Almost all of the judges eligible for senior status now were also eligible in 2020, long before Emil Bove.
In December 2023, only three Justices would have granted in Tingley v. Ferguson, which presented the same issue.
The article misattributed two quotations to Judge Ho. And variants of those quotes appeared in the majority, but there were inexplicable alterations.
There is absolutely no evidence showing that the ABA's dictates are effective.
WSJ got some inside information about the pending Trump civil-fraud case.
Justice Kavanaugh thought NetChoice would win on the merits, but "the balance of harms and equities" did not favor allowing the injunction to go into effect.
Judge Katsas says no, Judge Rao leaves open the possibility.
Last year, the calendars were posted by the end of July.
I am still incredulous that Justice Barrett does not read coverage about herself.
And DOJ files a misconduct complaint against Judge Boasberg.
The New York Times offers some insights into the Parliamentarian in Chief.
"For good reason, the Constitution vests the 'judicial Power' in 'one supreme Court,' to which all others are 'inferior Courts.'"
Is it an abuse of judicial power for a judge to issue an opinion with AI hallucinations?
Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson could have joined Justice Kavanaugh to grant cert in the CPSC case, but they didn't.
What is a "religion"? When is a religious belief "sincere"? When is a burden on religion "substantial"?
The Supreme Court may not have to intervene for "run-of-the mill cases" but will intervene for "major new federal statutes or executive actions."
If the Supreme Court wants to rebuke lower courts for not acting promptly enough, the Justices should police their own conduct.
Mi CASA no es su CASA
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks