of course that when you bad mouth the reindeer people you make St. Nicholas, and by extension, baby Jesus cry. I can't believe we're even having this conversation.
Yep, came from the upper Volga well after Scandinavians.
Because that’s what progressives have always done?
George Lincoln Rockwell (March 9, 1918 – August 25, 1967) was an American far-right political activist and founder of the American Nazi Party. He later became a major figure in the neo-Nazi movement in the United States, and his beliefs, strategies, and writings have continued to influence many white supremacists and neo-Nazis.
Born in Bloomington, Illinois, Rockwell briefly studied philosophy at Brown University before dropping out to join the Navy. He trained as a pilot and served in World War II and the Korean War in non-combat roles, achieving the rank of Commander. Rockwell's politics grew more radical and vocal in the 1950s, and he was honorably discharged due to his views in 1960.
In politics, he regularly praised Adolf Hitler, referring to him as the "White savior of the twentieth century".[1] He denied the Holocaust and believed that Martin Luther King Jr. was a tool for Jewish Communists wanting to rule the white community. He blamed the civil rights movement on Jews, and viewed most of them as traitors.[1] He viewed black people as a primitive, lethargic race who desired only simple pleasures and a life of irresponsibility and supported the resettlement of all African Americans in a new African state to be funded by the U.S. government.[1] As a supporter of racial segregation and white separatism, he agreed with and quoted many leaders of the Black separatism movement such as Elijah Muhammad and early Malcolm X.[2][3] In his later years, Rockwell became increasingly aligned with other Neo-Nazi groups, leading the World Union of National Socialists.
Would be a fine MAGA guy today.
source Wikipedia
Sounds like the kind of guy that would fit right in teaching Critical Race Theory at one of our fine public institutions.
A few years back SPB posted kiddy porn to this site, and his initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead SPB keeps showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get him to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
Most other topics are approached with an evenhandedness that attempts to at least acknowledge that those who disagree with the panelists are doing so in good faith and are at least attempting to be reasonable.
This is not true. While disagreement from the left is treated with respect essentially all disagreement from the right is not. For example on immigration opponents of illegal immigration are slandered as both racist and opponents of immigration generally, ignoring the distinction between legal and illegal. Opponents of race preferences and left sourced LEO reform are similarly slandered as racist.
Until people start respecting REALITY over IMAGINATIONS the USA will be at risk of all sorts of IMAGINARY dictation justifications...
Face the Facts....
If you cannot support ?baby? freedom (i.e. Fetal Ejection)
UR supporting Gov-Gun FORCED reproduction...
It baffles me how *reality* can be utterly ignored by partisan imaginary creatures.
And the catalyst to all this arguing is believing the USA is a [WE] mobs RULES! government.
Everyone's wants to be part of the [WE] mob that RULES!.... The same reason people join Gangs of Intimidation (Power-Mad trip)... Live your life and enjoy what freedom you have left instead of compulsively joining [WE] Gangs of selfish-importance needs to END Individual Liberty (freedom) of others... i.e. MIND UR OWN BUSINESS!
If you are so sold that 'babies' are being murder; pass a law that doctors cannot **intentionally** dismantle a fetus... END OF DEBATE... Otherwise you're taking others freedom away because you have imagination 'faith' with ZERO basis in reality.
Women are NOT 'medical equipment' of the State even if it saves your 'faith' in 'potential' life. They are human and just as SLAVERY has been a curse on history so will this type of SLAVERY be. Even if one believes it saves 'potential' life.
That is YOUR 'belief'
It's not everyone's 'belief'... It is NOT fact. In fact it defies *reality* (demonstrate a 'baby' by fetal ejection) or stop pretending there's a 'baby' to save.
You have a right to your 'beliefs'....
You don't have a right to use Gov-Guns and FORCE your beliefs onto others.
More perspective; Pro-Life is NO DIFFERENT than a [WE] mob insisting Organ Donation be mandatory.
Could you start ending some of your posts with:
(Chortle)?
That would be great, thanks.
So all the major Western European leaders are discussing the 'end of abundance' and telling their citizens to tighten their belts and suck it up.
I feel like I've got a front row, center court seat watching the no-shit decline of Western Civilization. Tomorrow I hope to see 5 posts about weed, two on food trucks, and hopefully at least one on Josh Hawley. Maybe throw in something on demonetized sex workers in the AM linx.
Did you see the calls from an EU wonk that there'll be trouble "unless the EU swiftly moves to impose a price cap on runaway gas prices" ?
So, cause the problem. Exacerbate the problem. Then call for a socialist solution to the problem, the same socialist solution that worked so well to "fix" Venezuela in the 20teens. Seems like something to explore. Hell, for a libertarian, it seems like fish in a fucking barrel.
Let's see if the Libertarian magazine has words to share on this tomorrow.
Link to the libertarian magazine?
You asked, I give.
I’ve read some of the links you’ve posted to them before. I need to just put them in my regular rotation already.
And:
Some random headlines... if you're looking for a respite on breathless Josh Hawley explainers:
The fatwa and the birth of Muslim identity politics
The poll-tax riots and the exhaustion of the left
‘Radical chic’ and the left’s problem with race
Sorry man, I left off the air quotes when referring to Reason as Libertarian.
Should have been "Libertarian" magazine.
Spoiler Alert: they won’t.
No, there is no defense of human life involved in banning abortion. The loss is merely doubled out of spite. If you think a law is a magic wand, and not a loaded gun, then you are an authoritarian collectivist.
Well said... +10000000000... There is NO Justice in demanding Women keep reproducing or get shot by police trying to escape an arrest. "doubled out of spite" really is the authoritarian collectivist flagship.
Did you hear the EU expert warn that "unless the EU immediately measures to establish a price ceiling on runaway gas prices," disaster will brew?
Therefore, start the issue. Make the issue worse. Then demand a socialist solution to the issue, the same socialist approach that successfully "fixed" Venezuela in the 1920s. It seems like a topic worth investigating. Hell, it seems like a lock-step situation for a libertarian. Check if the Libertarian magazine has anything to say about this tomorrow.Author:Dental Billing Services
The EU and Hungary have a similar history. In fact, Poland and Hungary are not receiving the promised cash from the EU that was meant for the post-pandemic economic recovery. Brussels accuses both of disobeying the “rule of law.” Hungary and Poland have distinct perspectives on their conflicts with the EU. Many Poles view the EU as merely a German extension. They see former German chancellor Angela Merkel’s ally and current president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen as the executor of Germany’s will. On the other hand, the Brussels bureaucracy is frequently seen as the issue by Hungarians. The EU under von der Leyen, in the opinion of the Hungarians, is imposing its particular brand of woke ideology on member states, more or less independently of Berlin.ReadMore:: Medical Coding Services
Aiming to at least acknowledge that people who disagree with the panellists are doing so in good faith and are making an effort to be rational, most other topics are treated with an even hand.
That is untrue. Almost all disagreement on the right is not respected, but disagreement from the left is. For instance, when it comes to immigration, those who oppose illegal immigration are disparaged as racists and opponents of immigration in general, disregarding the difference between legal and illegal immigration. Similar accusations of racism are levelled against opponents of left-wing LEO reform and race preferences.
Author: Dental Billing Company
Thank you for the article!
This topic is quite relevant and interesting. In general, we have to help students, as it is quite difficult to study and work. Student loans in adult life do not allow to achieve life goals. If you are interested in this topic, I recommend you to read here: https://writingbros.com/essay-examples/life-goals/ with examples of papers. Thanks for the interesting podcast and article!